Post Reply
101-120 of 661
Hi pilotfish,
Btw, pardon me as I m not good at Elliot wave, find it to complex and subjective, particularly with the labeling of the waves n sub-waves and all the rules, too many rules and waves n sub-waves till my head goes bonkers.
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 23:13) Posted:
|
Hi pilotfish,
Agree with u tat must at least 5 waves (a-b-c-d-e), wat I mean by 3 waves (a-b-c) is that
the a-b-c of the 5 wave forms the "a" of the 3 wave and the d-e of the 5 wave is the b-c of the 3 wave.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 23:03) Posted:
|
Hi richtan,
Nope. For triangle or wedge, there must be at least 5 waves, each wave must consist 3 sub waves.
For A-B-C correction 5-3-5 or 3-3-5. |
|
|
|
Hi pilotfish,
Agree with u tat must at least 5 waves (a-b-c-d-e), wat I mean by 3 waves (a-b-c) is that
the a-b-c of the 5 wave forms the "a" of the 3 wave and the d-e of the 5 wave is the b-c of the 3 wave.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 23:03) Posted:
|
Hi richtan,
Nope. For triangle or wedge, there must be at least 5 waves, each wave must consist 3 sub waves.
For A-B-C correction 5-3-5 or 3-3-5.
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 22:31) Posted:
|
Hi pilotfish,
Many thanks, I got wat u mean.
So it can either be viewed as 5 wave (a-b-c-d-e) or 3 wave (a-b-c) depending on how we labeled it. |
|
|
|
Yes, my view is , it may move down to test the lower sloping support at 13.5 and if it manage to bounce from there, then the contracting triangle is valid with a-b-c correction but if it breaks below it, then the contracting trlangle is void n next support at 12.5
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 22:51) Posted:
Hi richtan,
Thanks for sharing the chart. Notice the price is down with increasing volume not a good sign. 
Agrre with bintang. Hongx is not likely to rebounce in near term...
Just my view |
|
Hi richtan,
Nope. For triangle or wedge, there must be at least 5 waves, each wave must consist 3 sub waves.
For A-B-C correction 5-3-5 or 3-3-5.
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 22:31) Posted:
|
Hi pilotfish,
Many thanks, I got wat u mean.
So it can either be viewed as 5 wave (a-b-c-d-e) or 3 wave (a-b-c) depending on how we labeled it.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 22:22) Posted:
Oops, don't know what went wrong. Repost, should be able to see now.
Ogrinal chart copied here.
The whole correction is a 5 waves triangle. replaceing 1 and 2 with D and E respectively. Chart relabelled:
The whole correction is an a-b-c correction. A shifted, Move B to 1 and and C to 2. Chart relabelled:
Hope this clarifies. |
|
|
|
Hi richtan,
Thanks for sharing the chart. Notice the price is down with increasing volume not a good sign.
Agrre with bintang. Hongx is not likely to rebounce in near term...
Just my view
Below is my daily chart analysis for sharing and exchange pointers.
My TA chart is posted to share n exchange pointers with those TA practitioner whom believes in TA.
If u are a TA detractor, plse just ignore n refrain from peeping at my chart posting n start
making unconstructive comments.
This is only my view n I may be right or wrong, so dyodd.
Hi pilotfish,
Many thanks, I got wat u mean.
So it can either be viewed as 5 wave (a-b-c-d-e) or 3 wave (a-b-c) depending on how we labeled it.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 22:22) Posted:
Oops, don't know what went wrong. Repost, should be able to see now.
Ogrinal chart copied here.
The whole correction is a 5 waves triangle. replaceing 1 and 2 with D and E respectively. Chart relabelled:
The whole correction is an a-b-c correction. A shifted, Move B to 1 and and C to 2. Chart relabelled:
Hope this clarifies. |
|
China Hongx 's chart is very weak today , sell signal is almost generated from the Exponential moving average ribbons indicator . if it could not rebound in the near term , the down trend would be confirmed . The next target would be at 12.5 cents , this is the lower point of the hammer created on 23 Jun .
Oops, don't know what went wrong. Repost, should be able to see now.
Ogrinal chart copied here.
The whole correction is a 5 waves triangle. replaceing 1 and 2 with D and E respectively. Chart relabelled:
The whole correction is an a-b-c correction. A shifted, Move B to 1 and and C to 2. Chart relabelled:
Hope this clarifies.
Could not click to open
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 14:57) Posted:
Hi pilotfish,
I dun see any chart at all but can see all other charts in the forum.
Can u see the chart u posted?
Can kindly re-post the chart |
|
Hi pilotfish,
I dun see any chart at all but can see all other charts in the forum.
Can u see the chart u posted?
Can kindly re-post the chart
Ok. Ogrinal chart copied here.
The whole correction is a 5 waves triangle. replaceing 1 and 2 with D and E respectively. Chart relabelled:
The whole correction is an a-b-c correction. Move B to 1 and and C to 2.
Chart relabelled:
Hope this clarifies.
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 11:22) Posted:
|
Hi pilotfish,
Soory to trouble u, Is it possible for u to kindly post a chart to explain as I can't figure out from your explanation.
Thanks a lot for your effort.
It is great tat we have a healthy exchange of views as at times we can be wrong in our interpretation.
Yes, I agree with u tat CHHX needs to come down 1st to complete the corrective wave b4 it can resume the up wave.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 11:01) Posted:
|
It depends on how we look at it.
The whole correction is a 5 waves triangle. replaceing 1 and 2 with D and E respectively.
The whole correction is an a-b-c correction. Move B to 1 and and C to 2.
Comparing the chart from Hongx. To continue with the upwards move, price has to come down first to satisfy a positive divergence.
That's my view... |
|
|
|
Hi Fellow TA practitioner,
There is a wealth of TA stuff here, hope after learning, we can all share n contribute so tat we can exchange pointers n learn our mistakes or confirm our view with one another.
https://chartnexus.com/learning/
Hi pilotfish,
Soory to trouble u, Is it possible for u to kindly post a chart to explain as I can't figure out from your explanation.
Thanks a lot for your effort.
It is great tat we have a healthy exchange of views as at times we can be wrong in our interpretation.
Yes, I agree with u tat CHHX needs to come down 1st to complete the corrective wave b4 it can resume the up wave.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 11:01) Posted:
|
It depends on how we look at it.
The whole correction is a 5 waves triangle. replaceing 1 and 2 with D and E respectively.
The whole correction is an a-b-c correction. Move B to 1 and and C to 2.
Comparing the chart from Hongx. To continue with the upwards move, price has to come down first to satisfy a positive divergence.
That's my view...
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 10:28) Posted:
|
Hi pilotfish,
U keep saying tat "A triangle will need at least 5 waves", but then look at the 2nd chart
"Couer D Alene Mines (CDE) - Nov 12th 2003" in
http://www.e-wavecharts.com/elliottwave/elliottwave.htm
which is a contracting triangle.
It doesn't look like 5 waves, more of a-b-c, 3 wave correction.
Wat I m saying is - triangles correction need not necessary be a 5 wave correction, can also be a 3 wave a-b-c correction.
This is just a discussion, exchange of views, wat is your comments or any articles to support your view tat triangles must have 5 wave correction as tat 2nd chart (a contracting triangle) doesn't look like a 5 wave, more of a 3 wave a-b-c correction.
|
|
|
|
It depends on how we look at it.
The whole correction is a 5 waves triangle. replaceing 1 and 2 with D and E respectively.
The whole correction is an a-b-c correction. Move B to 1 and and C to 2.
Comparing the chart from Hongx. To continue with the upwards move, price has to come down first to satisfy a positive divergence.
That's my view...
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 10:28) Posted:
|
Hi pilotfish,
U keep saying tat "A triangle will need at least 5 waves", but then look at the 2nd chart
"Couer D Alene Mines (CDE) - Nov 12th 2003" in
http://www.e-wavecharts.com/elliottwave/elliottwave.htm
which is a contracting triangle.
It doesn't look like 5 waves, more of a-b-c, 3 wave correction.
Wat I m saying is - triangles correction need not necessary be a 5 wave correction, can also be a 3 wave a-b-c correction.
This is just a discussion, exchange of views, wat is your comments or any articles to support your view tat triangles must have 5 wave correction as tat 2nd chart (a contracting triangle) doesn't look like a 5 wave, more of a 3 wave a-b-c correction.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 10:00) Posted:
|
No it's not a triangle. A triangle will need at least 5 waves.
For a-b-c correction, it may retrace to 0.16 or 0.14 or worst 0.12.
Currently support at 0.16. See how it goes. |
|
|
|
Hi pilotfish,
U keep saying tat "A triangle will need at least 5 waves", but then look at the 2nd chart
"Couer D Alene Mines (CDE) - Nov 12th 2003" in
http://www.e-wavecharts.com/elliottwave/elliottwave.htm
which is a contracting triangle.
It doesn't look like 5 waves, more of a-b-c, 3 wave correction.
Wat I m saying is - triangles correction need not necessary be a 5 wave correction, can also be a 3 wave a-b-c correction.
This is just a discussion, exchange of views, wat is your comments or any articles to support your view tat triangles must have 5 wave correction as tat 2nd chart (a contracting triangle) doesn't look like a 5 wave, more of a 3 wave a-b-c correction.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 10:00) Posted:
|
No it's not a triangle. A triangle will need at least 5 waves.
For a-b-c correction, it may retrace to 0.16 or 0.14 or worst 0.12.
Currently support at 0.16. See how it goes.
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 09:55) Posted:
| Yes, I agree with u, it could be possibly undergoing a-b-c, 3 wave bullish contracting triangle pattern correction |
|
|
|
0,16 support already broken. Hongx is down for the next support....
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 10:00) Posted:
|
No it's not a triangle. A triangle will need at least 5 waves.
For a-b-c correction, it may retrace to 0.16 or 0.14 or worst 0.12.
Currently support at 0.16. See how it goes.
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 09:55) Posted:
| Yes, I agree with u, it could be possibly undergoing a-b-c, 3 wave bullish contracting triangle pattern correction |
|
|
|
No it's not a triangle. A triangle will need at least 5 waves.
For a-b-c correction, it may retrace to 0.16 or 0.14 or worst 0.12.
Currently support at 0.16. See how it goes.
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 09:55) Posted:
Yes, I agree with u, it could be possibly undergoing a-b-c, 3 wave bullish contracting triangle pattern correction.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 09:42) Posted:
| No it doesn't look like a double 3. An a-b-c correction is more likely to be formed. Just my view.. |
|
|
|
Yes, I agree with u, it could be possibly undergoing a-b-c, 3 wave bullish contracting triangle pattern correction.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 09:42) Posted:
No it doesn't look like a double 3. An a-b-c correction is more likely to be formed. Just my view...
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 09:30) Posted:
|
|
|
Hi pilotfish,
Look at the 2nd chart "Couer D Alene Mines (CDE) - Nov 12th 2003" in
http://www.e-wavecharts.com/elliottwave/elliottwave.htm
It doesn't look like 5 waves, more of a-b-c, 3 wave correction.
Wat I m saying is - triangles correction need not necessary be a 5 wave correction, can also be a 3 wave a-b-c correction.
pilotfish ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 09:30) Posted:
|
Link from CSI http://www.sharejunction.com/sharejunction/listMessage.htm?topicId=6517&searchString=
CHHX look more like a double 3. Well still earlier to say.
Wedge or triangle need at least 5 waves.
Just my view...
richtan ( Date: 13-Jul-2009 00:52) Posted:
|
Hi pilotfish,
CHHX is probably currently in the process of forming the contracting triangle continuation pattern.
Tat pattern will be void if it breaks below the sloping support line in the next few days.
Contracting triangle works on both daily n weekly chart n need not fulfil the 5 wave pattern, take a look at tat 2nd chart mentioned, it does not look like having 5 waves.
|
|
|
|
