
Target 0.50cts.
Sound like can get ready to get out after it hit 30ct + +....
If thing doesn't turn out to be what they've promised, I'll just sell off and move on. (Sell at the end of the year)
Anyway, I'm not alone in this.
International Hedge fund Stark investment invested US$50 millions ,purchased last year @0.27cts into Unifiber is NOT to lose money, right.
If they've done their homework, so have I.

Let see how thing turn out!
888max: just few more months to see if u r on the right track...so how do u see it in the short term run?
Yes!! $50k invested in Unifiber to test whether my due diligence is right or wrong.

sounds pretty good for a gain...888Max u must had invested quite alot...u pump in $50k right??
EPS 2006 US$0.12 increased from 2005's US$0.02.
Profit After Tax US$2,495,000 in 2006...increased from 2005's US$459,000.
Basically its NAV...Revenue are all increasing...for more info...log on to SGX website and view under their financial report...
Henry...you going for the long term in UniFiber? guess ya had bought some shares inside eh`
Current PE >100 cuz with only earnings mainly come from sg construction business side.
Come this aug 2007, you will see PE greatly reduce due to contribution from their newly wood chips operation.
Next year DMG expect UFS net profit to rise further to 27.9 mln usd.
When that day come, what do you think will happen to the PE ratio ?

Fundamental:
1) Construction business is picking up in sg. ($$$)
2) Wood chips mill is built and already started printing money for them.( Expect to reflect in this coming half year earnings report)
3) 43 yrs of rich nature forest concessions valued some US$226.2 million. Each passing year, the the value of the forest assets increase as those trees grow thicker & taller.
4) A US 863 millions new pulps mills is coming up in 2009, 80% sponsors by CMEC. Once State Council of China confirms the deal in 2nd quarter of 2007, this stock will FLY like a rocket.
" The approvals from the State Council of the Republic of China and relevant authorities are expected in 2nd quarter 2007. Pre-construction activities have commenced in early 2007"
Here the full report.
http://ir.zaobao.com/ufs/news/ufs091106.pdf
Dear All,
Do you have its foundamental data, such as EPS, PE, revanue, etc?
Thanks!
There is one possiblity as to why unifiber has still remained stagnent- must be waiting for the contra players to move away to another stock. Then when all clear it might shoot up.Just my guess. Sorry if i am wrong.
Vested 50k averg @0.285cts.
Hope to double my money this year end.

888max you really seem to be having high hopes on unifiber. all the best friend.
exactly -lot had been spoken regarding this stock yesterday, but nothing really happening.
this stock stil in hospital ...under treatment...dnt know wen wil discharge
The only way it go is ......

