Home
Login Register
AIMSAMPIReit   

Halt? What happen

 Post Reply 81-100 of 105
 
Zelphon
    23-Nov-2009 21:29  
Contact    Quote!

U dunno the story and u buy ??!?!

U are asking for it..

 Maybe tmw will sell down to $0.29... 



win_88      ( Date: 23-Nov-2009 20:38) Posted:

haha..why will kanna short down??? izzit bad news ?? i abit blur ...haha dun know the whole story sia...Smiley

 
 
win_88
    23-Nov-2009 20:38  
Contact    Quote!
haha..why will kanna short down??? izzit bad news ?? i abit blur ...haha dun know the whole story sia...Smiley
 
 
commando
    23-Nov-2009 20:22  
Contact    Quote!
i think will kena short down tomorrow!
 

 
win_88
    23-Nov-2009 20:19  
Contact    Quote!


eh..what happen ar??????

should i sell my MI-reit or hold on? i bought at 0.365..any experts can give me idea..dun really know wat happen to this counter lately....
 
 
Zelphon
    23-Nov-2009 18:31  
Contact    Quote!


All the resolution PASSED in the EGM...

Be prepared for massive dilution and sell down tomorrow morning.... 
 
 
Zelphon
    23-Nov-2009 12:45  
Contact    Quote!


Halt again !!!

Any news from those attended the EGM ? 

 
 

 
stevento
    22-Nov-2009 12:42  
Contact    Quote!


Tomorrow EGM got a good show coming up. I wonder if Chris Clavert(ex CEO of MIREIT, CEO of CIT) will turn up.

As for the recapitalisation plan, it is good for many investors who bought at a price of between 0.20 to 0.40. It is early christmas for all.

Now as for CIT, they have their own recap problems next year. So it is interesting for them to raise the necessary funds for recap and bring down its gearing. I suspect they will do another rights issue as it is easier to raise funds through this mean.


 
 
kenkenken
    20-Nov-2009 21:24  
Contact    Quote!

They purchase 28mio at 0.40ea

http://info.sgx.com/webcoranncatth.nsf/VwAttachments/Att_D64C50476F75BB224825766B003326C0/$file/091111CITUseofProceeds.pdf?openelement



KiLrOy      ( Date: 20-Nov-2009 19:24) Posted:



http://cambridge.listedcompany.com/newsroom/20091120_160004_J91U_B9D8AE7DD3F416D748257674002BC69F.1.pdf

CITM has no financial arrangement for MI-REIT!!!!  Purely talks, they have no plan as to how they are going to do the 'rescue'.  And to know that they DO KNOW its also a conflict of interest if they are to be the manager for MI-REIT.  The rush/urgency in which they have created made a false sense of this whole saga, 'poking' at the unitholders and merely want them to vote against the MI-REIT as.  Do you feel this way?

I sense this is also a 'selfish motive or move' by CITM rather than for the major considration for the unitholders. Whether 'destructive values' to the current value due to the 28cts issued rights or, my guess is that they prob have bought their 10% avg at high price.  If 10% of their holdings and couple of trading halts can turn the tide, this will be a joke.  Perhaps MI-REITS should reconsider the value of the issue rights

If you bought it at high price mebbie 80 cts to a dollar in the early years, you would be against it too but if you got it 20 - 40 cts during mar to now this year, the issued rights is really attractive for short term gain.... : )

Not vested~

 
 
KiLrOy
    20-Nov-2009 19:24  
Contact    Quote!


http://cambridge.listedcompany.com/newsroom/20091120_160004_J91U_B9D8AE7DD3F416D748257674002BC69F.1.pdf

CITM has no financial arrangement for MI-REIT!!!!  Purely talks, they have no plan as to how they are going to do the 'rescue'.  And to know that they DO KNOW its also a conflict of interest if they are to be the manager for MI-REIT.  The rush/urgency in which they have created made a false sense of this whole saga, 'poking' at the unitholders and merely want them to vote against the MI-REIT as.  Do you feel this way?

I sense this is also a 'selfish motive or move' by CITM rather than for the major considration for the unitholders. Whether 'destructive values' to the current value due to the 28cts issued rights or, my guess is that they prob have bought their 10% avg at high price.  If 10% of their holdings and couple of trading halts can turn the tide, this will be a joke.  Perhaps MI-REITS should reconsider the value of the issue rights

If you bought it at high price mebbie 80 cts to a dollar in the early years, you would be against it too but if you got it 20 - 40 cts during mar to now this year, the issued rights is really attractive for short term gain.... : )

Not vested~
 
 
nickyng
    20-Nov-2009 14:21  
Contact    Quote!

CAMBRIDGE INDUSTRIAL TRUST MANAGEMENT LIMITED

Cambridge Industrial Trust Management Limited (“CITM”), as manager of Cambridge Industrial Trust (“CIT”), wishes to announce that the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”) has informed CITM that MAS will not approve CITM being appointed as the manager of MI-REIT in view of potential conflicts arising from the competing interests of unitholders in CIT and MI-REIT. The only proposals being considered by CITM at present are contingent upon CITM being appointed the manager of MI-REIT. CITM is continuing explore options that do not involve its being appointed as manager of MI-REIT, and further announcement will be made as and when appropriate. Notwithstanding the above, CIT still intends to vote against the resolutions to be considered at the upcoming extraordinary general meeting of MI-REIT unitholders on 23 November 2009. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD CAMBRIDGE INDUSTRIAL TRUST MANAGEMENT LIMITED (Company Registration No. 200512804G, Capital Market Services Licence No. 100132-1) (AS MANAGER OF CAMBRIDGE INDUSTRIAL TRUST) Chris Calvert Chief Executive Officer 20 November 2009

 

 
win_88
    19-Nov-2009 10:50  
Contact    Quote!
what? halt again ..haha... Smiley
 
 
Mushun2408
    17-Nov-2009 15:17  
Contact    Quote!

I am still holding a small interest and am adopting a 'wait and see' strategy.

水至清则无鱼。

混(浑)水才可以摸鱼。 ^_^



BB-trader      ( Date: 17-Nov-2009 14:22) Posted:

危墙不立, 乱邦不居, 撤

 
 
freeme
    17-Nov-2009 14:35  
Contact    Quote!
CIT seems likely to buy more to gain controlling stake. the placement might not go through.. very interesting.. not vestd
 
 
soularis
    17-Nov-2009 14:34  
Contact    Quote!
thank god, sold yesterday. the placement does seem too cheap..... can i also inject my hdb flat and pay 28c for each share.... hahahaha
 
 
BB-trader
    17-Nov-2009 14:22  
Contact    Quote!
危墙不立, 乱邦不居, 撤
 

 
Jackpot2010
    17-Nov-2009 12:02  
Contact    Quote!
Existing investors got ripped off by the unit manager (Australian) - SGX regulators still sleeping, this 1 is day-light robbery. Very dishonest management 'cos this placement to selected outsiders at <one-third NAV = 28c is paid for in kind via warehouses.  Not vested but waiting to buy on further drop. 

kenkenken      ( Date: 16-Nov-2009 22:43) Posted:

somemore so cheap for them

soloman      ( Date: 16-Nov-2009 20:28) Posted:



Why issue units to selected institutional investors ??

 

 


 
 
KiLrOy
    17-Nov-2009 10:08  
Contact    Quote!
two elephants (CIT & MIM) jumping and we are the ones that feel the tremor ...
 
 
commando
    16-Nov-2009 22:47  
Contact    Quote!
Tat's why CIT is voting against it! And sought unitholders to rally behind them. sorry not vested
 
 
kenkenken
    16-Nov-2009 22:43  
Contact    Quote!
somemore so cheap for them

soloman      ( Date: 16-Nov-2009 20:28) Posted:



Why issue units to selected institutional investors ??

 

 

 
 
acercreative
    16-Nov-2009 21:35  
Contact    Quote!
i feel a rights issue would be more equitable, at least shareholders can choose not to get diluted. 
 
Important: Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy .