Post Reply
10721-10740 of 23260
epliew,
Just treat this forum as a market place. Ignore the noise and absorb those that give constructive views. Then use your judgement and trade wisely. Never love your stock and cut if need be. Good luck.
epliew ( Date: 24-Sep-2010 08:26) Posted:
typo error, "what I do not like to see"
epliew ( Date: 24-Sep-2010 08:21) Posted:
hi all,
i think the purpose of the forum is help to encourage one another to make more profit and not to create fear about this stock or that. I dare to say some people are adding fear for personal reasons..... so they could re-enter market or buy more......
I know the decision to trade in stock market, the purpose is making money. Money is not everything, so lose some money will not die, I strongly believe we should encourage one another instead making assumption with technical analysis. What i do like to see is people killing themselve after making some losses. better advice is trade within your limits.....
For those who believe the stock will be 1.7 tomorrow please show me your charts and explanation?
I wish all singaporean prosper with genting. |
|
|
|
typo error, "what I do not like to see"
epliew ( Date: 24-Sep-2010 08:21) Posted:
hi all,
i think the purpose of the forum is help to encourage one another to make more profit and not to create fear about this stock or that. I dare to say some people are adding fear for personal reasons..... so they could re-enter market or buy more......
I know the decision to trade in stock market, the purpose is making money. Money is not everything, so lose some money will not die, I strongly believe we should encourage one another instead making assumption with technical analysis. What i do like to see is people killing themselve after making some losses. better advice is trade within your limits.....
For those who believe the stock will be 1.7 tomorrow please show me your charts and explanation?
I wish all singaporean prosper with genting. |
|
hi all,
i think the purpose of the forum is help to encourage one another to make more profit and not to create fear about this stock or that. I dare to say some people are adding fear for personal reasons..... so they could re-enter market or buy more......
I know the decision to trade in stock market, the purpose is making money. Money is not everything, so lose some money will not die, I strongly believe we should encourage one another instead making assumption with technical analysis. What i do like to see is people killing themselve after making some losses. better advice is trade within your limits.....
For those who believe the stock will be 1.7 tomorrow please show me your charts and explanation?
I wish all singaporean prosper with genting.
That's why playing shares is dangerous..
Many have already 'dieded' because of playing shares and betting..
I am quite sure that if they are given another chance to come back to this world,
they will almost certainly not be playing shares..
Of course, if it's for entertainmant purposes,
or if the person has highly skilled defensiveness, it is a different story..
But the bottom line is to have humble respect for the stock market beast..
Ya. Below 2.00 sound more logically as investors will scoop up within minutes.
cannotfind ( Date: 24-Sep-2010 00:48) Posted:
you want people to jump out over the window? say so low. can die la
FearValueGreed ( Date: 24-Sep-2010 00:43) Posted:
Buy at 176-180 region.
It will fall back, dun hurry.
then it will hit $2.50 and maybe $3 for those gullible who think it may hit $10, before crashes back to earth |
|
|
|
you want people to jump out over the window? say so low. can die la
FearValueGreed ( Date: 24-Sep-2010 00:43) Posted:
Buy at 176-180 region.
It will fall back, dun hurry.
then it will hit $2.50 and maybe $3 for those gullible who think it may hit $10, before crashes back to earth |
|
Buy at 176-180 region.
It will fall back, dun hurry.
then it will hit $2.50 and maybe $3 for those gullible who think it may hit $10, before crashes back to earth
you are damn right
iPunter ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 21:53) Posted:
Fear of LO$$ is the ultimate protection against loss. Fear of not making enough money is the cause of most losses.. But if one treats every bet as a gamble, one should be okay..
limkt009 ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 21:40) Posted:
| I'm on the fear side....heh |
|
|
|
Fear of LO$$ is the ultimate protection against loss.
Fear of not making enough money is the cause of most losses..
But if one treats every bet as a gamble, one should be okay..
limkt009 ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 21:40) Posted:
I'm on the fear side....hehe
sinetic8 ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 20:09) Posted:
| like one of the forumers said below. now its the battle of fear and faith. so to all bros out there, which side are you on? I'm at the faith side.
|
|
|
|
I'm on the fear side....hehe
sinetic8 ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 20:09) Posted:
| like one of the forumers said below. now its the battle of fear and faith. so to all bros out there, which side are you on? I'm at the faith side.
|
|
yup. i think sentosa is more for sightseeing and family kind of place because of the studio. but i will accumulate at the right price im comfortable with because when they start to give out dividends next time, it wont be this price anymore.
sentosa is an tourist island/attraction. unless no ones visits that island, then genting is a worthless stock. ghost month over liao. superstitious gamblers will start going to "work".
i'm more of long term so therefore even though it corrects, i still have the holding power. short term the life too stressful liao.. can't take it..
cannotfind ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 21:14) Posted:
Also not forgetting those who goes to LVS are really rich. For this coming F1, if you are the drivers, which one will you go to? More will be spending time or even stay in LVS hotel since the track is there. Genting will flourish once Universal is completed. Somemore no dividend for 2 years. Ignore this is genting and any ordinary share, will you push it till this limit knowingly there is no dividend? Anyway, it is a good share if you keep for long term. Ghost month just ended, many baby ghost will get Genting to win.
sinetic8 ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 20:14) Posted:
(From THE WALL STREET JOURNAL)
By John Jannarone
[Financial Analysis and Commentary]
Leaving Las Vegas usually pays off.
That's even true of casino giant Las Vegas Sands, which apparently
decided to diversify away from the Strip just in time. In 2006, when
Vegas was booming, Sands won rights to build a multibillion-dollar
casino in Singapore, where gambling was previously forbidden. Not long
after, investors began to panic over Sands' leverage, and exposure to
Vegas, at one point sending its shares down 99% from their 2007 peak.
But the gamble on the equator has begun to pay off. Sands shares have
more than doubled this year, with much of the gain coming since the
Singapore casino opened in April. Based on July's figures, the Marina
Bay Sands casino is earning an annualized $1 billion of earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. That has helped boost
consensus 2011 Ebitda estimates for the whole company to $2.4 billion,
from $1.7 billion a year ago.
The house odds in Singapore are tough to beat. Sands and Genting
Singapore each have exclusive rights to operate a casino on the island
for ten years without competition. The two casinos are on track to be
the world's most profitable next year. This success reflects more than
novelty value. History shows gamblers in the region tend to stick to
their habits, through thick and thin. Genting Malaysia has seen gambling
revenue at its Malaysia operations rise between 2004 and 2009 at a 15%
annualized rate.
Singapore has other advantages. The country has spent decades
developing travel, business and tourist infrastructure. It is likely no
coincidence that Singapore attracts gamblers from places like China,
even though the gambling Mecca of Macau is much closer. Chinese visitors
rose 63% in July from a year earlier, says Singapore's tourism board.
One risk is the Singapore government introduces rules that stifle the
casino business. The government is keen to limit crime rates and
gambling addiction among its citizens. But so far, government has
targeted restrictions at low-income locals, which only account for a few
percentage points of gambling revenue. Even tighter restrictions likely
wouldn't be a catastrophe.
The greater risk is a sharp economic slowdown that crimps regional
tourism. But Sands deserves extra points for its Singapore
diversification, which may account for half its profit next year. Rivals
Wynn Resorts and MGM Resorts International have made progress in Macau,
where competition is fierce. J.P. Morgan's Joseph Greff estimates Sands
has an enterprise value of 13.9 times 2011 Ebitda, compared with 11.1
times for Wynn and 12.5 times for MGM.
While it's tempting to choose the cheaper stock, Sands' growth potential is worth the extra chips.
Click here to go to Dow Jones NewsPlus, a web front page of today's
most important business and market news, analysis and commentary:
http://www.djnewsplus.com/access/al?rnd=x0HdyTTXWp5x1ZmlkZApxA%3D%3D.
You can use this link on the day this article is published and the
following day.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 22, 2010 20:12 ET (00:12 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Also not forgetting those who goes to LVS are really rich. For this coming F1, if you are the drivers, which one will you go to? More will be spending time or even stay in LVS hotel since the track is there. Genting will flourish once Universal is completed. Somemore no dividend for 2 years. Ignore this is genting and any ordinary share, will you push it till this limit knowingly there is no dividend? Anyway, it is a good share if you keep for long term. Ghost month just ended, many baby ghost will get Genting to win.
sinetic8 ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 20:14) Posted:
(From THE WALL STREET JOURNAL)
By John Jannarone
[Financial Analysis and Commentary]
Leaving Las Vegas usually pays off.
That's even true of casino giant Las Vegas Sands, which apparently
decided to diversify away from the Strip just in time. In 2006, when
Vegas was booming, Sands won rights to build a multibillion-dollar
casino in Singapore, where gambling was previously forbidden. Not long
after, investors began to panic over Sands' leverage, and exposure to
Vegas, at one point sending its shares down 99% from their 2007 peak.
But the gamble on the equator has begun to pay off. Sands shares have
more than doubled this year, with much of the gain coming since the
Singapore casino opened in April. Based on July's figures, the Marina
Bay Sands casino is earning an annualized $1 billion of earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. That has helped boost
consensus 2011 Ebitda estimates for the whole company to $2.4 billion,
from $1.7 billion a year ago.
The house odds in Singapore are tough to beat. Sands and Genting
Singapore each have exclusive rights to operate a casino on the island
for ten years without competition. The two casinos are on track to be
the world's most profitable next year. This success reflects more than
novelty value. History shows gamblers in the region tend to stick to
their habits, through thick and thin. Genting Malaysia has seen gambling
revenue at its Malaysia operations rise between 2004 and 2009 at a 15%
annualized rate.
Singapore has other advantages. The country has spent decades
developing travel, business and tourist infrastructure. It is likely no
coincidence that Singapore attracts gamblers from places like China,
even though the gambling Mecca of Macau is much closer. Chinese visitors
rose 63% in July from a year earlier, says Singapore's tourism board.
One risk is the Singapore government introduces rules that stifle the
casino business. The government is keen to limit crime rates and
gambling addiction among its citizens. But so far, government has
targeted restrictions at low-income locals, which only account for a few
percentage points of gambling revenue. Even tighter restrictions likely
wouldn't be a catastrophe.
The greater risk is a sharp economic slowdown that crimps regional
tourism. But Sands deserves extra points for its Singapore
diversification, which may account for half its profit next year. Rivals
Wynn Resorts and MGM Resorts International have made progress in Macau,
where competition is fierce. J.P. Morgan's Joseph Greff estimates Sands
has an enterprise value of 13.9 times 2011 Ebitda, compared with 11.1
times for Wynn and 12.5 times for MGM.
While it's tempting to choose the cheaper stock, Sands' growth potential is worth the extra chips.
Click here to go to Dow Jones NewsPlus, a web front page of today's
most important business and market news, analysis and commentary:
http://www.djnewsplus.com/access/al?rnd=x0HdyTTXWp5x1ZmlkZApxA%3D%3D.
You can use this link on the day this article is published and the
following day.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 22, 2010 20:12 ET (00:12 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
sinetic8 ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 20:09) Posted:
| like one of the forumers said below. now its the battle of fear and faith. so to all bros out there, which side are you on? I'm at the faith side.
|
|
|
|
Thu: 23 SEP 2010 CLOSING
after 330pm kInder playtImes
Thu: 23 SEP 2010 CLOSING
| e Genting HK US$ |
S21 |
i |
-- |
USD |
0.500 |
|
-0.015 |
-2.9 |
67,589,000 |
5,167,000 |
0.500 |
0.505 |
1,430,000 |
0.515 |
0.515 |
0.520 |
0.495 |
M |
-- |
SGX |
S21 |
GENH.SI |
| GENTING BHD |
3182 |
i |
CD |
MYR |
9.930 |
|
-0.450 |
-4.3 |
6,557,400 |
141,400 |
9.930 |
9.980 |
5,000 |
10.360 |
10.380 |
10.360 |
9.880 |
-- |
-- |
KLS |
3182 |
GENT.KL |
| GENTING MYS BHD |
4715 |
i |
CD |
MYR |
3.420 |
|
-0.080 |
-2.3 |
10,771,500 |
62,700 |
3.420 |
3.430 |
26,100 |
3.500 |
3.500 |
3.540 |
3.400 |
-- |
-- |
KLS |
4715 |
GENM.KL |
| Genting SP |
G13 |
i |
-- |
SGD |
2.070 |
|
-0.030 |
-1.4 |
73,158,000 |
6,229,000 |
2.060 |
2.070 |
1,882,000 |
2.100 |
2.100 |
2.110 |
2.060 |
M |
-- |
SGX |
G13 |
GENS.SI |
| GentingSMBLeCW120402 |
J2UW |
i |
-- |
SGD |
0.255 |
|
-0.015 |
-5.6 |
50,000 |
15,000 |
0.255 |
0.280 |
20,000 |
0.255 |
0.270 |
0.255 |
0.255 |
M |
-- |
SGX |
J2UW |
GNML_td.SI |
| GentingSMBLeCW130103 |
L2PW |
i |
-- |
SGD |
0.210 |
|
-0.005 |
-2.3 |
98,000 |
100,000 |
0.160 |
0.225 |
25,000 |
0.215 |
0.215 |
0.215 |
0.210 |
-- |
-- |
SGX |
L2PW |
GNML_tm.SI |
| GentingSMBLeCW130104 |
L7KW |
i |
-- |
SGD |
0.170 |
|
-0.005 |
-2.9 |
585,000 |
15,000 |
0.160 |
0.195 |
10,000 |
0.170 |
0.175 |
0.170 |
0.170 |
-- |
-- |
SGX |
L7KW |
GNML_tr.SI |
| GentingSMBLeCW130603 |
L0QW |
i |
-- |
SGD |
0.270 |
|
-0.020 |
-6.9 |
50,000 |
100,000 |
0.210 |
0.315 |
8,000 |
0.285 |
0.290 |
0.285 |
0.270 |
M |
| Stock |
Code |
i |
Rmk |
Ccy |
Last |
|
$Chng |
%Chng |
Vol |
Buy Vol |
Buy |
Sell |
Sell Vol |
Open |
Previous |
Day Hi |
Day Lo |
Ind |
Sector |
Mkt |
Off Code |
Feed Code |
COC BB |
COC LD |
COC BS |
| GMG |
5IM |
i |
-- |
SGD |
0.285 |
|
+0.015 |
+5.6 |
188,943,000 |
3,738,000 |
0.280 |
0.285 |
683,000 |
0.275 |
0.270 |
0.300 |
0.275 |
M |
-- |
SGX |
5IM |
GMGG.SI |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| UMS |
558 |
i |
-- |
SGD |
0.480 |
|
+0.015 |
+3.2 |
88,014,000 |
1,512,000 |
0.480 |
0.485 |
392,000 |
0.470 |
0.465 |
0.505 |
0.470 |
C,M |
-- |
SGX |
558 |
UMSH.SI |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Adventus |
5EF |
i |
-- |
SGD |
0.060 |
|
+0.005 |
+9.1 |
76,628,000 |
9,190,000 |
0.060 |
0.065 |
3,641,000 |
0.075 |
0.055 |
0.080 |
0.060 |
C,M |
-- |
SGX |
5EF |
ADVE.SI |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Genting SP |
G13 |
i |
-- |
SGD |
2.070 |
|
-0.030 |
-1.4 |
73,158,000 |
6,229,000 |
2.060 |
2.070 |
1,882,000 |
2.100 |
2.100 |
2.110 |
2.060 |
M |
-- |
SGX |
G13 |
GENS.SI |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| ChinaNTown |
D4N |
i |
-- |
SGD |
0.150 |
|
+0.010 |
+7.1 |
70,308,000 |
8,467,000 |
0.145 |
0.150 |
7,478,000 |
0.140 |
0.140 |
0.155 |
0.135 |
M |
-- |
SGX |
D4N |
CNTW.SI |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| e Genting HK US$ |
S21 |
i |
-- |
USD |
0.500 |
|
-0.015 |
-2.9 |
67,589,000 |
5,167,000 |
0.500 |
0.505 |
1,430,000 |
0.515 |
0.515 |
0.520 |
0.495 |
M |
-- |
SGX |
S21 |
GENH.SI |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| PLife REIT |
C2PU |
i |
-- |
SGD |
1.580 |
|
-0.090 |
-5.4 |
64,145,000 |
203,000 |
1.580 |
1.590 |
275,000 |
1.600 |
1.670 |
1.620 |
1.570 |
C,M |
-- |
SGX |
C2PU |
PWLR.SI |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| ChinaOilFld |
DT2 |
i |
-- |
SGD |
0.120 |
|
+0.010 |
+9.1 |
59,131,000 |
430,000 |
0.120 |
0.125 |
29,000 |
0.115 |
0.110 |
0.140 |
0.110 |
M |
-- |
SGX |
DT2 |
COFT.SI |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| CoscoCorp |
F83 |
i |
-- |
SGD |
1.850 |
|
+0.080 |
+4.5 |
57,061,000 |
518,000 |
1.840 |
1.850 |
595,000 |
1.790 |
1.770 |
1.880 |
1.770 |
C,M |
If one must need faith,
it is best to have faith in the chart..
rather than divine blessing..
Because for what you know,
the divine one may not want you to play shares..
(From THE WALL STREET JOURNAL)
By John Jannarone
[Financial Analysis and Commentary]
Leaving Las Vegas usually pays off.
That's even true of casino giant Las Vegas Sands, which apparently
decided to diversify away from the Strip just in time. In 2006, when
Vegas was booming, Sands won rights to build a multibillion-dollar
casino in Singapore, where gambling was previously forbidden. Not long
after, investors began to panic over Sands' leverage, and exposure to
Vegas, at one point sending its shares down 99% from their 2007 peak.
But the gamble on the equator has begun to pay off. Sands shares have
more than doubled this year, with much of the gain coming since the
Singapore casino opened in April. Based on July's figures, the Marina
Bay Sands casino is earning an annualized $1 billion of earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. That has helped boost
consensus 2011 Ebitda estimates for the whole company to $2.4 billion,
from $1.7 billion a year ago.
The house odds in Singapore are tough to beat. Sands and Genting
Singapore each have exclusive rights to operate a casino on the island
for ten years without competition. The two casinos are on track to be
the world's most profitable next year. This success reflects more than
novelty value. History shows gamblers in the region tend to stick to
their habits, through thick and thin. Genting Malaysia has seen gambling
revenue at its Malaysia operations rise between 2004 and 2009 at a 15%
annualized rate.
Singapore has other advantages. The country has spent decades
developing travel, business and tourist infrastructure. It is likely no
coincidence that Singapore attracts gamblers from places like China,
even though the gambling Mecca of Macau is much closer. Chinese visitors
rose 63% in July from a year earlier, says Singapore's tourism board.
One risk is the Singapore government introduces rules that stifle the
casino business. The government is keen to limit crime rates and
gambling addiction among its citizens. But so far, government has
targeted restrictions at low-income locals, which only account for a few
percentage points of gambling revenue. Even tighter restrictions likely
wouldn't be a catastrophe.
The greater risk is a sharp economic slowdown that crimps regional
tourism. But Sands deserves extra points for its Singapore
diversification, which may account for half its profit next year. Rivals
Wynn Resorts and MGM Resorts International have made progress in Macau,
where competition is fierce. J.P. Morgan's Joseph Greff estimates Sands
has an enterprise value of 13.9 times 2011 Ebitda, compared with 11.1
times for Wynn and 12.5 times for MGM.
While it's tempting to choose the cheaper stock, Sands' growth potential is worth the extra chips.
Click here to go to Dow Jones NewsPlus, a web front page of today's
most important business and market news, analysis and commentary:
http://www.djnewsplus.com/access/al?rnd=x0HdyTTXWp5x1ZmlkZApxA%3D%3D.
You can use this link on the day this article is published and the
following day.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 22, 2010 20:12 ET (00:12 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
sinetic8 ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 20:09) Posted:
| like one of the forumers said below. now its the battle of fear and faith. so to all bros out there, which side are you on? I'm at the faith side.
|
|
like one of the forumers said below. now its the battle of fear and faith. so to all bros out there, which side are you on? I'm at the faith side.
If you entered @2.02, what is your cut-loss point, if any?
Or hold till it recovers?
cannotfind ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 19:45) Posted:
So put an order at 2.02 tomorrow. Will be ok. See LVS shares. It is going up. Got 2 casinos. 1 up, 1 down to balance the equilibrium. Like yin and yang.
bishan22 ( Date: 23-Sep-2010 18:49) Posted:
Today another black candle, now 3 in a row. Next support may be 2.00.  |
|
|
|
