Home
Login Register
GLD USD    Last:431.0    +6.44

Gold going up this year?

 Post Reply 621-640 of 1037
 
cheongwee
    11-May-2009 23:13  
Contact    Quote!


 

http://www.silverfatcat.com/

Robert Kiyosaki..Mike Maloney
 
 
lookcc
    07-May-2009 21:33  
Contact    Quote!
agreed, tis is a possibility.
 
 
iPunter
    07-May-2009 21:22  
Contact    Quote!


I mean the stock market...

Judging by the way the ferociousness of charge, there may not even be the chance for a double bottom...Smiley
 

 
lookcc
    07-May-2009 20:55  
Contact    Quote!
4 gold or d stk mkts or 4 both.
 
 
iPunter
    07-May-2009 20:52  
Contact    Quote!
The signs are this may be a runaway bull market... Smiley
 
 
cheongwee
    07-May-2009 19:17  
Contact    Quote!


Dollar up...stock up..but gold also up???...something wrong..the last time this happen i got trap...and those angmoh gold bug said it is manipulated...

it could be another bull trap....it was reported that invester thk inflation returning since economy is improving..

let see it cross 930..if not then 780 by end summer..which i normaally do my shopping for cheap stock.

if trade . set a cut lose...always,
 

 
cheongwee
    06-May-2009 18:29  
Contact    Quote!


this guy say take bank yrs to recover...read

 

To 321gold home page

Home   Links   Editorials

How Much of Banks' Earnings Are Real?



Thomas Tan
May 5, 2009


Last month, many banks reported strong earnings. Market sentiment has changed substantially. Only a few months ago, the collapse of the whole US banking industry threatened to bring the whole global economy down. Now, suddenly, the picture looks rosier than ever and this financial crisis seems to be over.

Or is it?

