
Yes. Temasek is vested. So am i...
Very good fundamental. Looking at the trading pattern since listing, will need time for it to move however...
ANALYST CERTIFICATION AND REQUIRED DISCLOSURES BEGIN ON PAGE 5 1
1Rating Buy 2
Buy 2Prior: Not Rated
Global Equity Research
Price target US$0.95
US$0.95Prior:Not Rated
UBS Investment Research
Chemil Energy Limited
Fuelling growth [EXTRACT]
Leading global supplier of marine fuel products
Leading global supplier of marine fuel productsWe initiate coverage of Chemoil Energy (Chemoil), one of the largest independent
providers of marine fuel products globally, with a Buy 2 rating. The business is
volume driven, where scale economies, access to credit, and a strong sourcing and
distribution network are key to superior profitability. Chemoil has achieved the
largest market share in major US bunker ports and it has an established presence in
the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp region, Singapore, and Panama.
Well positioned for strong earnings growth
Well positioned for strong earnings growthWe believe earnings growth will be driven by market share gains at existing ports,
leading to improving asset turn. We expect Chemoil to enter new markets, and
believe industry dynamics justify its strategy: 1) oil majors are de-emphasising
low-yielding businesses, such as bunkering, in favour of upstream investments;
and 2) high bunker prices are squeezing out competitors that have weaker balance
sheets.
Key risks: sharp fall in bunker prices, supply disruption
Key risks: sharp fall in bunker prices, supply disruptionMargins are thin and could be hurt by: 1) sharp declines in the bunker price if
hedging is imperfect, as Chemoil typically holds seven days of unsold inventory;
2) supply disruptions; and 3) aggressive price wars with competitors.
Valuation: price target of US$0.95 based on discounted FCF
Valuation: price target of US$0.95 based on discounted FCFWe value Chemoil at US$0.95/share based on the discounted value of its free cash
flow to equity, using a 9.2% COE discount rate and assuming 3% terminal growth.
Highlights (US$m) 12/05 12/06 12/07E 12/08E 12/09E
Revenues 3,674 4,346 4,898 5,626 6,183
3,674 4,346 4,898 5,626 6,183EBIT (UBS) 67 87 109 134 158
67 87 109 134 158Net income (UBS) 49 58 77 92 110
49 58 77 92 110EPS (UBS, US$) 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09
0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09Net DPS (UBS, US$) 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02Profitability & Valuation 5-yr hist. av. 12/06 12/07E 12/08E 12/09E
EBIT margin % - 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6
- 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6ROIC (EBIT) % - 29.0 22.9 20.0 20.4
- 29.0 22.9 20.0 20.4EV/EBITDA x - 9.3 7.2 6.3 5.7
- 9.3 7.2 6.3 5.7PE (UBS) x - 10.7 8.7 7.3 6.1
- 10.7 8.7 7.3 6.1Net dividend yield % - 1.8 2.5 3.0 3.6
- 1.8 2.5 3.0 3.6Source: Company accounts, Thomson Financial, UBS estimates. (UBS) valuations are stated before goodwill, exceptionals and other special items.
Valuations: based on an average share price that year, (E): based on a share price of US$0.52 on 15 Mar 2007 17:33 HKT
Cheryl Lee, CFA
Analyst
cheryl.lee@ubs.com
+65-6836 5914
Michael Lim
Associate Analyst
michael-h.lim@ubs.com
+65-6836 5902
16 March 2007
Trading data
52-wk. range US$0.60-0.51
US$0.60-0.51Market cap. US$0.67bn
US$0.67bnShares o/s 1,293m
1,293mFree float 17%
17%Avg. daily volume ('000) 186
186Avg. daily value (US$m) 0.1
0.1Balance sheet data 12/07E
Shareholders' equity US$0.30bn
US$0.30bnP/BV (UBS) 2.2x
2.2xNet cash (debt) (US$0.36bn)
(US$0.36bn)Forecast returns
Forecast price appreciation +82.7%
+82.7%Forecast dividend yield 2.5%
2.5%Forecast stock return +85.2%
+85.2%Market return assumption 5.0%
5.0%Forecast excess return +80.2%
+80.2%EPS (UBS, US$)
12/07E 12/06
From To Cons. Actual
H1E - 0.03 - 0.02
- 0.03 - 0.02H2E - 0.03 - 0.03
- 0.03 - 0.0312/07E - 0.06 -
- 0.06 -12/08E - 0.07 -
- 0.07 -Performance (US$)
0
0 . 1
0 . 2
0 . 3
0 . 4
0 . 5
0 . 6
0 . 7
12/03
03/04
06/04
09/04
12/04
03/05
06/05
09/05
12/05
03/06
06/06
09/06
12/06
03/07
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 00
1 20
Pric e T arg e t (U S$) (LHS ) R el. Singapore All S h a re (R HS )
Stoc k P ric e (U S $) (LHS )
Sto ck P rice (U S $) R el. S in ga p or e A ll Sh a re
Source: UBS
www.ubs.com/investmentresearch
This report has been prepared by UBS
Securities Pte. Ltd.
Chemoil Energy Limited 16 March 2007
UBS 2
UBS 2
2This is an extract from our initiation of coverage report published on 16
March 2007. For more detail, please refer to the longer report.
Summary and Investment Case
Track record. Chemoil is one of the largest independent providers of marine
fuel products (bunkers) in the world. The company, established 25 years ago by
its CEO Robert Chandran, commands a significant market share in key
bunkering markets.
fuel products (bunkers) in the world. The company, established 25 years ago by
its CEO Robert Chandran, commands a significant market share in key
bunkering markets.
Supportive macro trends. Over the next few years, we expect two key trends
to underpin bunkering industry growth?continuing expansion in global trade
and a large increase in the global fleet size. As oil prices remain high, we could
see further in-market consolidation, benefiting players such as Chemoil.
to underpin bunkering industry growth?continuing expansion in global trade
and a large increase in the global fleet size. As oil prices remain high, we could
see further in-market consolidation, benefiting players such as Chemoil.
Growth drivers. The bunkering business is volume driven, and Chemoil?s key
competitive advantages are its economies of scale, superior sourcing and
distribution networks, and cheap access to credit.
We expect Chemoil?s earnings growth to be driven by: 1) volume growth: from
increasing its market share at existing high-volume ports (Singapore and
Rotterdam) and entering new markets (Fujairah); and 2) margin growth: via
improving inventory sourcing, restructuring costs, and increasing asset turn.
competitive advantages are its economies of scale, superior sourcing and
distribution networks, and cheap access to credit.
We expect Chemoil?s earnings growth to be driven by: 1) volume growth: from
increasing its market share at existing high-volume ports (Singapore and
Rotterdam) and entering new markets (Fujairah); and 2) margin growth: via
improving inventory sourcing, restructuring costs, and increasing asset turn.
Industry dynamics support Chemoil?s strategy. We expect Chemoil to gain
market share from both the large oil majors and the small players.
market share from both the large oil majors and the small players.
(1) Large competitors, such as the oil majors (45% global market share), are
gradually de-emphasising this business in favour of upstream investment.
Upstream investments offer better earnings potential and could yield
superior returns, especially in a higher normalised oil price environment.
Bunkering typically accounts for less than 2% of an oil majors? total
earnings.
gradually de-emphasising this business in favour of upstream investment.
Upstream investments offer better earnings potential and could yield
superior returns, especially in a higher normalised oil price environment.
Bunkering typically accounts for less than 2% of an oil majors? total
earnings.
(2) Small players (30-40% global market share) with fewer vertically
integrated operations and credit facilities, and weaker balance sheets and
scale economies seem to be losing market share to the larger players,
because their suite of services is limited.
integrated operations and credit facilities, and weaker balance sheets and
scale economies seem to be losing market share to the larger players,
because their suite of services is limited.
Network advantage. Chemoil?s size and network are critical, in our view,
allowing it to capitalise on economies of scale, which, we believe, is an
important growth driver. Chemoil has a very strong competitive edge over
smaller players, as its direct reach into key customers (as opposed to through a
middle-man as with the case for many of its competitors) means it can offer
better services and superior credit terms.
allowing it to capitalise on economies of scale, which, we believe, is an
important growth driver. Chemoil has a very strong competitive edge over
smaller players, as its direct reach into key customers (as opposed to through a
middle-man as with the case for many of its competitors) means it can offer
better services and superior credit terms.
Access to credit. The use of financial resources is a key bargaining tool to win
market share in the industry. Crucially, Chemoil?s financial strength means it is
in a position to offer important customers financing terms smaller players would
be unable to match. Gearing appears to be high (2007E net debt/equity of about
market share in the industry. Crucially, Chemoil?s financial strength means it is
in a position to offer important customers financing terms smaller players would
be unable to match. Gearing appears to be high (2007E net debt/equity of about
Significant market share in key
bunkering markets
Expansion in global trade and a sharp
increase in global fleet size are the key
positives
We expect earnings to be driven by
Chemoil?s continuing ability to raise
market share in existing ports, enter
new markets and, in the process,
maximise asset turn
Oil majors are de-emphasising this
business in favour of upstream
investments
Small players with weak balance sheets
are being squeezed out
We think Chemoil?s size and network
are critical
Access to credit, a key competitive
advantage
Chemoil Energy Limited 16 March 2007
UBS 3
UBS 3
3120%), but one should bear in mind that its inventory is readily convertible into
cash; hence this should not be a cause for concern, in our view.
Business strategy. Management plans to expand its network; rationalise costs by
acquiring distribution infrastructure (oil storage tanks, oil tankers, and bunker
barges) where ownership and control are deemed critical to improve market share
and asset turn. Management believes sustainable margin improvement?and
therefore lower per unit costs?could be achieved if the company owns and
controls certain assets instead of leasing them from third parties.
acquiring distribution infrastructure (oil storage tanks, oil tankers, and bunker
barges) where ownership and control are deemed critical to improve market share
and asset turn. Management believes sustainable margin improvement?and
therefore lower per unit costs?could be achieved if the company owns and
controls certain assets instead of leasing them from third parties.
Valuation. We value Chemoil at US$0.95 based on the discounted value of its
free cash flow to equity, using a 9.2% COE discount rate and assuming 3%
terminal growth. We forecast net profit growth of 33% for 2007 and about 20%
YoY growth until 2010. This assumes that the company would be able to
achieve volume growth of 10-15% from 2007-10?equivalent to a net addition
of about 1.5-2.5m metric tonnes (MT) of bunkers annually. We also assume
there would be steady margin improvement from economies of scale and cost
synergies.
The stock seems inexpensive at current levels,?on a historical 2006 PE of
10.7x and at only 8.7x 2007 estimated earnings. We believe if management is
able to implement its strategy of delivering healthy volume growth and
sustained margin improvement over the next few reporting periods, Chemoil
would benefit from a significant re-rating.
At our price target, Chemoil would trade at 16.0x 2007 estimated net profit and
13.3x 2007 projected EV/EBITDA. We think this is still attractive versus other
logistics stocks. Chemoil does not have any Singapore-listed direct comparable;
however, Olam International is similar in terms of business model. Outside
Singapore other listed bunker suppliers include World Fuel Services and Aegean
Marine that are trading at 10-12x 2007 EV/EBITDA, based on Bloomberg
consensus estimates.
free cash flow to equity, using a 9.2% COE discount rate and assuming 3%
terminal growth. We forecast net profit growth of 33% for 2007 and about 20%
YoY growth until 2010. This assumes that the company would be able to
achieve volume growth of 10-15% from 2007-10?equivalent to a net addition
of about 1.5-2.5m metric tonnes (MT) of bunkers annually. We also assume
there would be steady margin improvement from economies of scale and cost
synergies.
The stock seems inexpensive at current levels,?on a historical 2006 PE of
10.7x and at only 8.7x 2007 estimated earnings. We believe if management is
able to implement its strategy of delivering healthy volume growth and
sustained margin improvement over the next few reporting periods, Chemoil
would benefit from a significant re-rating.
At our price target, Chemoil would trade at 16.0x 2007 estimated net profit and
13.3x 2007 projected EV/EBITDA. We think this is still attractive versus other
logistics stocks. Chemoil does not have any Singapore-listed direct comparable;
however, Olam International is similar in terms of business model. Outside
Singapore other listed bunker suppliers include World Fuel Services and Aegean
Marine that are trading at 10-12x 2007 EV/EBITDA, based on Bloomberg
consensus estimates.