
so the government announcments regarding property was made on july 17 morning right. these announcments were made on news channels is it or where???
Developers unfazed by rise in property fee
Fiona Chan,
Property Reporter
The Straits Times
PROPERTY players have
shrugged off the sharp increases in development charges that came out of the
blue on Wednesday.
They say the impact of the hikes will be
minimal, as development charges - which developers pay to enhance a site's use
- comprise only a small proportion of total development costs.
However, experts fear the move foreshadows
further steps by the Government to cool the sizzling property market, which
they say could result in a market correction.
The anxiety stems from the Government's
unexpected move to raise development charges on Wednesday by 40 per cent.
These fees are payable if developers want
to intensify the use of a site, for instance, by building a bigger project.
However, fees paid to top up a site's lease back to 99 years will not be
affected.
Wednesday's announcement caught the market
off-guard and prompted a knee-jerk selldown of property stocks.
But major developers were unfazed
yesterday.
City Developments said the hikes would
have an 'insignificant impact' on its existing projects.
'However, we will take this increase into
consideration for future acquisitions,' a spokesman added.
Even CapitaLand took the changes in its
stride, even though its recent buys of
'These are large and branded residential
developments for which we have factored in a conservative estimate of the
development charge and other such business costs,' CapitaLand said.
It added that it expected the hikes to
raise total development costs by between 1 per cent and 3 per cent for these
two estates.
But Credo executive director Tan Hong Boon
noted that this increase was unusually high and that development charges
actually do not apply to many estates.
These include Grangeford Apartments in
Leonie Hill, whose residents are in collective sale talks, and
'Yes, the hikes will affect some potential
collective sale sites, and owners may have to expect lower prices,' said Mr
Tan.
He cited an example. 'If owners wanted
$100 million for an estate that comes with a $20 million development charge,
then the developer would be prepared to pay $120 million. But now, the charge
will rise to $28 million, so owners should expect to get only $92 million
instead of $100 million.'
However, Mr Tan estimated that there is
'still $7 billion to $10 billion worth of properties that have collective sale
potential'.
He and other property consultants are more
worried about the motivation behind the hikes than their actual impact.
'A lot of people wonder if it's the start
of the Government trying to impose some order into the market,' said Mr Lui
Seng Fatt, regional director and head of investments at Jones Lang LaSalle.
'They're waiting to see what's coming
next.'
Another consultant said: 'The actual
change itself is not hugely significant.
'Then the question is, why introduce it at
all? It's a wake-up call, maybe, that the Government can take action.'
fiochan@sph.com.sg
Website Link :
http://news.asiaone.com/News/The%2BStraits%2BTimes/Story/Developers%2Bunfazed%2Bby%2Brise%2Bin%2Bproperty%2Bfee.html