With very limited transparency of bank earnings, there are several so-called earnings areas investors should question whether they are sustainable, and a few other areas investors should ask whether they are even real. They are as follows:
  1. The sudden increase of financing activities on residential mortgages. Thanks to the historically low mortgage rates at Q1, some home owners have been refinancing their mortgages, resulting in both spread and fees contributing to bank's earnings. This trend could spill into Q2, but unlikely further. About one out of 5 home owners in this country are under water, meaning their home value falling below their mortgages, which in turn means they are unable to refinance. I also believe real estate has another three years to fall, until 2012, at the national basis (see my previous article "The Real Estate Apocalypse" here), further discouraging any new home buying and sending more home owners under water. I expect this part of the bank earnings is temporary and short-lived.
  2. Bank analyst, Michael Mayo said last month, "Mortgage-related losses are about halfway to their peak, while credit-card and consumer losses are only a third of the way to their expected highest levels. While certain mortgage problems are farther along, other areas are likely to accelerate, reflecting a rolling recession by asset class." He also estimated for the whole US banking industry, the total bad loans could be at the range of $7 - $11 trillion, or 3.5 - 5.5% of all loans, worse than the 3.4% peak at the great depression. We have written off only about 2% so far, about the 4th inning of a 9 inning game. There will still be a very long and dark night ahead. Same as real estate, I believe it won't be until 2012 that banks would be getting close to the end of the asset write-off process.
  3. Banks postponing charges to earnings for their loan and credit losses. Write-off due to their loan and credit losses by banks is a very discretionary, arbitrary and dedicated process. Most importantly, it is a delayed process. When rates fall, their portfolio rise in value immediately which they reflect in their Q1 financial statement, but they delay to mark down the value of the credit losses until they can't hide them anymore. They realize if they really reflect the real and true losses, their equities, including the huge investment by US government bailout money, will show up as a negative number. In other words, all the taxpayers' money disappears from this money pit of the banking industry. Neither banks nor government wants to show that to the public. So it is totally normal to hear that the head of US Treasury and the Chairman of Fed actively engaged and fraudulently threatened Bank of America NOT to disclose losses at Merrill Lynch to their shareholders.
  4. Changing the mark-to-market accounting principal. This process is now further delayed from coercive efforts by both banks and government to deviate from mark-to-market accounting principal, letting banks to assign favorable value as they want to their portfolio which will be written off in future days. Banks are deliberately running write-offs behind the actual defaults, contrary to at the beginning of the banking crisis when they at least were at little more honest about the real losses. Now during Q1, when banks raised the value of their toxic assets, they book them as earnings. For example, Bank of America last year took over Merrill Lynch and in Q1 it increased the value of Merrill's assets to prices higher than Merrill kept them, booking a $2.2 billion gain in the process. They are all paper 'gains' for one accounting period for the sole purpose of painting a rosy picture.
  5. Taking advantage of 'creative' accounting loopholes. One loophole is to book earnings while your debt is actually losing value. A good case here is Citigroup, which last week ended a five-quarter losing streak, took advantage of an accounting rule that allows companies to record declines in the market value of their own debt as an unrealized gain. That turned a $900 million loss into a $1.6 billion gain. It is a scam of being rich by losing money, and we can't call it a Ponzi scam anymore and have to find a new name for it. Another trick is to set aside lower loss reserves. Well Fargo set aside just $4.6 billion for potential loan losses. According to banking analyst Paul Miller, the real losses should be around $6.25 billion, which helped boost its earnings by as much as $824 million. Miller said that the bank was "under-reserving for expected future losses", adding that investors should "demand better disclosures."
  6. Switching to calendar year reporting. The best award for accounting abuse, however, goes to Goldman Sachs. But switching to a calendar year from a fiscal year ending November, suddenly the credit losses of $780 million disappeared from both 2008 report and Q1 2009 report, nowhere to be seen in the future. Of course, this has driven the stock price way up, a perfect timing to dump more shares to the public as far as they are suckers out there. This happened before when Blackstone was conducting IPO dumping shares at the peak of the equity market with many investors so hungry about putting money into private equity firms. Bankers are really smart and public is pigs waiting to be slaughtered.
  7. Using credit default swap (CDS) to book earnings. In one of my old articles 'Why Wall St. Needed CDS?' here, [pdf] I indicated how banks have used CDS to book fake earnings, now they have found another way to use CDS, even better than the accounting trick of negative basis trading. The unwinding of CDS contracts related to AIG led to huge gains for the major banks for Q1. Those profits have been shown in fixed-income trading, gains that will not be reproduced for future quarters. This is why most of the 'earnings' are concentrated under trading 'profits' at their financial statement, since they can't manipulate banking fees (relying on number of deals being done), which is public information. But trading activities are not required to be transparent and reported to the public. However, if you check activities of the trading desks at major banks, there was little trading volume during Q1 at all, so where were the 'profits' coming from? CDS handily came over to help one more time. Most of these 'profits' are actually coming from AIG, or our bailout money given by government to AIG, now being funneled through and then recorded as 'earnings' by major banks during the unwinding process of CDS wild bets between AIG and major banks in past years. This is really a special time for capitalism; public taxpayer's money suddenly becoming private earnings for banks. It is again time to pay more bonuses out to bankers for such a great creativity.


Many people argue that banks will eventually 'earn their way out' of their losses. First of all, the record lower interest rate, thus the huge spread earned by the banks today, might not be sustainable. Interest rate will go high, and spread will shrink to squeeze any such earnings left.

Even at the best case scenario for banks, the interest rate and spread stay this way forever, the current debt is still about 4 times of our GDP. If we use 3.5-5.5% losses estimated by Michael Mayo, the total losses are about 14-22% of our GDP. In order to fill this giant hole, a fund manager made a quick calculation with the best scenario of record corporate profit margin and zero consumer savings, like the good old days, and it will still take over a decade for banks to complete this so-called 'earn their way out' process. In my previous article here, I indicated that the banking industry will stay flat at this level at range bound for the next 20 years, which now doesn't seem to be far-fetched at all.

May 4, 2009
Thomas Tan, CFA, MBA
email: thomast2@optonline.net
www.investorwalk.com


Disclaimer: The
 
 
cheongwee
    06-May-2009 18:08  
Contact    Quote!


with Europe in -ve growth, ECB will cut rate for sure,, so US$ will strengthen, so u thk gold come down?right? ..no, u r wrong..

gold will be play up to 920 to 930 before it corrected to 780..my prediction ,
 
 
cheongweee
    05-May-2009 15:59  
Contact    Quote!
if gold still cannot cross 920, convincingly, then it will correct to ard 780..we be seeing that within days..
 
 
richtan
    05-May-2009 11:38  
Contact    Quote!

Yes, I had read this writeup before, note his disclaimer:

This implies that we may (no guarantees here) see lower prices in the precious metals in the following days.

