User Research/Opinions   

11 reasons stocks will storm back soon

Uniquely Singapore!

pharoah88      ( Date: 17-Jun-2011 10:52) Posted: By Channel NewsAsia, Updated: 17/06/2011 Expat alleges overcharging by Boat Quay seafood restaurant   Forum Seafood along Boat Quay which charged $1,107.32 for a lunch for two persons. (TODAY Photo) SINGAPORE: Company director Ian McArthur could hardly believe his eyes when he saw the bill for lunch with his friend on Wednesday: It came up to $1,107.32, including S$348.80 for a 1.6kg lobster and $564 for a 3kg crab. The Scot, who has been working here since last October, told TODAY: " I thought, ’It must be wrong. I can’t believe this.’" Mr McArthur then approached the staff of Forum Seafood Village — a restaurant at Boat Quay — seeking an explanation. He was told that those were the market prices. But Mr McArthur told TODAY that the staff did not inform them how much the crustaceans weighed or the total cost before cooking the food. " It wasn’t just the price. We feel that we were misled that’s why we were upset about it," he added. Apart from the king crab and lobster, Mr McArthur and his friend had a plate of fried rice and four glasses of beer. Alleging that he was " grossly overcharged" , Mr McArthur filed a complaint with the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) on Wednesday against the restaurant, seeking a S$900 refund. But Mr Vincent Hoh, a restaurant employee who served Mr McArthur, said he told the diners the crustaceans’ weight. When asked if he told the diners the total cost of the crustaceans, Mr Hoh replied he did not. Forum Seafood Village manager Jo Chia said the restaurant does not usually inform diners of the total price of their seafood, unless diners ask for it. Said Ms Chia: " We tried to tell customers (the total price) but some guests say it’s too troublesome and tell us not to bother them." Some patrons have also commented that, by informing them of the total price, the staff would be suggesting that they could not afford it, Mr Hoh said. Ms Chia pointed out the restaurant’s seafood prices are listed clearly — according to cost per 100g — at the restaurant’s entrance and on the menu. " Our prices are market prices. We won’t overcharge our customers," she said. Ms Chia said the restaurant’s owner is overseas and has not decided on its course of action with regard to the complaint. Forum Seafood Village, which operates two outlets along Boat Quay, charges S$21.80 per 100g for the Australian lobster and S$18.80 per 100g for the king crab, after discounts. The usual prices were S$32 and S$25 per 100g for the lobster and king crab, respectively. A check with neighbouring restaurants found one restaurant charging S$18.80 per 100g for the Australian lobster and another charging S$10 per 100g for Alaskan King Crab. Responding to TODAY’s queries, CASE said it has received 12 complaints for overcharging by food and beverage outlets in the first five months of this year. There were 27 complaints last year, up from 15 in 2009. — TODAY

 

Expat alleges overcharging by Boat Quay seafood restaurant

 

Forum Seafood along Boat Quay which charged $1,107.32 for a lunch for two persons. (TODAY Photo)

SINGAPORE: Company director Ian McArthur could hardly believe his eyes when he saw the bill for lunch with his friend on Wednesday: It came up to $1,107.32, including S$348.80 for a 1.6kg lobster and $564 for a 3kg crab.

The Scot, who has been working here since last October, told TODAY: " I thought, ’It must be wrong. I can’t believe this.’"

Mr McArthur then approached the staff of Forum Seafood Village — a restaurant at Boat Quay — seeking an explanation. He was told that those were the market prices.

But Mr McArthur told TODAY that the staff did not inform them how much the crustaceans weighed or the total cost before cooking the food. " It wasn’t just the price. We feel that we were misled that’s why we were upset about it," he added.

Apart from the king crab and lobster, Mr McArthur and his friend had a plate of fried rice and four glasses of beer.

Alleging that he was " grossly overcharged" , Mr McArthur filed a complaint with the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) on Wednesday against the restaurant, seeking a S$900 refund.

But Mr Vincent Hoh, a restaurant employee who served Mr McArthur, said he told the diners the crustaceans’ weight. When asked if he told the diners the total cost of the crustaceans, Mr Hoh replied he did not.

Forum Seafood Village manager Jo Chia said the restaurant does not usually inform diners of the total price of their seafood, unless diners ask for it.

Said Ms Chia: " We tried to tell customers (the total price) but some guests say it’s too troublesome and tell us not to bother them."

Some patrons have also commented that, by informing them of the total price, the staff would be suggesting that they could not afford it, Mr Hoh said.

Ms Chia pointed out the restaurant’s seafood prices are listed clearly — according to cost per 100g — at the restaurant’s entrance and on the menu. " Our prices are market prices. We won’t overcharge our customers," she said.

Ms Chia said the restaurant’s owner is overseas and has not decided on its course of action with regard to the complaint.

Forum Seafood Village, which operates two outlets along Boat Quay, charges S$21.80 per 100g for the Australian lobster and S$18.80 per 100g for the king crab, after discounts. The usual prices were S$32 and S$25 per 100g for the lobster and king crab, respectively.

A check with neighbouring restaurants found one restaurant charging S$18.80 per 100g for the Australian lobster and another charging S$10 per 100g for Alaskan King Crab.

Responding to TODAY’s queries, CASE said it has received 12 complaints for overcharging by food and beverage outlets in the first five months of this year. There were 27 complaints last year, up from 15 in 2009. —

TODAY

 

Commentary: There is cause for concern but it’s not all doom and gloom
By Jeff Reeves

ROCKVILLE, Md. (MarketWatch) — Things have been bleak on Wall Street lately and many investors are wondering if they should call it quits. After all, it’s been a pretty good run on Wall Street across the last 18 to 24 months.

Don’t do it. The next leg up for stocks could be even bigger.

It’s true that there are definite causes for concern. Recent disappointing employment numbers for May show the uphill climb for the jobs market isn’t getting easier. Fears about federal spending and an impasse over the debt ceiling have many worried about America’s credit rating and whether Uncle Sam has any resources left to lift the economy. The list goes on, and I’m painfully aware of the challenges. Read about 3 reasons to panic about Obama’s economic plan on InvestorPlace.com.

But it’s not all gloom and doom out there. Allow me to briefly cover 11 reasons why stocks may not be in as bad a shape as you may think:

1. Companies are flush with cash
As James Altucher pointed out in a recent MarketWatch column, stocks are hoarding the most cash in history. Read James Altucher.

As of the first quarter, non-financial U.S. companies held $1.84 trillion in cash, a whopping 27% more than in early 2007 before the recession. Yes, it’s good to have a rainy-day fund but at some point companies have to put that cash to work hiring new employees or buying equipment or expanding operations.

2. Corporate bonds are free money for stocks
Additionally, with interest rates so low, you’d be silly not to borrow cash if you’re a company in good standing. Take Google /quotes/zigman/93888/quotes/nls/goog GOOG -1.07% , which floated its first ever bond offering for $3 billion a month or so ago. Why take on debt despite an already huge cash pile? Well, because investors snapped up three-year notes from the tech giant at a measly 1.25% rate.

This “debt” may actually wind up making Google money if the rate of inflation stays high. It really is free money — money Google will presumably use to grow.

3. ‘High yield’ savings accounts aren’t
Speaking of low interest rates, so-called “high yield” savings accounts are in the ballpark of a 1.2% annual rate right now. Not what I’d call high-yield at all. The best one-year CD rates this week top out at around 1.3% and a five-year CD won’t get you much better than 2.4% annually.

Ask some folks, and that won’t even keep pace with inflation — so obviously you need to do better to grow your nest egg. That’s a big incentive for investors to put their money in stocks.

4. Treasury rates stink
Along the same lines, as of this week, we’re looking at about a 3% return on the 10-year T-note. Not very impressive — and that’s down significantly from a 3.7% rate back in February. If you don’t want to tie your money up for a long time, you’re looking at less than 0.45% on the 2-year note. Whoopee. Read whether Bill Gross blew his call on Treasuries on InvestorPlace.com.

5. Big dividends in stocks
If your reason for focusing on CDs or Treasuries is income, you can still find some tremendous dividend payers that will deliver much better returns.

Drugmaker Pfizer /quotes/zigman/238207/quotes/nls/pfe PFE -1.90% yields almost 3.9% — even after an 18% run so far in 2011.Telecom AT& T /quotes/zigman/398198/quotes/nls/t T -1.43% pays a 5.6% dividend and has tracked the market with over 4% gains in 2011. Tobacco giant Altria /quotes/zigman/294903/quotes/nls/mo MO -2.78% is up 10% in 2011 and also yields 5.6%. And there are a host of other lesser-known utilities, conglomerates and the like paying similar yields or better.

As we discussed regarding Treasuries and CDs, even if shares flat-line and all you get is your 5% or 6%, that’s a heck of a lot better than other investment vehicles, which will attract investor capital.

6. Bargain valuations for blue chips
There are some who scoff at the idea of price-to-earnings calculations since they are based on estimates that will change. I agree P/E shouldn’t be your only reason for buying, but it should be on your radar. And right now, the radar has plenty of blips that are bargains.

In tech, Microsoft /quotes/zigman/20493/quotes/nls/msft MSFT -1.98% has a forward P/E of 8.8. In manufacturing, Caterpillar /quotes/zigman/221644/quotes/nls/cat CAT -2.26% is cruising around 10.8. Big pharma leader Pfizer is around 9 flat. And as I pointed out in my column on bank stocks last week, the entire banking sector has a P/E of only slightly above 9. The list goes on. Read Jeff Reeves on banking sector P/Es

Traders work at the kiosk where Pandora internet radio is traded on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Pandora priced its IPO above its projected range and the stock gained again in its first day of trading Wednesday.

7. IPO boom
We’ve already seen some big splashes with companies going public in 2011, including RenRen /quotes/zigman/5001751/quotes/nls/renn RENN -9.07% and LinkedIn /quotes/zigman/5131883/quotes/nls/lnkd LNKD -2.25% . First quarter IPO proceeds hit $12.4 billion, up almost 200% over last year. That topped every first-quarter IPO total in the last decade except for 2008, which was skewed by a mammoth Visa offering that approached $18 billion all by itself.

What’s more, there is a host of high-profile IPOs in store for the coming months too, including Dunkin’ Brands, Facebook and others. The fact that corporations are eagerly jumping into the stock market right now indicates that the companies themselves think things are favorable for equities. Read about the 4 biggest risks to Facebook’s IPO on InvestorPlace.com.

8. Steep market declines signal a buying opportunity
Last week, the Dow closed below 12,000 for the first time since March 18, finishing a six-week free-fall. That kind of losing streak hasn’t happened since the week ending Sept. 30, 2002.

But guess what? That marked the end of a 30-month bear market and a great historic buying opportunity. The 12 months following Oct. 1, 2002, saw 20% gains for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and over 30% gains across the next 24 months.

9. Floods, tornadoes and tsunamis aren’t permanent
It’s worth noting that many of the economic data points indicating a slow-down in the global economy have happened amid a tremendously grumpy spell from Mother Nature.

Some have estimated the financial impact of Midwest flooding at $8 billion and counting. The Joplin, Mo., tornado could cost as much as $3 billion. Then there’s the earthquake and tsunami in Japan that has a price tag in the range of $250 billion to $300 billion. The impact of these recent disasters has been slowly trickling through the global markets — but is not a permanent setback.

10. The U.S. is still growing
In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, the president of the Chicago Fed said he expects the economy to grow by 3% to 3.25% in 2011, and then 3.5% to 3.75% in 2012. Separately, the Dallas Fed president and Philadelphia Fed president both predicted growth of 3% to 3.5%.

I know, I know. Many readers out there will thumb their noses at anything these guys say. But consider that the Business Roundtable’s second quarter CEO survey published on Tuesday predicted 2.8% growth. Slightly lower for 2011, but still a positive sign. Read about 10 scary economic headlines you shouldn’t fear on InvestorPlace.com.

11. The world is growing too
Even if you believe American stocks are sunk, global economic growth for 2011 as predicted by the World Bank is expected to be 3.2%. For those who want to focus on the hottest emerging markets, Russia GDP will increase 4.2% in 2011 according to estimates, Chile GDP could grow by as much as 6.5% this year, India will grow by 8.0% and China by 9.2%.

Even the battered euro zone is at least plodding upwards, with real GDP growth for member states forecast at 1.5% to 2.3% on the year by the European Central Bank.

Game trackers
On a final note, in the interest of providing some sense of accountability I have started a stock market game to track the advice I give via this column. It’s a crude mechanism — I will buy one position every week based on my writing, and you can see roughly whether I made the right call or if I was making a fool of myself. Check out Jeff Reeves stock market game on MarketWatch.

I encourage you to join in the game and follow my picks. This week’s buy will be the SPDR S& P 500 ETF /quotes/zigman/714403/quotes/nls/spy SPY -1.78%

 

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/11-reasons-stocks-will-storm-back-soon-2011-06-16?link=MW_home_latest_news