Post Reply
81-100 of 2490
Indofood havent buy enough at $1.12 almost 2% done. Tomorrow shopping spree will continue. We have a big mountain supporting CMZ. Action speaks louder than words.Well done Indon!! Securities & funds buying in soon within these few days, guys hold for a few more days.
GorgeousOng ( Date: 02-Sep-2013 16:45) Posted:
|
Who can kindly post the big sellers and big buyers today? If the big buyers are Indofood or its allians, then the shortists are still waiting to cover
This game is over.....
Let's look for another ....
Cheers!!!
God bless!!
being a bystander, my heart beating very faster, Now quoue to buy small at 1.12, beliving the shortists will start panic buyback sooner or later.
BTW, this may become an example of textbook to teach how market is manipulated by BBs.
Shortists are almost covered...
Is time to take profit....
My money I decide
Your money you decide
Cheers!!! Happy Ending!!!
Who know only for show ? Later major share holder rejects the offer .... Showing only !
too hard to short bluechips with large capitalization, especially those with Temasek backing..
need really deep pockets or a concerted effort by the entire world
Sporeguy ( Date: 02-Sep-2013 16:30) Posted:
|
Hope Glaucus Research find this Indofood noodles (mushroom flavor) too distressing to makan & learn to stay away from stocks listed here.
An accolade for Indofood!!!
" Things Gained Through Unjust Fraud Are Never Secure? - Sophocles
" Things Gained Through Unjust Comments Are Never Secure Too? - Mr Market
Peter_Pan ( Date: 02-Sep-2013 11:11) Posted:
|
It is high time that SGX and Spore gov take a hard look at shorting. If Spore is at the mercy of western vultures, then it is high time rethink about shorting. Either remove shorting or come up with stringent rules to prevent the western vultures bankcrupting spore.. Otherwise slowly the cancer will grow to include spore banks (read ST).
They can short but doesn't mean they will win.
srichipan ( Date: 02-Sep-2013 15:49) Posted:
|
Poor Thing! He hadn't waked up . Having a nightmare !?
Now he is laughing all the way to the bank...........
WanSiTong ( Date: 02-Sep-2013 15:27) Posted:
|
CONCLUSION
After needing a full week to prepare answers to the most basic questions about its business, we believe that
Minzhong?s response is not only inadequate, but that it also raises a host of additional red flags which further
corroborate our underlying thesis.
In an effort to distract the market, the Company has falsely accused us of acting mischievously and recklessly
without due regard for the accuracy of our statements. The Company has also falsely accused us of seeking to cause
panic and impose maximum damage on the price of the Company?s stock. We reject all of these libelous
accusations.
As the Company acknowledges, we are entitled to voice our opinions regarding the published results and
performance of the Company. Our opinions of what we believe to be the true value of the Company?s shares are
based upon our analysis and due diligence. Our opinions regarding the Company are a matter of public interest, and
publication of our opinions is justified due to the fact that investors and the capital markets are connected in a
common interest in determining the true value of the Company and its stock price. The Company disagrees with
our interpretation of the publicly available information, and has its own views, which are based upon its own
information, none of which was available to us (or to anyone in the investing public).
We have disclosed the fact that we have a short interest in the securities of the Company and stand to realize gain in
the event that the price of the securities falls ? however, that does not in any way undermine the good faith belief in
our opinions, nor does it support the Company?s accusation that we are trying to harm the Company or its
shareholders.
We did not and cannot cause investors to buy or sell shares of Minzhong. We can only express our investment
thesis and discuss the evidence upon which we base our opinions and conclusions. We have not used any false or
misleading language, or wrongful characterization of information that was available to us, and we believe our
comments were entirely fair. Investors must decide for themselves if what they believe to be the true value of
Minzhong?s shares.
However, it bears repeating that in reviewing the Company?s response, this rebuttal and our original report, market
participants would be well served to remember that while we rely on publicly available documents which are
verifiable and are generated by or submitted to independent third parties such as government offices, Minzhong is
simply relying either on non-public records or documents generated by the Company ? none of which can be
independently verified by any investor.
Ultimately, based on the preponderance of the available evidence, we continue to believe that the most plausible
interpretation of the facts and documentation available in the public domain is that the Company is a fraction
of its reported size and profitability and that it has made materially false and misleading statements to the
public in connection with its IPO and subsequent public market activities. (Source: Glaucus Research Group)
Maybe have profits should take?
...it done better than gyyy ask for...open at $1.13 ... :-)
guoyanyunyan ( Date: 27-Aug-2013 09:16) Posted:
|
Congrats to those vested before the halt..
Will anyone short a general takeover?
GorgeousOng ( Date: 02-Sep-2013 15:53) Posted:
|
Serve them right !!! Burn burn burn ! Show no mercy
caishen ( Date: 02-Sep-2013 15:53) Posted:
|
The white knight has appeared!
Likely haha. Think shortist is burning now
srichipan ( Date: 02-Sep-2013 15:45) Posted:
|
Still not scare???
Peter_Pan ( Date: 02-Sep-2013 15:48) Posted:
|