Of course the market might prove me wrong, as nobody can be right 100% of the time



cheongweee      ( Date: 05-May-2009 04:25) Posted:



To richtan...this may of interest to u and some ppl here..

Precious Metals Correlations - Next Step in the Multi-market Analysis

By Przemyslaw Radomski      Printer Friendly Version Bookmark and Share
May 4 2009 1:07PM

www.sunshineprofits.com

As you already know, it is usually best to analyze many markets, even if you are really interested in only few of them. After all, given today's level of globalization in the world economy and in financial markets, it is not uncommon to see most (!) markets plunge or soar at the same time. I've written about this phenomenon in the essay dedicated to gold market's fundamentals, so I don't want to repeat myself here.

Analyzing many markets already gives us advantage over most investors, who focus on gold or silver only, but I don't want to stop just there. In order to make this multi-market analysis even more efficient, I try to estimate the strength of "influence" that particular non-PM market has on gold, silver and corresponding equities. Consequently, I’m able to pay greater attention to markets that are more important at particular moment. One of the ways to measure the strength of the aforementioned "influence" is to use the linear correlation coefficient. I have put "influence" into quotation marks, because the correlation coefficient does not tell us which market influences which - still, we have the common sense to know that the price of gold determines earnings and therefore share prices of gold mining companies, not the other way around.

What this number really tells us, is "how much" have the markets moved together in the past, without telling us why this has taken place. This "correlation number" takes values from -1 to 1. If it has a negative value it means that this correlation is negative - two markets on average move in the opposite direction. If the "correlation number" is positive, then it means that these two markets move in the same direction on average.

Before I continue, I believe a technical digression is needed. I would not recommend using correlation coefficients to calculate the exact sizes of one’s positions or to estimate the size of the position that one would want to hedge. Most statistical coefficients (including the one mentioned in this essay) are biased as a result of assuming normal distribution of returns. It does not pose a serious threat as long as you only use the results for comparison or to as an additional technique. One should also check the raw data for rare (but significant) events.

To better understand the concept of the correlation coefficient, please consider the following example. I suppose that nobody will argue with the fact that gold and silver move in the same direction on average. If we calculated the value of correlation coefficient for gold and silver it would certainly be positive. You can tell the strength of the correlation by looking how far it is from 0. For example during last year (+/- 250 trading days) gold and S&P Index have moved rather independently from each other and the correlation value is very close to 0 (it equaled 0.08 on April 24th). On the other hand, HUI Index has moved rather in tune with the price of gold, so the correlation coefficient for the previous year equaled 0.67. Please take a look at the table below.

I have calculated values of correlation coefficient for gold, silver and PM stocks with USD Index and the general stock market (S&P Index). I have grouped the results into columns, depending on how much data I have used to calculate a particular number. The first one has been calculated for the previous two weeks (10 trading days), whereas the last one has been calculated for the previous year (+/- 250 trading days)

The column, which one should analyze depends on what one wants to know. If you're a long-term Investor who wants to analyze the long-term trends, one should go with the last column that is created by calculating data from the previous 250 trading days (about a year). On the other hand, Day-Traders should focus on the 30-day long column or even the 10-day one (though this one is not statistically significant, but that is another matter).

The point is that not only do the prices on various markets change and should be analyzed in different time-frames, but the same applies to the way markets influence each other. The important thing here is that prices and correlations don't necessarily change at the same time. Therefore, when we see that we are getting closer to a particular turning point in gold, silver or corresponding equities, we may check what the key markets are - at that particular moment. This will tell us what might serve as a catalyst for either breakout or breakdown, which consequently increases our chances of making a correct decision. In other words, analyzing these key markets should provide us with more information about future prices and trends, than analyzing other, non-key markets.

The table above tells us several obvious things (thus indicating that this type of analysis makes sense), and several new ones. As far as the former are concerned, please note that the correlation between gold and gold stocks is always positive, meaning that gold and gold stocks tend to move in the same direction - which is obvious, and that does not add much to what we already know. On the other hand, we see several interesting points.

Gold has been lately (30- and 90-day correlation) trading rather in tune with the general stock market (naturally in the opposite direction), but it seems that gold is going to trade more independently in the future. The 10-day correlation equaled mere 0.07 which means that in the very recent past gold moved rather independently from the general stock market. As I've mentioned earlier, 10 days is not enough data to make any detailed claims, but it's enough for us to be suspicious regarding the previously prevailing correlation.

In the April 3rd Premium Update, I wrote:

It is difficult to say, when will markets stop perceiving U.S. Dollars as a safe haven, but I will monitor this situation and report to you accordingly. For now, the direct implication is that for now, signals for the USD market do not automatically translate into signals for gold/silver.

At the moment, it (once again) seems that gold is resuming its normal, negative correlation with the dollar (as measured by the USD Index). This, accompanied by already strong negative correlation USD - silver and USD - HUI, is more than enough to make me get back to my regular USD analysis. Although, this is not yet certain, not-analyzing the USD market may be costly.

Summing up, there is no strong proof yet, but it seems that the precious metals market is once again looking more at the USD Index, than at the general stock market. This does not mean that "from now on, the dollar market is all there is to the precious metals market", but it indicates that divergences between the dollar market and the precious metals market should once again be viewed as important. The general stock market is still relevant in our analysis, but we may need to look at the dollar market for more meaningful signals. Since USD Index has not broken down through its rising support trend line, the short-term trend remains up. This implies that we may (no guarantees here) see lower prices in the precious metals in the following days.

Of course the market might prove me wrong, as nobody can be right 100% of the time. To make sure that you know my thoughts (including information not mentioned here) on the market as soon as I post them, I suggest signing up for my free mailing list. Sign up today and you’ll also get 24 hours of access to the Premium Sections on my website (including tools and charts dedicated to PM investors and speculators). It’s free and you may unregister easily.

Additionally, you will be able to see the correlation table with up-to-date coefficients.

P. Radomski
Editor
Sunshine Profits

 


 

 
cheongweee
    05-May-2009 04:25  
Contact    Quote!


To richtan...this may of interest to u and some ppl here..

Precious Metals Correlations - Next Step in the Multi-market Analysis

By Przemyslaw Radomski      Printer Friendly Version Bookmark and Share
May 4 2009 1:07PM

www.sunshineprofits.com

As you already know, it is usually best to analyze many markets, even if you are really interested in only few of them. After all, given today's level of globalization in the world economy and in financial markets, it is not uncommon to see most (!) markets plunge or soar at the same time. I've written about this phenomenon in the essay dedicated to gold market's fundamentals, so I don't want to repeat myself here.

Analyzing many markets already gives us advantage over most investors, who focus on gold or silver only, but I don't want to stop just there. In order to make this multi-market analysis even more efficient, I try to estimate the strength of "influence" that particular non-PM market has on gold, silver and corresponding equities. Consequently, I’m able to pay greater attention to markets that are more important at particular moment. One of the ways to measure the strength of the aforementioned "influence" is to use the linear correlation coefficient. I have put "influence" into quotation marks, because the correlation coefficient does not tell us which market influences which - still, we have the common sense to know that the price of gold determines earnings and therefore share prices of gold mining companies, not the other way around.

What this number really tells us, is "how much" have the markets moved together in the past, without telling us why this has taken place. This "correlation number" takes values from -1 to 1. If it has a negative value it means that this correlation is negative - two markets on average move in the opposite direction. If the "correlation number" is positive, then it means that these two markets move in the same direction on average.

Before I continue, I believe a technical digression is needed. I would not recommend using correlation coefficients to calculate the exact sizes of one’s positions or to estimate the size of the position that one would want to hedge. Most statistical coefficients (including the one mentioned in this essay) are biased as a result of assuming normal distribution of returns. It does not pose a serious threat as long as you only use the results for comparison or to as an additional technique. One should also check the raw data for rare (but significant) events.

To better understand the concept of the correlation coefficient, please consider the following example. I suppose that nobody will argue with the fact that gold and silver move in the same direction on average. If we calculated the value of correlation coefficient for gold and silver it would certainly be positive. You can tell the strength of the correlation by looking how far it is from 0. For example during last year (+/- 250 trading days) gold and S&P Index have moved rather independently from each other and the correlation value is very close to 0 (it equaled 0.08 on April 24th). On the other hand, HUI Index has moved rather in tune with the price of gold, so the correlation coefficient for the previous year equaled 0.67. Please take a look at the table below.

I have calculated values of correlation coefficient for gold, silver and PM stocks with USD Index and the general stock market (S&P Index). I have grouped the results into columns, depending on how much data I have used to calculate a particular number. The first one has been calculated for the previous two weeks (10 trading days), whereas the last one has been calculated for the previous year (+/- 250 trading days)

The column, which one should analyze depends on what one wants to know. If you're a long-term Investor who wants to analyze the long-term trends, one should go with the last column that is created by calculating data from the previous 250 trading days (about a year). On the other hand, Day-Traders should focus on the 30-day long column or even the 10-day one (though this one is not statistically significant, but that is another matter).

The point is that not only do the prices on various markets change and should be analyzed in different time-frames, but the same applies to the way markets influence each other. The important thing here is that prices and correlations don't necessarily change at the same time. Therefore, when we see that we are getting closer to a particular turning point in gold, silver or corresponding equities, we may check what the key markets are - at that particular moment. This will tell us what might serve as a catalyst for either breakout or breakdown, which consequently increases our chances of making a correct decision. In other words, analyzing these key markets should provide us with more information about future prices and trends, than analyzing other, non-key markets.

The table above tells us several obvious things (thus indicating that this type of analysis makes sense), and several new ones. As far as the former are concerned, please note that the correlation between gold and gold stocks is always positive, meaning that gold and gold stocks tend to move in the same direction - which is obvious, and that does not add much to what we already know. On the other hand, we see several interesting points.

Gold has been lately (30- and 90-day correlation) trading rather in tune with the general stock market (naturally in the opposite direction), but it seems that gold is going to trade more independently in the future. The 10-day correlation equaled mere 0.07 which means that in the very recent past gold moved rather independently from the general stock market. As I've mentioned earlier, 10 days is not enough data to make any detailed claims, but it's enough for us to be suspicious regarding the previously prevailing correlation.

In the April 3rd Premium Update, I wrote:

It is difficult to say, when will markets stop perceiving U.S. Dollars as a safe haven, but I will monitor this situation and report to you accordingly. For now, the direct implication is that for now, signals for the USD market do not automatically translate into signals for gold/silver.

At the moment, it (once again) seems that gold is resuming its normal, negative correlation with the dollar (as measured by the USD Index). This, accompanied by already strong negative correlation USD - silver and USD - HUI, is more than enough to make me get back to my regular USD analysis. Although, this is not yet certain, not-analyzing the USD market may be costly.

Summing up, there is no strong proof yet, but it seems that the precious metals market is once again looking more at the USD Index, than at the general stock market. This does not mean that "from now on, the dollar market is all there is to the precious metals market", but it indicates that divergences between the dollar market and the precious metals market should once again be viewed as important. The general stock market is still relevant in our analysis, but we may need to look at the dollar market for more meaningful signals. Since USD Index has not broken down through its rising support trend line, the short-term trend remains up. This implies that we may (no guarantees here) see lower prices in the precious metals in the following days.

Of course the market might prove me wrong, as nobody can be right 100% of the time. To make sure that you know my thoughts (including information not mentioned here) on the market as soon as I post them, I suggest signing up for my free mailing list. Sign up today and you’ll also get 24 hours of access to the Premium Sections on my website (including tools and charts dedicated to PM investors and speculators). It’s free and you may unregister easily.

Additionally, you will be able to see the correlation table with up-to-date coefficients.

P. Radomski
Editor
Sunshine Profits

 

 
 
cheongweee
    05-May-2009 02:30  
Contact    Quote!


in fact, in S$ term, the sing dollar have strengthen to 1.47..so we dont really profit much, esp silver..

that is why stock is still the better choice for precious metal investment...buy them in end summer when gold is 780..hopefully.
 
 
cheongweee
    05-May-2009 02:27  
Contact    Quote!
i still like to predict gold to correct to ard 780 in end sept...fr 2003 to 2008 ,the trend is very clear...only in fall gold will rally till spring.
 
 
richtan
    05-May-2009 01:27  
Contact    Quote!


From: http://www.preciousmetalstockreview.com/downloads/May%202,%202009%20pdf.pdf

Gold fell only 3.27% on the month which on the surface is respectable.

On this log scale monthly chart all trend-lines are solid and strong. There

aren’t too many other markets or stocks you can say the same about. The two

lines on top denote the neckline of the massive head and shoulders pattern.

Certain technicians could use either line as the neck so they are both there for

your viewing pleasure. Basically the $1,000 line is the where gold will either

blast o

The lighting bolts that hit gold this week still have the hair on the back of

my neck upright. I don’t often publish charts showing intraday movements but

this week was among the most blatant weeks that gold was obviously taken

down at the same time, to the same degree on two days.



For years now it’s been an obvious, disingenuous trend that gold hasGATA but not many others are willing to admit itfficial mentors, Bill Murphy, get so

risen in the east and fallen in the west. Many times at the exact moment the NY

markets open. This week the Tuesday and Thursday trading was pretty sick to

keep it publishable. Why would the price be taken down the day before and

after the FOMC meeting at the exact same time to the exact same degree? I

know the answer and so does

yet.

The other thing I would like you to look at in the chart is the end of the

NY trade where no other world markets are yet open. You have to have a pretty

big line and either be an institution or have very good connections to trade this

thin market. So many times over the course of this bull market the price has

traded well all day only to be moved around, usually lower, in the Globex

market where volume is low.

So many including one of my uno

aggravated by this type of action. To me its inevitable that gold and silver will

continue their bull markets and I am actually grateful for more time to buy at

low prices. But so many do take it personally and get upset even some of my

subscribers and correspondents want action now. I can’t move the market and

don’t care to. This market is taking it’s sweet time moving, whether that be it’s

or it is being forced upon it matters not. Too many want riches now

and today. Patience is a virtue and makes life easier and less stressful. Gold

and silver will go much, much higher and shake out the many weak hands who

jump in as it roars and complain and sell losing money when it contracts. We

are years from the blow o

right and sit tight.

That’s been my motto for years now and I am sticking to it. Gold has

risen on average over 16% a year for the last eight years. Last weekend I had

the pleasure of hitting the road on two wheels with a few friends to a friends

cabin on the lake. After the day exploring the area, over steak and a few beers I

had to ask if anyone knew of an investment that has appreciated at 16% a year

over the last eight. Of coarse the dentist among us knew as we talk about such

things but nobody else knew. The others kind of looked cockeyed at me when I

said physical gold in your hand. The pulp mill worker didn’t care much to talk

about anything but bikes, the retired cop is broke but the dentist knew and

knows where to put his money, the CSI investigator gave me a look only a true

investigator could. I am sure he’s on the case and will have to see that for

himself.

The point is not many people yet are investing in the metals market, but

they will. God knows they wish they had already, but that is besides the point.

The real moves are yet to come, and no matter what happens day to day I care

not, for the trend cannot be a
ff top. As the great Jesse Livermore says; Know you’reffected indefinitely.
ff or have it’s launch cancelled for another day.

 
 
richtan
    03-May-2009 15:44  
Contact    Quote!
Read below writeup about China & Gold.
 
Good for S-chips like Hongxin (retail), Miidas (Aluminium train bodies), other selective good S-chips & gold

Great News, Plus China, Asia, Gold …

The Chinese are spending like crazy! Retail sales shot up 15.2 percent for the first two months of this year.
The Chinese are spending like crazy! Retail sales shot up 15.2 percent for the first two months of this year.


2. Unlike U.S. and European consumers, China’s consumers are spending. China’s retail sales for January and February jumped 15.2 percent overall, with urban sales up 14.4 percent and rural sales up 17 percent.

Total first-quarter retail sales jumped 15 percent in the urban areas and 17 percent in the rural countryside. Auto sales for March surged an amazing 27.2 percent!

Meanwhile, there are also signs that China’s property markets are picking back up. Luxury property prices are on the rise again, climbing 2.1 percent so far this year, while property transactions overall jumped nearly 60 percent over February’s pace.

Home sales in Shanghai totaled 1.5 million square meters in March — a whopping 91 percent increase over January.

3. Unlike the rest of the world, China’s (and most other Asian countries’) reserves continue to grow. Despite a slump in exports, almost all of Asia continues to see growth in their monetary reserves, with China’s piggy-bank just recently hitting $2 trillion.

Moreover, from China to Thailand … from South Korea to Indonesia — taxes are being cut virtually across the board … massive fiscal stimulus is being applied … and domestic consumption is being stoked, big time.

My view: If you acted on my suggestions and have some long positions in Chinese stocks or funds, hold! I expect further gains in Asia.

Gold News …

Did you see the news on China increasing its gold reserves by a whopping 76 percent, or 654 metric tonnes (23,069,171 ounces) since 2003?

It’s amazing to me that so many investors and analysts are surprised by this. I stated as early as 2002 that China would be drastically upping its gold reserves … that it would not tell anyone it was doing so for quite some time … and that eventually, China would come to own probably the largest gold reserves in the world.