a buy up total of 818,000 shares this morning opening! it will rise...UP!
Update: Oils derived from wood chips could reduce cost of biofuel Trendwatch By Wolfgang Gruener Friday, May 18, 2007
Athens (GA) - The search for renewable energy sources is gaining traction and researchers from the University of Georgia now say they have found a way to use wood chips for the generation of biofuel that can be blended with biodiesel and petroleum diesel to power conventional engines. The idea to extract oils from wood isn?t an entirely new idea. What makes the approach of the University of Georgia research team interesting, however, is that they have developed a simple method of extracting oils that by itself may not be suited to power engines, but it may help to reduce the price of producing fuels from biomass. The scientists claim that the yet to be named fuel can complement biodiesel and even petroleum-based diesel to run traditional engines. To create the wood-fuel, the research team uses a process known as pyrolysis, in which wood chips and pellets are heated in the absence of oxygen at a high temperature. About one third of the dry weight of the wood turns into charcoal, the rest turns into gas. Most of this gas can be condensed into a liquid bio-oil and chemically treated. Currently, about 34% of the bio-oil created in this process can be used to power engines, the scientists estimated and added that they are working on improving the process to ?derive even more oil from the wood.? University of Georgia researchers say they can generate biofuel that can complement biodiesel or petroleum diesel from wood pellets The downside, at least for now, appears to be that the approach appears to be requiring a lot of wood. The researchers estimate that about 15-17% of the dry weight of the wood can be converted into biofuel, translating into about 41 pounds of wood to generate 1 gallon of biofuel with a weight of roughly 7 pounds per gallon. Even as an add-on to regular bio-diesel or petroleum diesel, this approach would require a lot of trees to be cut down to power, for example, car engines on a mass market basis. However, the University of Georgia researchers say that the approach has its advantages, including cheap production cost and environmental benefits. According to said Tom Adams, director of the UGA Faculty of Engineering outreach service, the fuel is nearly carbon neutral, meaning that it does not significantly increase heat-trapping carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as long as new trees are planted to replace the ones used to create the fuel. Replanting and re-growing those trees in fact may be the major challenge for this technology. While ?Georgia has 24 million acres of forested land,? according to Adams, and the state could use the technology to increase employment and tax revenues and somewhat decrease the amount of fuel the U.S. needs to import from other countries, tress have a tendency to grow not that fast. According to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, relatively fast growing trees such as pine trees, need about 50 to 60 years to reach a mature height between 100 and 120 ft. and about 25 years to reach a harvestable height of 40 ft. Sycamore trees, which are typically used for oil extraction projects, are also estimated to need about 20 to 25 years to reach a height of 40 ft. Update Tom Adams from the University of Georgia followed up with us and our concerns that generating biofuel from wood may result in cutting done many trees. In fact, he shared our concern saying that growing pine trees in a farm currently provide only about 2 tons of wood per acre per year. However, he suggested that he suggested that other plants that can be harvested once a year, such as grasses, may provide more bio-mass and may end up more suited to become a source for bio-fuels. For example, he said that switchgrass grows about 6 tons of biomass per year. Also, Adams believes that currently unused bio-mass when trees are harvested could be used for his method of producing bio-fuel ? he estimates that about 15% of bio-mass is wasted when trees are cut down these days. So, how much bio-fuel could be generated in this way and how much would it cost? According to Adams, there is enough low-quality bio-mass (as opposed to high-quality biomass that is also used for food products) in the U.S. to cover about 30% of the fuel needs of Americans. It is not enough to completely make the country independent from fuel imports today, but combined with petroleum available in the U.S. and a more conscious use of energy it could minimize oil imports to the U.S., Adams believes. In terms of cost, the scientist estimates that low-quality biomass-based crude oil that has the same density as today?s bio-diesel could be produced for about 50 cents per gallon. However that excludes the process to refine the bio-fuel for a mass market use. Add this cost as well as a profit margin and you could be imagining bio-diesel that is available to Americans for less than $1.50 per gallon.

Wow..like that burn more forest botak, then make this world less to green and more floor..

Future of Biofuels May Lie in Wood |
|
UK: May 23, 2007
|
YORK, England - Wood rather than wheat may hold the key to Europe's efforts to cut emissions of greenhouse gases by expanding biofuels production, the head of a research body funded by the UK government told Reuters. |
Jeremy Tomkinson, chief executive of the York-based National Non-Food Crops Centre, said government support would be needed as wood-based technologies required large capital investment and long-term guarantees of future demand. He said wood-based biofuel production plants could become widespread by the middle of the next decade although they required an investment of around 500 million pounds (US$986 million), or 10 times the cost of a first-generation bioethanol or biodiesel refinery. "You are looking at potentially a 10 to 12 year buyback time for the (wood-based) plant. These people need to have confidence that the market is going to remain there," Tomkinson said. First generation biofuels are usually produced from food crops such as wheat, maize, sugar or vegetable oils. They require energy-intensive inputs like fertiliser, which make it difficult to cut the emissions of gases contributing to climate change. The global boom in these fuels has also pushed up the price of foodstuffs. Tomkinson said fuels based on grains and vegetable oils should not be abandoned until the second generation technology became widespread as they helped introduce biofuels to the market and provided experience on how to blend them into fuel. STEPPING STONE "That's a stepping stone that gets us on the race track..The real game is second generation," he said. The new methods help turn plant cellulose into ethanol or diesel and could ease the competition between fuel and food uses for crops, which could become fierce as European countries blend in increasing amounts of biological components into fuel. The UK requires road transport fuels to incorporate 2.5 percent biofuel by 2008 and 5 percent by 2010. Production based on UK crops such as wheat and rapeseed will be augmented by imports from major biofuels producers such as Brazil. "We should use the wheat," Tomkinson said. "Not strategically, though." A German company is planning to start the world's first commercial-scale second generation plant later this year, turning woodchips into synthetic diesel, and it is relying on government tax breaks and government mandates on biofuel use to break even. "This isn't 'Well, can it work?'. Yes it can. The question is 'Will it?', and that is dependent upon governments," Tomkinson said. |