Home
Login Register
Baker Technology    Last:0.55    +0.01

It's time to rebound ????

 Post Reply 501-520 of 690
 
wishbone
    25-Apr-2010 18:12  
Contact    Quote!


Will see how BT and YZJ perform tomorrow !! 

Is SELL ON NEWS in the making????? 
 
 
iwonder
    25-Apr-2010 17:23  
Contact    Quote!

Buy on rumours and sell on news seems to be the case......so after the sales Baker Tech

will loose its recurring income from PPL



hotstock1      ( Date: 24-Apr-2010 14:40) Posted:

Be careful after baker sell PPL stake it has nothing to attract investor. Its existing business is falling.... Good to sell Baker at the high when bidding is irrational.... For short term place only.

 
 
shplayer
    25-Apr-2010 16:41  
Contact    Quote!


Additional info for SJ forumers.

PPL is the former Promet Shipyard......one of the prominent rig bulders in the 80s and run by Brian Chang. They built mostly Baker Marine (now Baker Tech) designed rigs.

During the oil slump from the mid 80s to recent (2003?), Brian Chang quit Promet and transferred his shares (whether sold, gave....I don't know the details) to his brother Benety Chang. Brian went on to set up Yantai Shipyard in China and believe is now listed in Norway.

Benety then acquired the design rights to Baker offshore rigs (the BMC Class) and rig equipment and restructured the company by injecting it and PPL and Baker into the axle company which he earlier took control.

When the rig market began to pick up in the early 2000s, PPL had problems to secure major jobs cos they lacked the ability to finance the projects. Also, the lease of their seafront land with our Govt JTC was soon expiring.

That is where SCM(with lots of $$$ and Govt connection) jumped in and took advantage of the situation and acquired 85% of PPL

Since the acquisition of PPL, SCM was quite content to allow PPL to operate independently....key positions being run by Benety, ex Promet andBaker Marine people........to this date.

I am sure, as 85% stake holders of PPL, if YZJ succeeds to take over the 15% of PPL, SCM will move their people in to PPL to take charge and prevent any leak in rig design and construction know how to YZJ.

Perhaps at the time of offer, YZJ was not aware of the situation and they thought they can breeze through with their $$$.

So, I think the story has some more chapters to run.

Caveat emptor.

 

 

 

 
 

 
ruanlai
    24-Apr-2010 14:46  
Contact    Quote!


Monday Morning Short at the high follow by the high of DOW....

Then direction will go all the way to south as things not confirm yet as someone is not accepting.

Short it and huat lar....
 
 
hotstock1
    24-Apr-2010 14:40  
Contact    Quote!
Be careful after baker sell PPL stake it has nothing to attract investor. Its existing business is falling.... Good to sell Baker at the high when bidding is irrational.... For short term place only.
 
 
pharoah88
    24-Apr-2010 14:29  
Contact    Quote!
Baker Tech accepts Yangzijiang's offer to buy PPLH

By NISHA RAMCHANDANI


BAKER Technology has accepted an offer from shipbuilder Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) to buy PPL Holdings (PPLH) from Baker for US$155 million.


Baker, which received a letter of offer from Yangzijiang on April 16 to buy all of PPLH, said that accepting the offer allowed the company to unlock the value of its investment in PPLH. PPLH is an investment holding company that holds a 15 per cent stake in PPL Shipyard, which constructs offshore drilling rigs.

Baker also said it had received a letter from Sembcorp Marine on April 22 through its lawyers 'demanding that (Baker) not accept the offer' as Sembcorp Marine alleged that any sale to Yangzijiang would circumvent Sembcorp Marine's pre-emptive rights to have first right of refusal over the sale of PPLH's shareholdings in PPL Shipyard. Sembcorp Marine has an 85 per cent stake in PPL Shipyard.

'The board has sought and received legal advice that Sembcorp Marine has no basis for its claims,' Baker said in an announcement on the Singapore Exchange yesterday evening.

Yangzijiang, which is based in China, is making the purchase together with a Middle East investor, the shipbuilder said last week.

If the acquisition goes through, Yangzijiang, the Middle Eastern investor and Mediterranean Success Group - which is wholly owned by Yangzijiang's non-executive director Yu Kebing - will hold stakes of 50.1 per cent, 45 per cent and 4.9 per cent respectively in PPLH.

As part of the deal, Yangzijiang will place 83.55 million new shares to the Middle Eastern investor at $1.295 a share. The proceeds will be used for the acquisition.
 

 
pharoah88
    24-Apr-2010 12:31  
Contact    Quote!

  WOW       WOW        WOW 

Baker Tech ACCEPTS Offer

SINGAPORE

In a filing on Friday, Baker said that it has received a binding letter of offer from Yangzijiang to buy the entire and paid up share capital of PPLH for US$155 million ($208 million).

Payment for the acquisition will be made in cash after the completion of the sale and purchase of the Sale Shares, the announcement said.

One condition of the agreement is an escrow agreement that requires the purchaser to deposit the Total Sum with an escrow agent.

*EXTREMELY  SMART  GOVERNANCE*

The sale of the shares is still subject to the approval of shareholders at an extraordinary general meeting to be convened.— Mainboardlisted Baker Technology said it has accepted Yangzijiang Shipbuilding’s offer to purchase Singapore- based PPL Holdings.

Millet Enriquez

 
 
shplayer
    24-Apr-2010 12:27  
Contact    Quote!


boliaguy,

You are absolutely right.....the YZJ offer is extremely attractive.....but this is not the issue.

The issue is with SCM. As 85% shareholder of PPL, they can complicate the deal and drag it on.

By allowing YZJ put a foothold into the rig market door, it may introduce another competitor (currently Keppel is world #1 and SCM with PPL is #2).....and a China one at that....with low cost manufacturing. I think SCM will try their best to defend this position.

Caveat emptor.

 
 
 
boliaoguy
    24-Apr-2010 11:50  
Contact    Quote!

Without prejudice, I see no reason why BT should turn down the offer by YZJ. The offer is just too good. YZJ is probably one of the top 3 wealthiest (if not the wealthiest) shipbuilders in the region and they could splash a lot of vitamin M in to expand PPL. I remember the times when the economic is doing badly, profits of YZJ is still pouring in like waterfall. I dont think it’s wise for SCM to counter offer as the amount offered by YZJ is out of this world. Unless, TH(temasek) want to step in to help a bit. But this will affect their other investments and they will have to answer to the shareholders. Even if SCM do counter offer, don’t forget YZJ is capable of counter offering back with another better offer.

Looking at Part A section 8 - Interests of Directors and Controlling Shareholders, of the announcement release by BT, the only director that has got shares of YZJ is Tan Yan Guan who is holding 50,000 shares. 50 000 shares at current market price is not worth a lot. Furthermore, none of the Directors or controlling shareholders of the Company has any interest, direct or indirect, in the Proposed Disposal. Hence, I don’t think the acceptance of offer by BT is of personal interest/profits/gains within the directors board. Otherwise, every director will be holding on to tons of YZJ shares now. The acceptance is of best interest of the shareholders of BT.

It just doesn’t make sense for SCM to disagree with the deal, after all, if YZJ help PPL to expand and increase profits, SCM will benefits as well. The disagreement is perhaps personal? Not wanting competition from others? Remember the time when there’s only 1 telco in Singapore?

Just my personal view, I may be wrong. Lol~ let’s wait and see!

 
 
limkt009
    24-Apr-2010 11:26  
Contact    Quote!
Shorts ready.
 

 
boliaoguy
    24-Apr-2010 11:11  
Contact    Quote!
wonder when will they lift the halt?
 
 
DnApeh
    24-Apr-2010 10:52  
Contact    Quote!

Thank you very much.

Maybe SCM is not happy because YZJ did not offer to buy their share....just kidding.



shplayer      ( Date: 24-Apr-2010 10:07) Posted:

What you and I know is public info and as yet, as far as I know, there is no announcement of a counter bid.

But here are the facts:

YZJ offer of USD 155m for 15% stake in PPL values PPL at USD1033m (S$1415m).

In 2001, SCM paid $16m for 50% of PPL

In 2003, SCM paid S$14.7m for another 35% of PPL.

Total for 85% of PPL is S$30.7m

Clearly, SCM has an advantage if they average their cost of acquisition. But, from my opinion, SCM has no grounds to object to the PPL/YZJ deal unless they are prepared to match or better YZJ offer.

Now, the question is, are they willing to match or go into a bidding war with YZJ for the balance 15%.

Another issue is, as 15% stake holder of PPL, how much control can they secure to get a foothold into the offshore rig technology and market (I presume this is their objective in paying such high premium for PPL.

Now, the question is, are they willing to match or go into a bidding war with YZJ for the balance 15%.....which is very expensive.

Story is still unfolding.

Caveat emptor

 



DnApeh      ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 22:17) Posted:

Do we have a higher offer


 
 
shplayer
    24-Apr-2010 10:07  
Contact    Quote!

What you and I know is public info and as yet, as far as I know, there is no announcement of a counter bid.

But here are the facts:

YZJ offer of USD 155m for 15% stake in PPL values PPL at USD1033m (S$1415m).

In 2001, SCM paid $16m for 50% of PPL

In 2003, SCM paid S$14.7m for another 35% of PPL.

Total for 85% of PPL is S$30.7m

Clearly, SCM has an advantage if they average their cost of acquisition. But, from my opinion, SCM has no grounds to object to the PPL/YZJ deal unless they are prepared to match or better YZJ offer.

Now, the question is, are they willing to match or go into a bidding war with YZJ for the balance 15%.

Another issue is, as 15% stake holder of PPL, how much control can they secure to get a foothold into the offshore rig technology and market (I presume this is their objective in paying such high premium for PPL.

Now, the question is, are they willing to match or go into a bidding war with YZJ for the balance 15%.....which is very expensive.

Story is still unfolding.

Caveat emptor

 



DnApeh      ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 22:17) Posted:

Do we have a higher offer?

shplayer      ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 21:31) Posted:



Yep, annoumcement just released.

http://info.sgx.com/webcoranncatth.nsf/VwAttachments/Att_9C327E0AEF06A9B34825770E00465681/$file/AnnDisposalofPPLH.pdf?openelement

See last para. SCM objecting to the sale. This may complicate things.


 
 
DnApeh
    23-Apr-2010 22:17  
Contact    Quote!
Do we have a higher offer?

shplayer      ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 21:31) Posted:



Yep, annoumcement just released.

http://info.sgx.com/webcoranncatth.nsf/VwAttachments/Att_9C327E0AEF06A9B34825770E00465681/$file/AnnDisposalofPPLH.pdf?openelement

See last para. SCM objecting to the sale. This may complicate things.

 
 
shplayer
    23-Apr-2010 21:31  
Contact    Quote!


Yep, annoumcement just released.

http://info.sgx.com/webcoranncatth.nsf/VwAttachments/Att_9C327E0AEF06A9B34825770E00465681/$file/AnnDisposalofPPLH.pdf?openelement

See last para. SCM objecting to the sale. This may complicate things.
 

 
shplayer
    23-Apr-2010 21:13  
Contact    Quote!


If the HALT is merely due to the board supporting the sale of 15% PPL to YZJ, it should be a simple and straight forward matter and announcement should not take agonisingly long to be uploaded.

What I think is happening may be more complex.

In most shareholder's agreement, there usually is a clause that the 'seller'(BT) will have to give the existing shareholders (in this case SCM) a 'Right of First Refusal' to buy the seller's shares. This is usually on the condition that the existing shareholder (SCM) is prepared to meet the price.

If this is so, I don't think BT will lose out.....but perhaps the hype at YZJ will quickly fizzle out.......unless they are prepared to up their bid to an extent that SCM backs off.
 
 
pharoah88
    23-Apr-2010 17:17  
Contact    Quote!


Friday: 23 APRIL 2010

HALTED  ONE  FULL DAY
 
 
pharoah88
    23-Apr-2010 15:56  
Contact    Quote!

nOtice of AGM  AGENDA at BAKER TECH  IR webside cannot be open.

May be they have placed RESTRICTION on this document during the suspension so that nobody can read it.



Fishcake      ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 15:48) Posted:

was the YZJ offer included in the AGM?

pharoah88      ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 14:26) Posted:

BAKER TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

(Unique Entity Number 198100637D)

(Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore)

RESOLUTIONS PASSED AT ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD ON 22 APRIL 2010

Pursuant to Rule 704(14) of the SGX Securities Trading Listing Manual, the Board of Directors of Baker Technology Limited ("the Company") wishes to inform that at the Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) of the Company held today, all resolutions relating to the matters as set out in the Notice of AGM dated 29 March 2010 were duly approved and passed by the shareholders of the Company.

By Order of the Board

Aw Seok Chin

Company Secretary

22 April 2010



 
 
Fishcake
    23-Apr-2010 15:48  
Contact    Quote!
was the YZJ offer included in the AGM?

pharoah88      ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 14:26) Posted:

BAKER TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

(Unique Entity Number 198100637D)

(Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore)

RESOLUTIONS PASSED AT ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD ON 22 APRIL 2010

Pursuant to Rule 704(14) of the SGX Securities Trading Listing Manual, the Board of Directors of Baker Technology Limited ("the Company") wishes to inform that at the Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) of the Company held today, all resolutions relating to the matters as set out in the Notice of AGM dated 29 March 2010 were duly approved and passed by the shareholders of the Company.

By Order of the Board

Aw Seok Chin

Company Secretary

22 April 2010


 
 
pharoah88
    23-Apr-2010 14:33  
Contact    Quote!

BAKER TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

(Company Registration No. 198100637D)

(Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore)

OFFER FROM YANGZIJIANG SHIPBUILDING (HOLDINGS) LTD. TO PURCHASE

THE ENTIRE ISSUED AND PAID-UP SHARE CAPITAL OF PPL HOLDINGS PTE LTD

1. Introduction

The Board of Directors of Baker Technology Limited (the “

announce that it had on 16 April 2010, received,

16 April 2010 pursuant to which the Purchaser has made an offer (the “

purchase from the Company all the issued and paid-up shares in the capital of PPL

Holdings Pte Ltd (“

The Purchaser is a public company with its issued ordinary shares listed and quoted on

the Mainboard of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (the “

PPLH, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is a private limited company

incorporated in the Republic of Singapore. It is an investment holding company and it

holds an aggregate direct and indirect 15% shareholding stake in PPL Shipyard Pte Ltd

(“

construction of offshore drilling rigs from shallow water to deep water.Company”) wishes tointer alia, a binding letter of offer (theLetter of Offer”) from Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) Ltd. (the “Purchaser”) datedOffer”) toPPLH”) on the terms and conditions as set out therein.SGX-ST”).PPL Shipyard”). PPL Shipyard is principally engaged in the business of design and

2. Key Terms of the Offer

2.1 Consideration

Pursuant to the Letter of Offer, the Purchaser has made a binding offer to purchase an

aggregate of 20,000,000 issued and paid-up ordinary shares in the capital of PPLH (the

consideration of US$155,000,000 (the “

The Consideration shall be payable to the Company in cash on completion of the sale

and purchase of the Sale Shares (the “

announcement.Sale Shares”), representing the entire issued and paid-up share capital of PPLH, for aConsideration”).Completion”), subject to Section 2.6 of this

2.2 Rights attached to the Sale Shares

Subject to the Company accepting the Offer and to the terms and conditions contained in

the Letter of Offer, the Purchaser shall purchase from the Company and the Company

shall sell to the Purchaser all and not part only of the Sale Shares free from all claims,

liens, restrictions, charges, pledges, mortgages, trusts, equities and other encumbrances,

and with all rights as of 16 April 2010 or thereafter attaching thereto at the Consideration

save and except for a dividend of S$4,690,000 to be declared and paid by PPLH to the

Company prior to Completion, of which S$3,090,000 shall be paid in cash and the

balance S$1,600,000 to be mutually off-set against a sum of S$1,600,000 owing by the

Company to PPLH.