China is stocking up on gold and could end up with the largest gold reserves in the world.
China is stocking up on gold and could end up with the largest gold reserves in the world.


And in the same October 9 issue of Money and Markets that I referenced above, I stated that “the authorities in Beijing are no dummies. They also know the U.S. dollar is in a long-term downtrend. So, they have only one choice: Bolster the country’s gold reserves while they’re investing in U.S. Treasuries.”

Seems like that’s exactly what they’ve been doing — for years. And likely will continue to do.

While I suggest you stay out of U.S. Treasury notes and bonds, my position on gold remains the same: It’s one of the best investments you will ever make.

Best wishes for your health and wealth,

Larry
 

 
richtan
    03-May-2009 14:31  
Contact    Quote!

Bullish Gold market commentary by James Turk


GoldMoney Alert - 26 April 2009

Gold's Strong Technical Position



The outlook for gold remains bullish. Central bank 'printing presses' are running at full steam trying to keep up with those governments around the world that are spending more money than they have or are likely to collect in taxes. China's announcement on Friday that it has increased its gold reserves by 76 percent to 1,054 tonnes is yet another important piece of bullish fundamental news for gold. It is therefore not surprising that gold is in a strong technical position too, as we can see from the following chart.

chart

This chart shows that gold remains in an uptrend. In fact, this uptrend is accelerating. Note that the green line marking the uptrend is curving upward, indicating that momentum is building.

Gold is also above its 200-day moving average, which is always a positive factor. But there is another fascinating development that needs to be considered. Gold is forming a 'head & shoulders' pattern, which can be clearly seen on the following chart that presents gold's daily New York close since the beginning of 2007.

chart

H&S patterns normally indicate a reversal of a trend. After a long bull run, a H&S top will form to reflect distribution. In other words, buying power has been exhausted and is being overtaken by selling pressure. Prices are simply too high and cannot be sustained because they no longer represent an acceptable value.

A reverse H&S pattern (with the neckline above the head and shoulders) forms at a bear market bottom. Selling pressure is exhausted and is being overtaken by buying power, which is the result of the numerous bargains that become available at the end of the bear market.

Here is the fascinating development in gold. It is forming a reverse H&S, but gold is in a bullish uptrend, not a bear market bottom. The reverse H&S is appearing as a continuation pattern, which is very rare.

The only logical interpretation of this reverse H&S pattern is that gold represents exceptional value, as if it were at a bear market bottom. A bold interpretation would be that a 3-digit gold price will soon be an historical artifact, just like the 2-digit gold price.

Take a close look again at the chart immediately above. The neckline of the reverse H&S pattern is approximately $1,000. The left shoulder and head are complete. The right shoulder is now forming.

What's more, note the red downtrend line in the right shoulder going back to the February 2009 high. When that line is hurdled, it would be logical to expect that gold will continue higher and complete the right shoulder. The next logical step would be for gold to immediately thereafter break above $1,000.

Maybe I should say "if" that red downtrend line is hurdled because nothing is certain when it comes to markets. But it seems that there is a high probability the red downtrend line will be hurdled soon, possibly this week. So perhaps $1,000 gold may be just around the corner.


Published by GoldMoney
Copyright © 2009. All rights reserved.
Edited by James Turk

tirami      ( Date: 03-May-2009 13:22) Posted:



looking at a more updated chart, it seems gold could be going down soon, or it already has?


 http://skybach.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/gold-or-oil/

 
 
tirami
    03-May-2009 13:22  
Contact    Quote!


looking at a more updated chart, it seems gold could be going down soon, or it already has?


 http://skybach.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/gold-or-oil/
 
 
cheongwee
    01-May-2009 01:13  
Contact    Quote!
this will be the third attempt to cross 920..it could be a bull trap...DYODD
 
 
cheongwee
    30-Apr-2009 17:48  
Contact    Quote!


if 920 to 930..and hard to crossover to 960..then it will correct to 760 to 800...

i believe the dow will rally, and gold to correct into summer before it thrust up again..DYODD

 
 
 
cheongwee
    29-Apr-2009 20:07  
Contact    Quote!
previous post, the guy recommend Timmin Gold..a penny, but i have check, they are heavily gear and lose making stock...dont buy....unless u like to speculate..in other word ..gamble.
 
Important: Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy .