
grandmaster89 ( Date: 01-Feb-2010 13:02) Posted:
|
nickyng ( Date: 01-Feb-2010 13:52) Posted:
|
Why people foolishly pay $1.50 for something that doesn't earn a dime nor is even solvent ??? Its NAV and EPS is NEGATIVE !!!!
Temasek sold something that is worth less than zero for over a dollar. Super brilliant haha
We just talked a momoent ago, now SGX announce agan :-
I like the new term Tomasek, maybe call Tomatosek. That is why long time I heard their motto, earn or whatsoever, grab as much as it can from internal (Spore) and spend at external (Globalisation). I hear from friend recently they lost quite a big chunk in US property investment, so need some spare $$ to tight through. I heard from my friend. Don't know accurate or not. Don't sue me, I just heard from friends. Last year paper lost S$58B, now need to recoup back er ! LOL.
Very "Chik art" (hokkien), always those old uncle and old auntie don't know and they just follow wave to invest ipo. Now all die straight straight ! Maybe those who still hold this counter should gather all their strength $$ to stablise again ! LOL and good luck.
If only Tiger airway could stabalise people's weight! LOL So that people will be more weight concious if they wanna travel by budget airline . Those weigh 100kg and above must pay extra together with their luggage weight for one winter cloth of XXXL is already few kg heavier than normal size people.
ozone2002 ( Date: 28-Jan-2010 15:07) Posted:
|
almost everyday got stablisation trade..
it's as good as US providing "quantitative easing" (read: print $$)
how much steroids can u give a drug addict before he realises the only way to recover is to go cold turkey?
My own view is budget airlines should be restricted to 'budget terminal' for the fares the passengers paid for are much much cheaper than 'full fare'....that is why the word 'budget'.. If want to enjoy the luxury of that kind of world class service like SIA and to enjoy that kind of ambient T1 and T2 at Changi airport, for just a 'short haul' flight, i would be more than willing to pay full fare airlines. In a plane, econ / business/ first class are charged at different price and service are different. :)
rpires ( Date: 28-Jan-2010 02:12) Posted:
|
their cost is only S$0.0667, selling @ $1.5 , wat u think?
pg 46 propectus
investors pursuant to the Offering, the total consideration and the effective cash cost to investors in the Offering.
Substantial Shareholders and their Associates:
Number of
Shares
Acquired(1)
Total
Consideration(2)
(S$)
Effective Cash
Cost per Share
(S$)
Singapore Airlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179,009,250 S$11,933,950 S$0.0667
Indigo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,678,000 S$5,845,200 S$0.0667
Ryanasia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,452,000 S$3,896,800 S$0.0667
Dahlia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,185,750 S$2,679,050 S$0.0667
Investors in the Offering. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165,155,000 S$272,505,750 S$1.65
i scold one of friend buying tiger air. ask him why he say cheaper than SQ.
personally i dont think there is much prospect in tiger. what happen if oil raise above $100?
they believe they can grow the corporate client? if market recover, do you think the corporate client will stay loyal to budget carrier? SQ make good profits from business class not just simply on corporate client.
another minus pt i hate is it operate from budget terminal. changi airport is world renowned hub, tourist visit singapore would like the experience of shopping at changi airport. once bitten twice shy, i dont think they ever want to take tioger air next time they come to visit singapore.
knightrider ( Date: 26-Jan-2010 18:17) Posted:
|