Post Reply
21-40 of 130
Beruangface, I feel like I'm being questioned like a criminal so forgive me if I keep my stock picks to myself :). Cheers.
beruangface ( Date: 07-May-2010 00:49) Posted:
so mr fundamental, what stocks r u holding now? what stocks r u gg to buy? and lastly when is the right time to buy again?
blackstreams ( Date: 07-May-2010 00:39) Posted:
| Haha, I know of some friends who say exactly the same thing. They're buying because of quick profit and suddenly they become LT investors and they believe in the company fundamentals because the price has dropped beyond cut loss limits. They give fundamental investors like me a bad name :).
|
|
|
|
so mr fundamental, what stocks r u holding now? what stocks r u gg to buy? and lastly when is the right time to buy again?
blackstreams ( Date: 07-May-2010 00:39) Posted:
Haha, I know of some friends who say exactly the same thing. They're buying because of quick profit and suddenly they become LT investors and they believe in the company fundamentals because the price has dropped beyond cut loss limits. They give fundamental investors like me a bad name :).
iPunter ( Date: 07-May-2010 00:08) Posted:
I have since the beginning maintained that all investors are punters...
Whether they admit it or not, or insist to prefer to label themselves as investors, they are dealing with the stock market beast, regardless of how 'blue' their stocks are... And to me, dealing with a monster beast IS punting... 
|
|
|
|
Haha, I know of some friends who say exactly the same thing. They're buying because of quick profit and suddenly they become LT investors and they believe in the company fundamentals because the price has dropped beyond cut loss limits. They give fundamental investors like me a bad name :).
iPunter ( Date: 07-May-2010 00:08) Posted:
I have since the beginning maintained that all investors are punters...
Whether they admit it or not, or insist to prefer to label themselves as investors, they are dealing with the stock market beast, regardless of how 'blue' their stocks are... And to me, dealing with a monster beast IS punting...
alexchia01 ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:58) Posted:
It is true that sound fundamental will eventually trigger the public's interest, but sometime this can take a long time. If the public takes 10 years to get interested in the stock, are you going to hold the stock for 10 years? I rather be there when the public beginning to notices the stock rather than holding it for 10 years waiting for someone to notice it.
|
|
|
|
Absolutely!
senecus ( Date: 07-May-2010 00:00) Posted:
If it takes 10 years...this company's has no fundamental at all.
|
|
Exactly!
kellychang ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:47) Posted:
he believes in Long term, FA and reports la....
iPunter ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:39) Posted:
There are good companies...
But there's no such thing as 'good stocks'...
The best stocks are the ones that makes you money, be it S-chips, or bad chips, or whatever...
Stocks and companies are two different things...
|
|
|
|
aiya. when people trapped into their stock.
then they will start to convince themselves they are INVESTOR.
because they bo bian, then have to keep the stock.
this situation, i also faced before.
u must understand our feeling. OK?
iPunter ( Date: 07-May-2010 00:08) Posted:
I have since the beginning maintained that all investors are punters...
Whether they admit it or not, or insist to prefer to label themselves as investors, they are dealing with the stock market beast, regardless of how 'blue' their stocks are... And to me, dealing with a monster beast IS punting...
alexchia01 ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:58) Posted:
It is true that sound fundamental will eventually trigger the public's interest, but sometime this can take a long time. If the public takes 10 years to get interested in the stock, are you going to hold the stock for 10 years? I rather be there when the public beginning to notices the stock rather than holding it for 10 years waiting for someone to notice it.
|
|
|
|
I have since the beginning maintained that all investors are punters...
Whether they admit it or not,
or insist to prefer to label themselves as investors,
they are dealing with the stock market beast, regardless of how 'blue' their stocks are...
And to me, dealing with a monster beast IS punting...
alexchia01 ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:58) Posted:
It is true that sound fundamental will eventually trigger the public's interest, but sometime this can take a long time. If the public takes 10 years to get interested in the stock, are you going to hold the stock for 10 years? I rather be there when the public beginning to notices the stock rather than holding it for 10 years waiting for someone to notice it.
senecus ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:51) Posted:
That is a punter theory....not applicable to a investor.......your definition of a good stock is actually punting stock.
