Home
Login Register
FSL Trust    Last:0.041    -0.002

FSL Trust - starting to see value in it

 Post Reply 161-180 of 389
 
soloman
    09-Jun-2010 22:12  
Contact    Quote!
THE STOCK PRICE HAS COLLAPSE ..................

soloman      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 22:11) Posted:



IS THIS SHARE IN SING DOLLAR OR US$ ?

 
 
soloman
    09-Jun-2010 22:11  
Contact    Quote!


IS THIS SHARE IN SING DOLLAR OR US$ ?
 
 
178investors
    09-Jun-2010 20:55  
Contact    Quote!
Such risks are inherently present when one do "bareboat" charter. The risk attenuates if it is chartered out to a weak counterparty who likely almost always run into financial trouble in a crisis. FSL is a case in point. That's why i never like FSL even though many stock analysts give buy calls. 

lawcheemeng      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 13:05) Posted:

To be fair to FSL....the bunker charges are owe by the lessee of the ship n not by FSL.......the lessee have also not paid FSL their dues since may this year....so FSL may have to pay all the due charges for the releash of their ships n also end up with redundant ships in hand.....both way also lose lor.......hainz.........not vested

 

 
freeme
    09-Jun-2010 20:29  
Contact    Quote!
its good for the drop.. then we will have more choices when it comes to pick the durian. anything near 34 cts i am willing to load up..
 
 
nickyng
    09-Jun-2010 13:35  
Contact    Quote!
the way i see it......lo$t either way.....good candidate for $HORT$ !! :P

lawcheemeng      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 13:05) Posted:

To be fair to FSL....the bunker charges are owe by the lessee of the ship n not by FSL.......the lessee have also not paid FSL their dues since may this year....so FSL may have to pay all the due charges for the releash of their ships n also end up with redundant ships in hand.....both way also lose lor.......hainz.........not vested

 
 
lawcheemeng
    09-Jun-2010 13:05  
Contact    Quote!
To be fair to FSL....the bunker charges are owe by the lessee of the ship n not by FSL.......the lessee have also not paid FSL their dues since may this year....so FSL may have to pay all the due charges for the releash of their ships n also end up with redundant ships in hand.....both way also lose lor.......hainz.........not vested
 

 
commando
    09-Jun-2010 13:05  
Contact    Quote!
Acutally, who owe the money? FSL or the company that lease ship from them? I believe is the latter right?
 
 
pharoah88
    09-Jun-2010 12:57  
Contact    Quote!
FSL = Fast  Sinking  Lease ? ? ? ?
 
 
holywolf50
    09-Jun-2010 12:52  
Contact    Quote!
hehe outdated or not i dunno la.. but its the latest quarterly report.. 

nickyng      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 12:50) Posted:

report outdated or not?? :P

holywolf50      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 12:47) Posted:

from the report it show that they have 56million cash/short term deposits. and the interest rate is 5-7%


 
 
nickyng
    09-Jun-2010 12:50  
Contact    Quote!
report outdated or not?? :P

holywolf50      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 12:47) Posted:

from the report it show that they have 56million cash/short term deposits. and the interest rate is 5-7%

Jackpot2010      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 12:28) Posted:

O$P$ Today mkt down marginally but this 1 down >11% to 39c (last done) bcos of this. Avoid shipping trust that r heavily indebted. They paid interest >10% on borrowings - how to survive?. Richmers Maritime is another 1 that is sinking. Not vested.



 

 
holywolf50
    09-Jun-2010 12:47  
Contact    Quote!
from the report it show that they have 56million cash/short term deposits. and the interest rate is 5-7%

Jackpot2010      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 12:28) Posted:

O$P$ Today mkt down marginally but this 1 down >11% to 39c (last done) bcos of this. Avoid shipping trust that r heavily indebted. They paid interest >10% on borrowings - how to survive?. Richmers Maritime is another 1 that is sinking. Not vested.



commando      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 12:12) Posted:

FSL own $? I told they have cash $28 million ? i vested alot leh. vun scare me.


 
 
holywolf50
    09-Jun-2010 12:29  
Contact    Quote!
hmm i dont think they will have any problem. they got the 6 mil deposits for the 2 ship.
 
 
Jackpot2010
    09-Jun-2010 12:28  
Contact    Quote!

O$P$ Today mkt down marginally but this 1 down >11% to 39c (last done) bcos of this. Avoid shipping trust that r heavily indebted. They paid interest >10% on borrowings - how to survive?. Richmers Maritime is another 1 that is sinking. Not vested.



commando      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 12:12) Posted:

FSL own $? I told they have cash $28 million ? i vested alot leh. vun scare me.

 
 
nickyng
    09-Jun-2010 12:12  
Contact    Quote!
hee....jump?!?! nah...SHORT !! yes !! :P

Jackpot2010      ( Date: 09-Jun-2010 12:01) Posted:

O$P$. So far 2, one vessel after another, seized by creditors. Sinking fast....jump!

 
 
commando
    09-Jun-2010 12:12  
Contact    Quote!
FSL own $? I told they have cash $28 million ? i vested alot leh. vun scare me.
 

 
Jackpot2010
    09-Jun-2010 12:01  
Contact    Quote!
O$P$. So far 2, one vessel after another, seized by creditors. Sinking fast....jump!
 
 
grandmaster89
    21-May-2010 22:16  
Contact    Quote!
The report mentioned vessel acquisitions...wonder how long more haha !!!

pharoah88      ( Date: 21-May-2010 15:18) Posted:

Shipping trusts: Not out of the woods yet

Summary: Pacific Shipping Trust (PST), FSL Trust (FSLT) and Rickmers Maritime [RMT, NOT RATED] all reported YoY declines in 1Q10 DPU primarily due to lower distribution payout levels. RMT has reached an agreement with its lenders, but it is fairly restrictive – in our view – as RMT cannot exert much control over its cash flows. RMT could just bide its time under these agreements or possibly raise fresh equity (with a much recovered unit price) and get out of these restrictive agreements. In sharp counterpoint to the RMT developments, FSLT announced earlier this month that a charterer has re-delivered two of its product tankers. The sector, in our view, remains highly vulnerable due to counterparty risks – and this incident highlights that the broader shipping industry is not out of the woods yet. We expect both PST and FSLT to acquire new vessels this year but the key challenge will be to secure high quality counterparties and still make an accretive deal. Maintain NEUTRALview. PST is our preferred pick because of its balance sheet strength. (Meenal Kumar)


 
 
pharoah88
    21-May-2010 15:18  
Contact    Quote!
Shipping trusts: Not out of the woods yet

Summary: Pacific Shipping Trust (PST), FSL Trust (FSLT) and Rickmers Maritime [RMT, NOT RATED] all reported YoY declines in 1Q10 DPU primarily due to lower distribution payout levels. RMT has reached an agreement with its lenders, but it is fairly restrictive – in our view – as RMT cannot exert much control over its cash flows. RMT could just bide its time under these agreements or possibly raise fresh equity (with a much recovered unit price) and get out of these restrictive agreements. In sharp counterpoint to the RMT developments, FSLT announced earlier this month that a charterer has re-delivered two of its product tankers. The sector, in our view, remains highly vulnerable due to counterparty risks – and this incident highlights that the broader shipping industry is not out of the woods yet. We expect both PST and FSLT to acquire new vessels this year but the key challenge will be to secure high quality counterparties and still make an accretive deal. Maintain NEUTRALview. PST is our preferred pick because of its balance sheet strength. (Meenal Kumar)

 
 
grandmaster89
    21-May-2010 13:42  
Contact    Quote!
I am waiting for the revised DPU first before entering again haha. Buy slowly...shipping recovery still in the embryonic stage. Though, announcements of vessel acquisition may boost the unit price slightly.
 
 
lynnlee
    21-May-2010 13:22  
Contact    Quote!
Want to buy in some more to average out, but dont think it hits the bottom yet
 
Important: Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy .