Home
Login Register
Biosensors   

Is Biosensors a good buy?

 Post Reply 9001-9020 of 10899
 
jackjames
    09-Jan-2008 10:13  
Contact    Quote!


hey, bengster, don't scare me okay.. you think about me last night??? wakau..

where am I lately? I am still here at SJ sometimes , I quit and join you guys all the time.... oh yeah, I just finished my one whole day wedding photo shoot this Monday... will share the happiness with you all once it is done ! heee..

Bengster, if I am lucky enough, I will pocket in the nett profit of SGD 250K by 1Q 2009, how I did it, I will write a full details summary of how i do it..  not stocks, but something else, kekekeke...

back to biosensor, it's going to be one dollars, KEKEKEKE
 
 
Pension
    09-Jan-2008 10:03  
Contact    Quote!
as this counter is concern, since it listed, share holder enjoy zero dividend.
 
 
cwwan1
    09-Jan-2008 09:58  
Contact    Quote!
If  this is a US partnership, BIO will super cheong!!! Otherwise why halt, must be big news!
 

 
bengster68
    09-Jan-2008 09:56  
Contact    Quote!


Hello to almostthere. Uncle jackjames you MIA to where? I though you have quited on this stock liao. Frankly i was just thinking abt you last nite and suddenly this morning i saw your posting again. Just like Mr Investor also. A bit of voodo feel man.........

Trading Halt means the news must be something substantial enough to affect the share price. Don't tell me its the "mother of all chiong" i mentioned earlier........ the BIG deal??? Should not be so early according to my calculations though. But BIG has the best proven DES technology so deals may be fast and furious. Just have to wait a while and see. I think it should be something positive. Mai Kan Chiong. Just sit back and we may see some opening gap up after lifting of trading halt  Smiley
 
 
myopia
    09-Jan-2008 09:55  
Contact    Quote!


mr jackjames shouldn't treat a lonely man like tat. wait he jump, how?  let's be tolerant & pity him.
 
 
Pension
    09-Jan-2008 09:49  
Contact    Quote!
i noticed someone here panic, juz face the fact.
 

 
Madnezz
    09-Jan-2008 09:49  
Contact    Quote!
cBrother Bengster, maybe they are going to announce what you have already told us, regard a medical device company accumulating a strategic stake in BIG.
 
 
jackjames
    09-Jan-2008 09:46  
Contact    Quote!


yeah, bengster, I agreed with you! Somebody created a thread himself and self entertaining until he gets bored himself everyday, that's why come to this thread and pollute...

GET LOST !
 
 
Pension
    09-Jan-2008 09:24  
Contact    Quote!
dun comfort ur self, face the fact. it will drop when trading halt lifted today.
 
 
A02041315
    09-Jan-2008 09:21  
Contact    Quote!


Huahar Ge!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Happy New Year!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

CHEERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

 
allright
    09-Jan-2008 09:19  
Contact    Quote!
Trading halt to announce business patnership and cooperation. Great. More and more good news. I agree with almostthere. Don't bother with negative energy.
 
 
almostthere
    09-Jan-2008 08:56  
Contact    Quote!
Happy New Year Bengster68.  Cheers to a good year ahead.  My suggestion is to ignore.  It is negative energy and does not deserve your bother and time.  The rest of us are engaged with you positively.
 
 
Pension
    09-Jan-2008 08:55  
Contact    Quote!
lucky, save by the halt to avoid massive morning sell down today. T+5 today.
 
 
A02041315
    09-Jan-2008 08:47  
Contact    Quote!
 
 
bengster68
    08-Jan-2008 23:23  
Contact    Quote!
Pension
Elite
Posted: 08-Jan-2008 22:23
x 0
x 0


t+5 tommorrow, force selling.
Pension, we welcome you if you have some good contributions to share but stop polluting this thread with meaningless wild predictions. People will think you have a serious problem. Go and post what ever you want in your own thread. If your predictions are good, you will have a lot of forumers following your guru predictions. Frankly i don't even bother to go in your thread as the "increased number of views" may further boost your ego and you start behaving even worse than now.   
 

 
bengster68
    08-Jan-2008 23:16  
Contact    Quote!


Paclitaxel drug is toxic in nature and not as effect as limus family drug. Actually Sirolimus is quite a good limus drug. After so many trials comparing both DESs over the last few years, i feel Cypher is a better DES than Taxus. But Taxus is the global market leader and selling about 10% higher than Cypher. Funny isn't it??? Patients are actually paying more for an inferior DES and the inferior DES is selling better than the better one. Doctors must be playing a part in this scam to con patients.

China JWMS uses Sirolimus (a.k.a rapamycin) but on a biodegredable polymer. The problem of JNJ's cypher DES is the durable polymer. JW's EXCEL made-in-china DES has the potential to perform better than Cypher which cost much more.
 
 
Pension
    08-Jan-2008 22:23  
Contact    Quote!


t+5 tommorrow, force selling.
 
 
cwwan1
    08-Jan-2008 22:20  
Contact    Quote!


Sirolimus stents may reduce restenosis in diabetics with coronary disease Source: Reuters Author: Date: Mon, 7 January 2008 Compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) appear to decrease the risk of in-stent late luminal loss in diabetics with coronary artery disease, new research shows. The optimal drug-eluting stents for diabetic patients has been unclear, lead author Dr. Fabrizio Tomai, from the European Hospital in Rome, and colleagues note in the January issue of Diabetes Care. Comparing PES with SES has been difficult since there are so many individual variables that contribute to neointimal hyperplasia. In the present study, the researchers addressed this problem by comparing PES and SES directly in the same diabetic patient. The study enrolled 60 patients with two or more significant de novo angiographic stenoses in different coronary segments. Overall, 60 lesions were successfully treated with PES and 60 with SES, the report shows. (Another 26 coronary lesions were treated with bare metal stents and were not included in the analysis.) The main outcome measure was the occurrence of angiographic in-stent late luminal loss at eight-month follow-up. This was lower with the SES (0.26 mm) than with the PES (0.50 mm), a significant difference (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, the type of drug-eluting stent was the only independent predictor of in-stent late luminal loss. Specifically, in-stent late luminal loss was 2.3-times more likely when a PES rather than a SES was used (p = 0.03). Further research is needed to determine if the better angiographic results achieved with SES actually translate into long-term clinical benefits, the authors conclude.

 
 
 
bengster68
    08-Jan-2008 22:09  
Contact    Quote!
allright
Member
Posted: 08-Jan-2008 16:12
x 0
x 0
Thanks. That is very technical and I have been reading your postings and noticed you have been very good at this. I think as i am new I will stick to buying and keeping the little i bought though high at .885
You will see her true colours when she short BIG. Just to make some money from shorting, can even say i "hai see ren", very evil and slander me all over forums. Smiley  When people long a certain stock, kelong penny stock company also can say until flying blue chip. When shorting a stock, will create all kinds of fear to forumers and slander a helpful person. Frankly im never afraid of dead corpes or ghosts. Humans can be more horrible than you can imagine.
 
 
Pension
    08-Jan-2008 20:50  
Contact    Quote!
tommorrow is t+5, trade with care.
 
Important: Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy .