Post Reply
1-20 of 25
Some interest on this laggard. Is there something brewing? Or investor thinks that there are some value?? Vested
I am banging on Sunningdale at 12cts a piece with a NAV of 32.3cts I think its is worth a tikam.
My gut fee.l The recent change of shareholder interest to Steven Kent Uhlmann seem interesting. Not to
forget that Temasek sold from 5.81 %
To 4.92 %
http://www.sgx.com/wps/portal/marketplace/mp-en/listed_companies_info/company_announcementshttp://www.zoominfo.com/people/Uhlmann_Steven_9161311.aspxThis could be a turnaround play or takeover play. This must be your spare $$$ willing to get
lock for sometime. Vested DYODD.
Only Midas, Kepland, Ezra & Starhub in my portfolio.
Bon3260 ( Date: 27-Dec-2009 23:39) Posted:
|
Huh!? Below Counters dat hv mentioned r not in my present Trading Portfolio eh... Not even 1 eh. : (
Aiyah, they shd hv used OCBC instead mah... ('',)
lucky168 ( Date: 27-Dec-2009 23:28) Posted:
from OCBC:
"...
We continue to advocate a stock pick strategy. While the
economic outlook has improved, we believe this has been priced in.
Market attention is likely to focus on the pace and magnitude of the
economic recovery in the coming months as well as the exit stance of
the key policy makers. Several sectors are likely to continue to
outperform in 2010 including commodities, oil & gas and
infrastructure. However, as valuations are looking stretched, we
believe that it is still best to stick to a stock pick strategy. Our
top picks for 2010 are Ezra Holdings, Genting, Hyflux, Keppel
Corp, Keppel Land, Midas Holdings, MobileOne, Noble Group, Olam
International, Sembcorp Marine, Spore Telecoms, SMRT Corp, StarHub, UOL
Group and Wilmar International..."
I was surprised no banks/finance & technology stocks are in the list
|
|
|
|
Huh!? Below Counters dat hv mentioned r not in my present Trading Portfolio eh... Not even 1 eh. : (
Aiyah, they shd hv used OCBC instead mah... ('',)
lucky168 ( Date: 27-Dec-2009 23:28) Posted:
from OCBC:
"...
We continue to advocate a stock pick strategy. While the
economic outlook has improved, we believe this has been priced in.
Market attention is likely to focus on the pace and magnitude of the
economic recovery in the coming months as well as the exit stance of
the key policy makers. Several sectors are likely to continue to
outperform in 2010 including commodities, oil & gas and
infrastructure. However, as valuations are looking stretched, we
believe that it is still best to stick to a stock pick strategy. Our
top picks for 2010 are Ezra Holdings, Genting, Hyflux, Keppel
Corp, Keppel Land, Midas Holdings, MobileOne, Noble Group, Olam
International, Sembcorp Marine, Spore Telecoms, SMRT Corp, StarHub, UOL
Group and Wilmar International..."
I was surprised no banks/finance & technology stocks are in the list
|
|
from OCBC:
"...
We continue to advocate a stock pick strategy. While the
economic outlook has improved, we believe this has been priced in.
Market attention is likely to focus on the pace and magnitude of the
economic recovery in the coming months as well as the exit stance of
the key policy makers. Several sectors are likely to continue to
outperform in 2010 including commodities, oil & gas and
infrastructure. However, as valuations are looking stretched, we
believe that it is still best to stick to a stock pick strategy. Our
top picks for 2010 are Ezra Holdings, Genting, Hyflux, Keppel
Corp, Keppel Land, Midas Holdings, MobileOne, Noble Group, Olam
International, Sembcorp Marine, Spore Telecoms, SMRT Corp, StarHub, UOL
Group and Wilmar International..."
I was surprised no banks/finance & technology stocks are in the list
Quite agreed that current MapTech FA is not good. But below 2 points that i indicated will provide good path forward fr them (that i believe will help push its share value higher up)
Next MapTech debts is due to debts owned by its customers. N not due to bad management. (correct me if i am wrong)
Anyway, let see how it progress................
AK_Francis ( Date: 27-Dec-2009 21:41) Posted:
|
Agreed with d first one, cheap n good one, but not d second. Map Tech lost 22mil in 9m09, though high at 0.07 on 24 Dec 09.
PS. D 2 BOT projects worth Rmb 390mil.
dealer0168 ( Date: 27-Dec-2009 16:22) Posted:
|
|
|
if you are going for medium and long term investments for penny and putting in substantial amount of money... you need to get to know Management --- integrity and focus.... not those that keep using investors money to sustain the business with no results..
Agreed with d first one, cheap n good one, but not d second. Map Tech lost 22mil in 9m09, though high at 0.07 on 24 Dec 09.
PS. D 2 BOT projects worth Rmb 390mil.
dealer0168 ( Date: 27-Dec-2009 16:22) Posted:
|
Let talk abt Penny stock (for China & S'pore region) to look into for 2010.
For China stock, i will pick: UtdEnvirotech.
WHY? Bc of the contracts it had obtained from Dec 08 to Dec 09.
1) United Envirotech To Build China's Largest MBR Plant With RMB264 Million Contract
2) United Envirotech Secured BOT Project Of RMB245 Million
3) United Envirotech Awarded An Operation And Maintenance Contract From China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) >> RMB 150 million contract
4) United Envirotech Ltd Secured RMB 72-Million MBR Plant At Dafeng City, Jiangsu Province China
For Singapore one, i will pick MapTech.
Why?
1) Dual Listing (at Taiwan)
2) Rumour of possible divesting a subsidiary it has. (if this happen, MapTech will be cash rich)
And recent internal buying may hint something .........
Insider Trade
| No. |
Date
Announced |
Date
Transacted |
Company
Name |
Name |
Relation |
Type |
Details |
Quantity |
Price |
| 1 |
2009-12-08 |
2009-12-08 |
MAP TECHNOLOGY HLDGS LIMITED |
Jeanna Chan Meow Khing |
Director |
Buy |
# Others |
3000000 |
0.065 |
| 2 |
2009-12-08 |
2009-12-08 |
MAP TECHNOLOGY HLDGS LIMITED |
Dr David Lee Kuo Chuen |
Director |
Buy |
# Others |
3000000 |
0.065 |
| 3 |
2009-12-08 |
|
MAP TECHNOLOGY HLDGS LIMITED |
Ferrell Premier Funds Limited,... |
Substantial Shareholder |
Buy |
# Others |
3000000 |
--- |
| 4 |
2009-09-30 |
2009-09-30 |
MAP TECHNOLOGY HLDGS LIMITED |
David Lee Kuo Chuen |
Director |
Buy |
# Others |
29445000 |
0.075 |
Citigroup if i have the opportunity to buy it between at $2.00...... will keep it for 10yrs...
freeme ( Date: 23-Dec-2009 12:15) Posted:
| If you only can pick 1 stocks in 2010.. which is the one you die die will keep or buy? Give your reason and why you want it? |
|
CHINA JISHAN, potential exponential growth... Hence, huge capital gain will be expected!!!
freeme ( Date: 23-Dec-2009 12:15) Posted:
| If you only can pick 1 stocks in 2010.. which is the one you die die will keep or buy? Give your reason and why you want it? |
|
Mas has confirmed that 10 financial institutions are guilty of mis-selling structured financial products. Unfortunately, it has not come down hard on them, just a tap on the wrist. So now one of the biggest culprits, a big local bank is advertising the structured financial products again and I am sure there are ignorant people, especiallly the less educated and retirees who will fall victim because they target the hearlanders. Beware!
niuyear ( Date: 23-Dec-2009 13:20) Posted:
If looking into investments related to credit linked notes, read below extract and dont get cheated. Just for sharing .:)
Many retail investors have lost large sums of money by investing in the credit linked notes, such as the minibonds, pinnacle notes, high notes and the jubilee notes.
Several financial institutions sold these credit-linked notes to their customers. The customers were told that their monies were invested in a basket of bonds issued by highed rated companies. The chance of failure of any of these reference entities was small, and even if it materialises, their loss will only be a proportion of the invested capital, due to the diversification of the risk.
This turned out to be an incorrect description of the actual nature of the notes. The invested capital was actually used to provide the security for credit default swaps on the reference entities. If any of these entities failed, the entire capital would be lost. Instead of diversifying the risk of failure, they are taking six to eight times of the risk of failure of any single entity.
The capital was actually invested in other assets that carry their own credit risk. This adds to the total risk of loss of the capital.
The actual structure of these notes were contained in several hundred of pages of a prospectus and pricing statments. The documentation was not clear, even to knowledgeable financial experts who spent many hours to read them. Many people feel that these documents are written to conceal the real nature of the structured products.
The actual return received by the product issuer was considerably higher (due to the extremely high risk) than the yield of 5% given to the retail investors. These excess gain was earned by the issuers but was not disclosed in any documentation. There were several devices created to hide or siphon off these profits.
Due to the global recession, many credit linked notes failed, causing severe losses to the retail investors. The dishonest act was in the creation of these products, attempts made to hide the true nature of the risks and to siphon off the excess return to the product issuer.
Most distributors of these products were not aware about the true nature of the products and had negligently misrepresent the products as being safe for retail investors. They were only focused on generating large volume of sales to earn an attractive rate of commission.
To avoid being cheated, it is important for retail investors to avoid all types of structured products, especially in an regulatory environment that is weak in protecting retail investors.
Tan Kin Lian
|
|
I have been watching this counter also..
Any idea, do they still have any short term refinance issue?
Zelphon ( Date: 23-Dec-2009 12:43) Posted:
SAIZEN REITS !!!
Reasons:
1) Massive discount to NAV
2) Major shareholders accumulating
3) Massive debt issue passed as no fire sale of assets after failed to pay the loan
4) Accumulating money for dividends for June 2010
5) Residential Rental Yield is stable in Japan
|
|
I pick SPH, Safe and provide good Dividend.
freeme ( Date: 23-Dec-2009 12:15) Posted:
| If you only can pick 1 stocks in 2010.. which is the one you die die will keep or buy? Give your reason and why you want it? |
|
what requirements?
too bad no half cent stock to recommend as no counter can meet the strict requirements....good luck :)
any half cent stocks to recommend?
Penny will be Informatics Education - downside limited but upside unlimited (based on Joseph cycle analysis, it is on uptrend for next 6-7 years) and fundamental improving (old brandname)
Mid cap will be K Reit - low leverage (9%) with reasonable yield (6%), resilient and potential corporate actions and good brandname (sponsor)
Blue Chip will be Starhub - resilient (telecom) with good dividend (10%) and potential growth for nationwide NGNBN
Though there are still many good stocks....one point to take note is that we still have to listen to MARKET as MARKET IS ALWAYS RIGHT....not you or me....good luck :)
If looking into investments related to credit linked notes, read below extract and dont get cheated. Just for sharing .:)
Many retail investors have lost large sums of money by investing in the credit linked notes, such as the minibonds, pinnacle notes, high notes and the jubilee notes.
Several financial institutions sold these credit-linked notes to their customers. The customers were told that their monies were invested in a basket of bonds issued by highed rated companies. The chance of failure of any of these reference entities was small, and even if it materialises, their loss will only be a proportion of the invested capital, due to the diversification of the risk.
This turned out to be an incorrect description of the actual nature of the notes. The invested capital was actually used to provide the security for credit default swaps on the reference entities. If any of these entities failed, the entire capital would be lost. Instead of diversifying the risk of failure, they are taking six to eight times of the risk of failure of any single entity.
The capital was actually invested in other assets that carry their own credit risk. This adds to the total risk of loss of the capital.
The actual structure of these notes were contained in several hundred of pages of a prospectus and pricing statments. The documentation was not clear, even to knowledgeable financial experts who spent many hours to read them. Many people feel that these documents are written to conceal the real nature of the structured products.
The actual return received by the product issuer was considerably higher (due to the extremely high risk) than the yield of 5% given to the retail investors. These excess gain was earned by the issuers but was not disclosed in any documentation. There were several devices created to hide or siphon off these profits.
Due to the global recession, many credit linked notes failed, causing severe losses to the retail investors. The dishonest act was in the creation of these products, attempts made to hide the true nature of the risks and to siphon off the excess return to the product issuer.
Most distributors of these products were not aware about the true nature of the products and had negligently misrepresent the products as being safe for retail investors. They were only focused on generating large volume of sales to earn an attractive rate of commission.
To avoid being cheated, it is important for retail investors to avoid all types of structured products, especially in an regulatory environment that is weak in protecting retail investors.
Tan Kin Lian
