Home
Login Register
Vard   

STXOSV

 Post Reply 881-900 of 5364
 
GorgeousOng
    12-Mar-2013 06:44  
Contact    Quote!
iPunter, you have more experience, can help to explain? Pls enlighten me. Thank you!

CWC2929      ( Date: 12-Mar-2013 01:37) Posted:

funny.......who shorted Stxosv !!!!?????...........(620 lots)................Smiley

 
 
CWC2929
    12-Mar-2013 01:37  
Contact    Quote!
funny.......who shorted Stxosv !!!!?????...........(620 lots)................Smiley
 
 
GorgeousOng
    11-Mar-2013 20:51  
Contact    Quote!
I just checked with my advisor, the company can not offer below 1.22

darkknight      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 20:27) Posted:



I think under SGX rule there is a one year black out before the same company can initiate another take over  if the mandatory cash offer fail the first round, any price adjustment has to announce before the closure date in this case.

Chewbecca      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 20:01) Posted:

You mean it's not guaranteed after the expiry of offer on wed.


 

 
darkknight
    11-Mar-2013 20:27  
Contact    Quote!


I think under SGX rule there is a one year black out before the same company can initiate another take over  if the mandatory cash offer fail the first round, any price adjustment has to announce before the closure date in this case.

Chewbecca      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 20:01) Posted:

You mean it's not guaranteed after the expiry of offer on wed.

iPunter      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 18:52) Posted:



1.22 is not a guaranteed price by the new company...

For what you know the new company may not even offer that price again,

since they have already offered a good price (1.22),  which the original owners

were happy to sell to them. It may be in their interest to offer even a lower price...


 
 
Chewbecca
    11-Mar-2013 20:01  
Contact    Quote!
You mean it's not guaranteed after the expiry of offer on wed.

iPunter      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 18:52) Posted:



1.22 is not a guaranteed price by the new company...

For what you know the new company may not even offer that price again,

since they have already offered a good price (1.22),  which the original owners

were happy to sell to them. It may be in their interest to offer even a lower price...


yokoosi      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 15:14) Posted:

If you have already factored in the worst case of 1.22, than no worries. Calculated Risk is different from Gambling.


 
 
iPunter
    11-Mar-2013 18:52  
Contact    Quote!


1.22 is not a guaranteed price by the new company...

For what you know the new company may not even offer that price again,

since they have already offered a good price (1.22),  which the original owners

were happy to sell to them. It may be in their interest to offer even a lower price...


yokoosi      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 15:14) Posted:

If you have already factored in the worst case of 1.22, than no worries. Calculated Risk is different from Gambling.

 

 
BummerHuat
    11-Mar-2013 18:21  
Contact    Quote!


Agreed. When it comes to gambling, the odds are against you.

When it comes to investing, we can improve the odds by accumulating knowledge so that we are able to form a view of our own and got the guts to stick to it when there is noise in the market. From my experience, fundamentals will eventually prevail in the long term. However, in the short term, it is really like betting cos you never know when the big players suddenly decide to buy or sell.


My bet is that the GO will not go through and the Italians will not even come close to reaching 90%. I may be wrong, but considering all the factors, it has a very favorable risk-adjusted return.


yokoosi      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 15:14) Posted:

If you have already factored in the worst case of 1.22, than no worries. Calculated Risk is different from Gambling.

 
 
luvkarena
    11-Mar-2013 15:58  
Contact    Quote!
DateOpen PriceTarget PriceUpside/DownsidePrice CallSourceNews
28/02/20131.3051.82+0.515 (39.46%)BUYMacQuariePrice Target News
27/02/20131.271.82+0.55 (43.31%)BUYOSKPrice Target News
27/02/20131.271.52+0.25 (19.69%)BUYOCBCPrice Target News
27/02/20131.271.38+0.11 (8.66%)HOLDCIMBPrice Target News
15/02/20131.2651.52+0.255 (20.16%)BUYOCBCPrice Target News
24/12/20121.3051.47+0.165 (12.64%)HOLDCIMBPrice Target News
21/12/20121.302.05+0.75 (57.69%)BUYOSK-DMGPrice Target News
21/12/20121.302.05+0.75 (57.69%)BUYOSKPrice Target News
21/12/20121.301.69+0.39 (30.00%)BUYOCBCPrice Target News
21/12/20121.301.47+0.17 (13.08%)BUYCIMBPrice Target News
12/12/20121.452.00+0.55 (37.93%)BUYDBS VickersPrice Target News
29/11/20121.3552.16+0.805 (59.41%)BUYKim EngPrice Target News
23/11/20121.381.70+0.32 (23.19%)BUYCitigroupPrice Target News
15/11/20121.4251.69+0.265 (18.60%)BUYOCBCPrice Target News
15/11/20121.4252.00+0.575 (40.35%)BUYDBS VickersPrice Target News
15/11/20121.4251.47+0.045 (3.16%)HOLDCIMBPrice Target News
17/10/20121.5952.10+0.505 (31.66%)BUYDBS VickersPrice Target News
11/10/20121.582.02+0.44 (27.85%)BUYOSKPrice Target News
11/10/20121.582.00+0.42 (26.58%)BUYOCBCPrice Target News
05/10/20121.6152.00+0.385 (23.84%)BUYOCBCPrice Target News
03/10/20121.6052.20+0.595 (37.07%)BUYOSKPrice Target News
03/10/20121.6052.00+0.395 (24.61%)BUYOCBCPrice Target News
03/10/20121.6052.00+0.395 (24.61%)BUYDBS VickersPrice Target News
 
 
yokoosi
    11-Mar-2013 15:14  
Contact    Quote!
If you have already factored in the worst case of 1.22, than no worries. Calculated Risk is different from Gambling.
 
 
GorgeousOng
    11-Mar-2013 14:55  
Contact    Quote!
I know Stomer has good intention.:))

darkknight      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 09:05) Posted:

looking at his previous posts, i think he is advising to trade within our means, don't blindly follow other's rallying buy call.

GorgeousOng      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 08:41) Posted:

I find that the "Stomer" very kacau...throw one statement here n disappear.... I am waiting for him to post...may be he is mauing now? Who knows???? Hahaaaa


 

 
Octavia
    11-Mar-2013 14:53  
Contact    Quote!
Sayonara liao...Smiley 356
 
 
luvkarena
    11-Mar-2013 14:35  
Contact    Quote!
Breakdown!!!! wtf....
 
 
Chewbecca
    11-Mar-2013 14:11  
Contact    Quote!
Best case they sell all at 1.22. Don't want them selling in market after 1.22 offer expires

luvkarena      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 13:04) Posted:

From today's dealing disclosure by OZ fund, they only sold 60 lots of shares on last Friday. This is an encouraging sign that they slowed down their selling. Is it because the price is too low to sell?

 
 
luvkarena
    11-Mar-2013 13:04  
Contact    Quote!
From today's dealing disclosure by OZ fund, they only sold 60 lots of shares on last Friday. This is an encouraging sign that they slowed down their selling. Is it because the price is too low to sell?
 
 
angmohlin
    11-Mar-2013 13:03  
Contact    Quote!


Monthly chart shown bottoming & weekly chart shown descending triangle with the strong support at 1.24. Once breakout from the descending triangle then upside prevails.

Keep fringers crossed. 
 

 
Chewbecca
    11-Mar-2013 10:22  
Contact    Quote!
Hopefully oz sells all its remaining stake at 1.22 which I think they will
 
 
yokoosi
    11-Mar-2013 09:49  
Contact    Quote!
We'll know in 2 days time. Huat Ah !
 
 
luvkarena
    11-Mar-2013 09:35  
Contact    Quote!


I think the price will go up further after wed announcement. It might be at least $1.335 then. and hopefully it go up further from then. lolx...

I have accumulated since Friday. Hopefully can make few thousands out of this trade... 
 
 
rutheone1905
    11-Mar-2013 09:26  
Contact    Quote!


not vested

stxosv parent abandoned child, weak parent cos the price of this one sell like garbage.

now adopted parent takes over, debt problem no more, price din chiong becos ppl worried if buy-out succeed then it will be 1.22

however if fails then this child will present it true value to the market....then it will probably revalue by institutes 
 
 
darkknight
    11-Mar-2013 09:05  
Contact    Quote!
looking at his previous posts, i think he is advising to trade within our means, don't blindly follow other's rallying buy call.

GorgeousOng      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 08:41) Posted:

I find that the "Stomer" very kacau...throw one statement here n disappear.... I am waiting for him to post...may be he is mauing now? Who knows???? Hahaaaa!

iPunter      ( Date: 11-Mar-2013 08:21) Posted:



No need to be " kan jiong" ... Stocks is all betting...

  If you have bought, it will either go up or go down...

      No amount of views or comments will change the direction.

          At the casino would anyone be asking for others' views?


 
Important: Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy .