Post Reply
341-360 of 741
Trade summary: closed unchanged 0.014. Vol-139,990,000 million shr changed hands.
| MDR | CPF | CD | Op-0.015 | Cls-0.014 |
| (Bid-vol)207,435,000 | 0.014 | 0.015 | (Ask-vol)79,103,000 |
| Last | Trades | Volume | Bid Volume | Mid | Ask Volume |
| 0.014 | 20 | 5,652,000 | 5,652,000 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.015 | 179 | 131,650,000 | 70,075,000 | 0 | 61,575,000 |
| 0.016 | 9 | 2,696,000 | 0 | 0 | 2,696,000 |
| TOTAL | 208 | 139,998,000 | 75,727,000 | 0 | 64,271,000 |
very curious about how this stock moves. there's always millions and millions queuing to buy and sell, but transactions by comparison are limited.
like for today, there's twice the buyers compared to sellers. obviously they cannot get their price, esp since sellers have upper hand. but they refused to budge from their offer price. and based on previous patterns, sellers will not budge as well.
it's like both sides are for show only. like road blocks.
is there a big hidden hand manipulating? if so, for what purpose?
this stock is very strange to me.
any experienced traders here know what's going on?
Thanks for the sharing. Smart guy. Note that 77.28% of the warrants are being held by the top warrant holders --> less warrants on market for trading. Anomaly here - price of warrant should trade at a premium, so there's good potential for capital gains. DYODD.
gufeng ( Date: 12-Apr-2012 22:39) Posted:
|
With the NK satellite launch behind us, this babe will be successfully propelled into the outer space, not like the NK one. Lol. Huat-ah!
trade summary: MDR, closed @0.014 (unchanged) Vs W140925, closed @0.009 cts, (unchanged)
| Last | Trades | Volume | Bid Volume | Mid | Ask Volume |
| 0.014 | 31 | 6,607,000 | 6,607,000 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.015 | 87 | 40,542,000 | 1,494,000 | 0 | 39,048,000 |
| TOTAL | 118 | 47,149,000 | 8,101,000 | 0 | 39,048,000 |
| Last | Trades | Volume | Bid Volume | Mid | Ask Volume |
| 0.009 | 29 | 30,028,000 | 8,839,000 | 0 | 21,189,000 |
| TOTAL | 29 | 30,028,000 | 8,839,000 | 0 | 21,189,000 |
Dear Mdr Supporters,
Mdr 2011 annual report is available online now. http://www.m-dr.com/doc/AR2011.pdf
Interesting findings.
Check out this guy Edward Lee Ewe Ming who holds more then 1.6 billion Mdr warrant (26.97%). In charge of hedge fund and expert in mergers and aquisition.
| MDR | CPF | CD | Op-0.014 | Cls-0.014-unchanged | Vol-284,380,000 | 202,324,000 | 0.014 | 0.015 | 38,562,000 | HI-0.016 | Lo-0.014 |
| MDR W140925 | Op-0.008 | Cls-0.009 | +0.001 | +12.5 | Vol-176,607,000 | 2,450,000 | 0.009 | 0.010 | 98,746,000 | Hi-0.010 | Lo-0.008 |
MDR (mother) shr
| Last | Trades | Volume | Bid Volume | Mid | Ask Volume |
| 0.013 | 1 | 294,000 | 294,000 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.014 | 175 | 99,138,000 | 49,148,000 | 0 | 49,990,000 |
| 0.015 | 3 | 2,100,000 | 0 | 0 | 2,100,000 |
| TOTAL | 179 | 101,532,000 | 49,442,000 | 0 | 52,090,000 |
MDR W140925 warrant
| Last | Trades | Volume | Bid Volume | Mid | Ask Volume |
| 0.008 | 30 | 38,754,000 | 29,216,000 | 0 | 9,538,000 |
| TOTAL | 30 | 38,754,000 | 29,216,000 | 0 | 9,538,000 |
 Issue_and_Allotment_of_Shares_Warrants_10April.pdf |
ISSUE AND ALLOTMENT OF SHARES PURSUANT TO EXERCISE OF WARRANTS
Board of Directors of mDR Limited (the “Company”) wishes to announce that the issued share capital of the Company has increased from 6,638,460,318 ordinary shares to 6,734,423,062 ordinary shares by way of allotment and issuance of 95,962,744 new ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise of 95,962,744 Warrants (W140925) at the exercise price of S$0.005 for each new ordinary share on 10 April 2012. These new ordinary shares rank pari passu in all respects with the existing issued ordinary shares in the capital of the Company, and are expected to be listed and quoted on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited with effect from 12 April 2012.
Trade summary: Weak trading seen at 0.015 cts on last Thurs, hope for better tomorro...Happi Trading.
| Last | Trades | Volume | Bid Volume | Mid | Ask Volume |
| 0.014 | 116 | 57,075,000 | 6,479,000 | 0 | 50,596,000 |
| 0.015 | 14 | 10,601,000 | 0 | 0 | 10,601,000 |
| TOTAL | 130 | 67,676,000 | 6,479,000 | 0 | 61,197,000 |
teeth53 ( Date: 03-Apr-2012 20:08) Posted:
|
An attempted by W140925 shr to stay in touch with it mother shr.
| Time | Last | Volume | Bid/Ask |
| 17:04:20 | 0.009 | 1,000 | A |
| 11:17:22 | 0.008 | 80,000 | B |
| 10:42:25 | 0.008 | 200,000 | A |
| 10:42:25 | 0.008 | 1,000,000 | A |
| 10:42:25 | 0.008 | 232,000 | A |
| 10:42:22 | 0.008 | 1,000,000 | A |
| 10:42:18 | 0.008 | 332,000 | A |
| 10:42:18 | 0.008 | 200,000 | A |
| 10:42:18 | 0.008 | 700,000 | A |
| 10:42:18 | 0.008 | 768,000 | A |
| 10:42:10 | 0.008 | 1,000,000 | A |
Last done at....
| Time | Last | Volume | Bid/Ask |
| 17:04:21 | 0.015 | 698,000 | A |
| 17:04:21 | 0.015 | 100,000 | A |
| 17:04:21 | 0.015 | 200,000 | A |
| 17:04:21 | 0.015 | 1,000,000 | A |
| 17:04:21 | 0.015 | 500,000 | A |
| 16:58:01 | 0.014 | 200,000 | B |
| 16:48:04 | 0.015 | 1,000,000 | A |
| 16:41:34 | 0.014 | 2,000 | B |
| 16:03:22 | 0.014 | 150,000 | B |
| 15:51:34 | 0.014 | 200,000 | B |
| 15:08:57 | 0.014 | 300,000 | B |
| 15:08:23 | 0.014 | 21,000 | B |
| 15:08:23 | 0.014 | 79,000 | B |
| 15:05:36 | 0.014 | 100,000 | B |
| 14:44:40 | 0.014 | 628,000 | B |
| 14:44:40 | 0.014 | 1,000 | B |
| 14:44:40 | 0.014 | 171,000 | B |
| 13:47:05 | 0.015 | 3,503,000 | A |
Fully agreed with U.
Bopanha ( Date: 05-Apr-2012 15:12) Posted:
|
Proper thinking should prevail and not rhetorical. No director in his right mind will recommend a consolidation unless he has a hidden agenda.
We know any reason given for a consolidation will work against the interests of all shareholders, including the director's own stake. He will ultimately lose heavily, so he needs to have another way of making back these losses by the back door, which is or will be undoubtedly unethically biased. He will give plenty of reasons or no reason, but you as a shareholder vote against the idea. The equarion is always the same, 10 shares or 100 shares into 1 share, no difference to share profits (don't be fooled by EPS issue, there is no difference in eps for your holding be it 1 share post or 10 shares pre consolidation, in a 10:1 factor) who cares if one share earns 10 cents (post) OR 10 shares each earns 1 cent (pre) but safer for you. (LPPL). Company Profits although dynamic is a non variable factor with shareholders' percentage holdings when processed for dividends, etc. (LPPL) So foolish if you choose to go for consolidation.
Best Buy Mobile
The company will expand its Best Buy Mobile stores to as many as 800 outlets by its fiscal 2016 from 305 now as part of Dunn’s plan to generate revenue from warranties, accessories and connections between phones, tablets and other electronics.
The speed at which Best Buy can adjust its retail model amid “the changing dynamics of the consumer-electronics industry” will influence S& P’s assessment, Ross said.
Any shares consolidation must be done only when there is very big and good news announced together to support the price !
moneycow ( Date: 05-Apr-2012 18:45) Posted:
|
Its about sustainability. Business model and type needs to be considered. If its a lousy business and go and consolidate. It cannot command a high price due to its type of business and earnings. if it price itself too high. It will sure to fall to a level that holders felt its worth. Its like wearing a BIG BIG hat when its head is so tiny. :)
I agree with you, most if not all companies after consolidation fall alot and almost close to pre-consolidate price. One example is Jasper - Its really about Small head wear big hat. . When the BIG hat was put on, it already slipped and cover its face. So blinded and tripped. Fall down the stairs. :)
haha :)
Overall agree with your frustration. BUT one fact remain is. and its a fact. They all have super huge float therefore have no other choice but to consolidate. Its not that they want to or the management felt it should. Its really have NO CHOICE. Or at least the management cannot come out with other alternative..
If you look at share consolidation companies, many of their shares have fallen far far below the pre consol level. can cite a few example, abterra, chinaSing Inv, and many others. I like to think of them behind the fall after consolidation and I really amazed that these directors do not value their own credibility to do consolidation. Abterra has done 25 to 1 when the share was 5 cents meaning post share value is $1.25, and ChinaSing was 1.5 cents pre consolidation of 10 to 1, which mean post consolidation price value is 15 cents. Look at these two simple examples, though I can name more. Abterra is now traded at 60 cents thus each share lose you 75 cents. ChinaSing last traded 3 cents meaning that each share post consolidated lost for you 12 cents per share. Shareholders should not relent to this gimmick of greedy or unthinking directors by agreeing to vote for consolidation. Wake up everyone.
teeth53 ( Date: 05-Apr-2012 13:30) Posted:
|
I think giving warrants is accompanied by right issue, correct? This sort of thing is also a gamble by the company. They are already giving dividends. Now the problem is not dividend payouts but it is how to get good market price for the shares due to the large float. The higer the market price will translate to the higher the capitalization of the company. Capitalization has not much meaning unless backed by real assets.
jovenus ( Date: 05-Apr-2012 14:32) Posted:
|
Give free warrant and then buy back at 1 cent ? Good utilization of cash flow ? Might as well give dividen .
What so special for this " treasury" compared to " ordinary" share ?
Bopanha ( Date: 05-Apr-2012 14:19) Posted:
|
The only way is to buy back the warrants from the market at 1 cent or the market price and this can be done by the " funding investor" . Any warrant holder who sends in to exchange for shares paying the half cent would be given a " treasury" share from a pool that must be created immediately upon an investor agreeing to finance
jovenus ( Date: 05-Apr-2012 14:10) Posted:
|