2.3 Condition Precedent

The obligations of the parties to complete the sale and purchase of the Sale Shares shall

be subject to approval being obtained from the shareholders of the Company to sell the

Sale Shares, such approval to be obtained at an extraordinary general meeting of the

Company (the “

If the above condition precedent is not fulfilled by 27 October 2010 or such further date

as the parties may agree in writing (the “

facto

for costs, damages, compensation or anything whatsoever, save as provided under

Section 2.6 of this announcement.EGM”) to be convened.Long Stop Date”), the agreement shall, ipso, cease and determine and neither party shall have any claim against the other party

2.4 Deadline for Acceptance of the Offer

The Company has up to 4.00 p.m. on 4 May 2010 to accept the Offer in accordance with

the terms and conditions of the Letter of Offer, failing which the Offer shall lapse and shall

not be capable of being accepted.

2.5 Acceptance of the Offer by the Company

To accept the Offer pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Letter of Offer, the

Company must sign on the Form of Acceptance of Offer as set out in the Letter of Offer

and,

(a) the escrow agreement dated 15 April 2010 duly signed by the Purchaser, Fortus

Ltd, Mediterranean Success Group Inc. and Julius Baer Family Office & Trust Ltd

(the “

Agreement

(b) a letter of undertaking by Saberon Investments Pte Ltd, the controlling

shareholder of the Company, undertaking to the Purchaser that it will vote its

shares in the Company in favour of the ordinary resolution at the EGM to be

convened to approve the sale by the Company of the Sale Shares to the

Purchaser; and

(c) a letter of undertaking from each of Messrs Benety Chang and Anthony

Sabastian Aurol, each a director of the Company, undertaking to the Purchaser

that he will not voluntarily tender his resignation as executive director of PPL

Shipyard during the period of two (2) years commencing from 1 January 2011,

unless instructed in writing to do so by the Purchaser.inter alia, arrange for the execution of the following documents:Escrow Agent”) and to be signed by the Company (the “Escrow”);

2.6 Key Terms of the Escrow Agreement

Pursuant to the Escrow Agreement, the Purchaser shall:

(a) pending acceptance of the Offer and Completion, deposit with the Escrow Agent

the sum of US$15,500,000 (being equal to 10% of the Consideration) as earnest

money to be held in escrow by the Escrow Agent pursuant to the Escrow

Agreement; and

(b) by a date falling not later than 26 April 2010, deposit the sum of US$155,000,000

(being 100% of the Consideration) with the Escrow Agent in place of the said

sum of US$15,500,000,

and if the Purchaser fails to make the deposits as stated in (b) above, the Purchaser shall

pay to the Company, if the Escrow Agent has failed to do so pursuant to the terms and

conditions set out in the Escrow Agreement, the earnest money of US$15,500,000

forthwith upon the acceptance of the Offer as advance payment of the Consideration.

The remaining balance of the Consideration of US$139,500,000 will be paid by the

Purchaser to the Company on Completion.

If the condition precedent is not fulfilled by the Long Stop Date, all monies held by the

Escrow Agent or paid to the Company pursuant to the above paragraph shall be returned

by the Escrow Agent to the Purchaser or otherwise dealt with in accordance with the

Escrow Agreement.

3. Decision by the Company in relation to the Offer

The Company is considering the Offer as set out in the Letter of Offer. The Company will

make further announcements to update shareholders on the Offer as and when

appropriate.

4. Interest of Directors and Controlling Shareholders

Our Director, Mr Tan Yang Guan holds 50,000 shares in the capital of the Purchaser as

at the date hereof.

Save as disclosed in this announcement, none of the Directors or controlling

shareholders of the Company has any interest, direct or indirect, in the Offer (other than

through their shareholding interests in the Company).

5. Documents for Inspection

A copy of the Letter of Offer and the Escrow Agreement may be inspected at 36

Robinson Road, 18

for a period of three months from the date of this announcement.th Floor, City House, Singapore 068877 during normal business hours

6. Trading Caution

The Board would like to caution that there is no assurance that any transaction will

materialise in relation to the Offer.

therefore advised to exercise caution in their dealings in the Company’s shares

and warrants and to seek their own financial and legal advice where appropriate

By Order of the Board

Baker Technology Limited

Aw Seok Chin

Company Secretary

17 April 2010
Shareholders, warrantholders and investors are.

 
Important: Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy .