Home
Login Register
ST Engineering    Last:7.82    +0.11

ST Engg

 Post Reply 741-760 of 1192
 
CWQuah
    14-Jul-2008 12:20  
Contact    Quote!


2.66 being tested.
 
 
HLJHLJ
    14-Jul-2008 00:41  
Contact    Quote!


I've bought some as well. On hindsight, better to put on hold first ah...
Wait for the dust to settle first.

Last time people said China/India can cushion the effect. A load of rubbish! US is still the biggest economy and is now in trouble, affecting whole world!

Stay sidelines and enjoy the coming olympic.
 
 
lookcc
    12-Jul-2008 15:04  
Contact    Quote!
wud wait, 2.55 mayb can get but mayb cannot.
 

 
lucky168
    12-Jul-2008 01:51  
Contact    Quote!


In my opinion, this stock is able to give out consistently 5-6% div every year based on current px, so can consider.

another one would be comfort delgro/
 
 
CheeryVGoh
    11-Jul-2008 18:30  
Contact    Quote!

DJ ST Engineering Sees Growth Potential In Mkt Slowdown - Report



 

Written By Dow Jones Newswires on 04 Jul 2008

 



 



 

 

 

 

 

SINGAPORE (Dow Jones)–The impact of the aviation industry slowdown on Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd. (S63.SG) is "minimal if at all," and could provide growth opportunities, the Business Times reported, quoting Chief Executive Tan Pheng Hock.

 

"Today is the best time to look at acquisitions to get access to markets and technology," Tan told the paper. "For the last four years we have been buying companies, and this period may well be a good opportunity to accelerate the plan."

 

ST Aerospace, the company’s aerospace arm, contributes about half of ST Engineering’s revenue and more than half of its profit, the paper said.

 

Tan also said ST Aerospace was interested in a US$1 billion deal to service Lion Air’s new fleet of Boeings. The Straits Times reported Thursday that the ST Engineering unit was competing with Germany’s Deutsche Lufthansa AG (LHA.XE) and the Air France-KLM (3112.FR) unit KLM, quoting Lion Air President Director Rusdi Kirana.

 



 

 
 
kruxsj
    11-Jul-2008 17:06  
Contact    Quote!
great info ! yes bearish for now but bullish this counter long term and in volatile times like now good to park in defensive good div stock, just my views...
 

 
AK_Francis
    11-Jul-2008 16:24  
Contact    Quote!


hmm, as far as Mr Tee remains in power, Tamasick will survive.

Seletar aviation hub will be commences operation in 18-24 mths time, if not mistaken.

Yrs long order for aircraft conversion orders and possible bringin in JSF F35 to the defence arena.

All the above could be a booster for this burger, AK guess.  
 
 
178investors
    11-Jul-2008 15:03  
Contact    Quote!


Anyone here can advise what's the business outlook for STEng in the next 12-24mths?
 
 
CWQuah
    11-Jul-2008 13:23  
Contact    Quote!
Monday and Tuesday will be critical for the markets. Either make or break. As for ST Engg, I'll see if 2.66 is validated as a support. Must see a real test before engaging it.
 
 
redash
    11-Jul-2008 13:02  
Contact    Quote!


Thks CWQ!

Double check with ya cuz some TA shows conflicting signals at 2.65 support and 2.74 resistance...

2.54~2.58 appears on one of the TA i am using, I initially dismiss that cuz I thought this is an STI stock and someone will prevent that kind of drop...

Now since you mentioned that... better just stand at safety zone and watch the fighting

 

XoI
 

 
CWQuah
    11-Jul-2008 12:51  
Contact    Quote!

I agree on the support at 2.66. Previous lows are there. But a break below will probably lead to further drops to 2.55.

Avoid. The downtrend is NOT over yet. STI up yet ST Engg down.

The previous support of 2.75 has been invalidated. Resistance at 2.7, 2.73.



redash      ( Date: 11-Jul-2008 11:50) Posted:



a new low...2.68...