A good stock requires its company's sound fundamental to trigger public's interest and confidence.
|
|
|
|
u so good in sweet talk ya.
make me so happy.
hahahaha....
but i see red, i very happy de.
u know de la. my favor colour is red.
2 months ago till now, never change! hahahaha....
iPunter ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:57) Posted:
Wow... You are advancing so fast... Maybe I soon ! also need to take you as one of my sifu ... hehehe...
kellychang ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:55) Posted:
last time i also believe in Long term, FA and reports. but now, i dun rely on such things so much. now i think TIMING is very important. hehehehehe
|
|
|
|
If it takes 10 years...this company's has no fundamental at all.
It is true that sound fundamental will eventually trigger the public's interest, but sometime this can take a long time.
If the public takes 10 years to get interested in the stock, are you going to hold the stock for 10 years?
I rather be there when the public beginning to notices the stock rather than holding it for 10 years waiting for someone to notice it.
senecus ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:51) Posted:
That is a punter theory....not applicable to a investor.......your definition of a good stock is actually punting stock.
A good stock requires its company's sound fundamental to trigger public's interest and confidence.
|
|
Wow...
You are advancing so fast...
Maybe I soon ! also need to take you as one of my sifu ...
hehehe...
kellychang ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:55) Posted:
last time i also believe in Long term, FA and reports. but now, i dun rely on such things so much. now i think TIMING is very important. hehehehehe
iPunter ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:50) Posted:
To me, one year is like forever... hehehe...
|
|
|
|
last time i also believe in Long term, FA and reports.
but now, i dun rely on such things so much.
now i think TIMING is very important.
hehehehehe
iPunter ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:50) Posted:
To me, one year is like forever... hehehe...
kellychang ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:47) Posted:
| he believes in Long term, FA and reports la....
|
|
|
|
That is a punter theory....not applicable to a investor.......your definition of a good stock is actually punting stock.
A good stock requires its company's sound fundamental to trigger public's interest and confidence.
A stock is consider a "Good Stock" if you can sell the stock at a higher price.
No point buying a good company's stock when on one wants to pay a higher price for it.
To me, one year is like forever...
hehehe...
kellychang ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:47) Posted:
he believes in Long term, FA and reports la....
iPunter ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:39) Posted:
There are good companies...
But there's no such thing as 'good stocks'...
The best stocks are the ones that makes you money, be it S-chips, or bad chips, or whatever...
Stocks and companies are two different things...
|
|
|
|
he believes in Long term, FA and reports la....
iPunter ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:39) Posted:
There are good companies...
But there's no such thing as 'good stocks'...
The best stocks are the ones that makes you money, be it S-chips, or bad chips, or whatever...
Stocks and companies are two different things...
|
|
There are good companies...
But there's no such thing as 'good stocks'...
The best stocks are the ones that makes you money, be it S-chips, or bad chips, or whatever...
Stocks and companies are two different things...
Which is why trust in the company and accountants is so important, as fundamental analysis is so very dependent on honesty. I try not to go into S-Chips unless I'm in a particularly daring mood. :). Cheers.
iPunter ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:23) Posted:
Yes... Owners of the bluest of blue chips can go "pok!" in just two months... And why not? They think in terms of fundamentals, not the beast...
hehehe...
senecus ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:18) Posted:
Just two months......prophecy has changed so much......... |
|
|
|
Some professional traders
do make use of the STI or DOW indices to determine entry or exit points. However, do we retail investors have the funds or the nimbleness to compete with them? My personal feel is if you're into technical analysis, go for individual companies' charts rather than such broad guidelines like the STI or DOW. You might find your gains better having gone in ahead of the BBs. Just my view. Cheers.
kellychang ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:27) Posted:
i paid huge tuition fee in year 2007 . so that is why, when i see people chase stock when STI 3000, i feel they are like my previous me ....
alexchia01 ( Date: 06-May-2010 23:21) Posted:
Yes. Agree with iPunter. Playing stocks is not as simple as it looks. Must pay some "tuition fee" first. |
|
|
|