Support range of 2.65~2.66 and resistance at 2.69~2.7 ,

Is that correct QW?

~A check on my TA analysis thats all

=)

 

 
 
trader88.sg
    11-Jul-2008 12:25  
Contact    Quote!
 
 
redash
    11-Jul-2008 11:50  
Contact    Quote!


a new low...2.68...

Support range of 2.65~2.66 and resistance at 2.69~2.7 ,

Is that correct QW?

~A check on my TA analysis thats all

=)

 
 
 
elfinchilde
    11-Jul-2008 01:19  
Contact    Quote!


eh. no naked short, no contra. it's risk management for me; part of the discipline. one can predict the trend, but to have to predict it within a fixed time frame, you're only adding on extra parameters for error.

the only time i'd ever do shorting is if i get a cfd acct; even then, i'd be very cautious how and on which stock.

on the whole, i prefer to focus on one direction, though i can call both ways since the techs are the same. but the more white noise you eliminate, the simpler you keep your system, the better the chances of consistent success.
 
 
AK_Francis
    11-Jul-2008 00:42  
Contact    Quote!
dun worry loh, this burger big brother is Defence arena, both local n foreign. iron rice bowl.
 

 
HLJHLJ
    11-Jul-2008 00:36  
Contact    Quote!

Thanks. Did not about this. Still quite new in this area.
One qn, for CFD, my friend told me if short, do not have to pay interest whereas have to pay when long. True? Don't seem to make sense to me. I thought by shorting using CFD, we are borrow scripts ==> must pay charges.

Which is better? CFD or share borrowing?

Maybe not for me as they are all very nerve-racking.
Anyway, your answers to my qns are appreciated.



trader88.sg      ( Date: 10-Jul-2008 13:13) Posted:

Oh, you are referring to naked short.

Good traders do not naked short, the risk is simply too high because the controllable time frame is restricted to intra-day. Beyond the trading session, the open positions are subject to buying-in by the exchange, which is not favourable to the naked shortists most of the time.

To go short on stocks, CFD or Share-borrowing are the only 2 practical methods. 



HLJHLJ      ( Date: 10-Jul-2008 12:46) Posted:

Thanks. What I meant was the time frames to cover up weredifferent.
I think short is 1 day, long is T+3. Am I right?
If this is true, then mathematically, the probabilities are then different, everything other things being equal.

Just my thought only.



 
 
CWQuah
    10-Jul-2008 17:16  
Contact    Quote!


Isn't it interesting how 2.75 is so significant?

 
 
 
cyjjerry85
    10-Jul-2008 17:07  
Contact    Quote!
Time Last Volume Buy/Sell
17:05:02 2.760 381,000 Buy Up
 
 
CWQuah
    10-Jul-2008 15:39  
Contact    Quote!
Expect more selling pressure. 2.75 turned resistance. Current day high 2.74. Made new low of 2.69.

CWQuah      ( Date: 08-Jul-2008 17:03) Posted:

Expect more selling if this closes at 2.74. If the BBs are still there then this may close 2.75/6.

 
 
trader88.sg
    10-Jul-2008 13:13  
Contact    Quote!

Oh, you are referring to naked short.

Good traders do not naked short, the risk is simply too high because the controllable time frame is restricted to intra-day. Beyond the trading session, the open positions are subject to buying-in by the exchange, which is not favourable to the naked shortists most of the time.

To go short on stocks, CFD or Share-borrowing are the only 2 practical methods. 



HLJHLJ      ( Date: 10-Jul-2008 12:46) Posted:

Thanks. What I meant was the time frames to cover up weredifferent.
I think short is 1 day, long is T+3. Am I right?
If this is true, then mathematically, the probabilities are then different, everything other things being equal.

Just my thought only.



trader88.sg      ( Date: 10-Jul-2008 08:27) Posted:



Odds mainly against her for shorting?

I do not think so. If you stick to TA, going long and going short will have the same probability of making profit.  


 
Important: Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy .