Latest Forum Topics / Biosensors | Post Reply |
Is Biosensors a good buy?
|
|
bengster68
Master |
19-Dec-2007 22:57
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi David! You should know my answer At IPO price, hard to lose. Clinically proven to be the best DES in the world now and i give Biomatrix another 5 more years as the DES king before a worthy DES can come up and challenge. No other DESs performance come close to Biomatrix now. Everything BIG has is proprietary and patented. However due to Medical Device Mafia Inc influencing regulatory approval bodies, this DES king still has no crown yet. That is why share price is still cheap. BIG trying to do 2 major deals now. If both make it though, i can say the pre-earnings stage will be over and we can see real solid exponential profits coming in soon. However, if BIG has problems in their stent technology, better dump all your BIG shares immediately. My confidence in this company is based on their top class DES technology and clinical trial performance. If any of this doesn't hold true anymore, better unload. This is still a high risk high return counter. Wish you all the best! |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
agathos
Member |
19-Dec-2007 18:35
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hi Bengster, I am David Kam. I've bought a few lots of BIG over the months. Should I buy more at 70 cents? I am happy to wait as I believe in the story of DES too. Regards, David Kam. |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
techsys
Master |
19-Dec-2007 14:04
|
x 2
x 0 Alert Admin |
Thanks bengster for the information ... I'm just thinking . news additional share with same amount of capital ... should be make a movement abit. |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
bengster68
Master |
19-Dec-2007 13:57
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Xtent Agreement amendment cost BIG nothing. For PT Fondaco, BIG issued new shares that will be locked for 12 months. Both events no cash out flow. BIG owns 50% of JWMS. Wei Gao also owns 50% of JWMS. Now Medtronic owns 15% of Wei Gao. Medtronic confirm will get their FDA within the next 3 months. However, FDA may want them to continue provide clinical data for longer-term for further analysis. No good or bad for JWMS. Maybe they may start manufacture a cheaper Medtronic version of DES in China with Wei Gao and make use of Wei Gao's distribution knowledge in China market? However, Medtronic's DES quite lousy. Still using durable polymer. I think even the made-in-china EXCEL DES is better than Endeavor. |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
techsys
Master |
19-Dec-2007 12:43
|
x 2
x 0 Alert Admin |
There are two issues right now. XTENT Agreement and acquisition of PT Fondaco Mitratama. Practicaly this acquistion will drain out some of biosensor's money. Think it'll move down a bit. Adding the holiday season, not a lot trader get in. The thing we can do ... wait till it's moving near its stable level and get it at that time. Estimation .715 with buffer .67xx something .. |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
Manikamaniko.
Master |
19-Dec-2007 10:33
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The market usually recovers when almost everyone is afraid of buying stocks. Maybe when they 'shiver and tremble' when the word 'stocks' is merely mentioned... But the stock market (ie. dominant perceptions) is also very unpredictable by nature... |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
cwwan1
Member |
19-Dec-2007 10:31
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
JWMS own 50% of JWML(Biosenors) and 50% Weigao. what good news? |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
huatah
Veteran |
19-Dec-2007 10:28
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Two big shots from BIG is here.. However, dun noe wat they r here for.. |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
allright
Senior |
19-Dec-2007 09:52
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
T hank YouBengster68 and the rest of you. ...YOU guys are so updated . So if Medtronics get their FDA approval.......isnt that good in an indirect way for BIG thru Weigao thru JWMS???? |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
A02041315
Senior |
19-Dec-2007 09:25
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Uncle BengSter< Thanks for your late last night report . Cheers!!!!!!! |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
novena_33
Veteran |
19-Dec-2007 09:19
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
yes A02041315 bro........Just saw it... this must thanks Mr bengStar ..... me just in holdiay mood only |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
A02041315
Senior |
19-Dec-2007 09:15
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Bro.Novena, BIG Coming,CHEONG LIAO |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
novena_33
Veteran |
19-Dec-2007 09:03
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hello A02041315 bro.......me just having holiday mood lar.. that all.... |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
A02041315
Senior |
19-Dec-2007 08:59
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Bro.Novena, Morning so happy,any "Good news" ?BIG going to CHEONG!!!!!!!!!!! |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
novena_33
Veteran |
19-Dec-2007 08:47
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
|
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
bengster68
Master |
19-Dec-2007 00:40
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Medtronic Moves to Widen China FootprintPartnership With Weigao
Is Part of Growth Strategy In Medical-Device Market By LAURA SANTINI
December 18, 2007; Page A2 HONG KONG -- Medtronic Inc. is buying a 15% stake in a Chinese medical-device maker for 1.73 billion Hong Kong dollars (US$221 million) and is launching its first joint venture in Asia. The Minneapolis company agreed to buy 80.7 million newly issued H shares of Shandong Weigao Group Medical Polymer Co. at HK$11.14 a piece. H shares are shares of mainland Chinese companies that are listed in Hong Kong. As part of the investment, Medtronic is also buying unlisted shares of existing Weigao shareholders. "Strategically for us, China is where we wanted to expand our footprint," said William Hawkins, chief executive officer of Medtronic. Medtronic and Weigao will form a partnership, in which Medtronic will have a 51% stake, with Weigao owning the remainder. Medtronic also will have the right to nominate two nonexecutive directors to the board of Weigao, based in China's Shandong province. The deal is subject to approval of Chinese regulators and Weigao's shareholders. Under the terms of the transaction, both companies will contribute products focusing on the treatment of spinal injuries and orthopedic ailments. Through the joint venture, Medtronic will distribute devices used in spinal-fusion surgery, while Weigao will offer artificial knees and hips. While Medtronic is attempting to widen its reach in China, Weigao's chairman, Chen Xue Li, said his company hopes to improve its product quality by collaborating with Medtronic as well as increase the array of products it offers in its home market. China represents a potentially huge market for medical devices. It is estimated that tens of thousands of Chinese suffer spinal-cord injuries each year, both because of the country's large population and because of dangerous workplace conditions as China rapidly modernizes. Many patients are construction workers, coal miners and victims of the world's highest number of auto accidents. Meanwhile, Chinese companies have been tapping the technical expertise of their Western counterparts. Medtronic already does some manufacturing in China, as well as sales and marketing of cardiac products, including pacemakers. The company currently gets between 2% and 3% of its $12.3 billion in annual revenue from China. By comparison, Japan, Medtronic's second-biggest market by sales after the U.S., accounts for about 5% of its revenue. "We think that within five to 10 years, China will surpass that," Mr. Hawkins said. Medtronic has also undertaken small-scale research and development on the mainland. For instance, in June, it unveiled Chinese-language programmers used to monitor pacemakers following implantation. The programmers, which resemble laptop computers, allow physicians to adjust the settings of a pacemaker to accommodate the level of activity of a given patient's lifestyle. The version developed in China was also about one-quarter the size and weight of Medtronic's standard product, making it easier to transport. Mr. Hawkins estimates that there are around six million people in China who have heart problems that could be treated with pacemakers. *** The crown jewel of Weigao is 50% of JWMS, contributing 25% of net profit in weigao for 2007 and at least 30% net profit in 2008.
|
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
bengster68
Master |
19-Dec-2007 00:30
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Under NOBORI 1 phase 1, Biomatrix's TLR is 0%!!! Under NOBORI 1 phase 2, Biomatrix's restenosis rate is 0.7% VS Taxus Liberte's 5.4% (at 9 months). Up to 3 years biomatrix has zero late-thrombosis problems. This is because Biomatrix reverts to BMS after 6 months. BMS has been in use for 20 years and it has no cases of late-thrombosis. There are only 2 main reasons are late-thrombosis (blood-clots): 1. Durable polymer can cause inflamation of the arteries due to sensitivity after prolong vessel contact. 2. The other main reason is some drug are still stuck in the durable polymer even after years and that is why the vessel wall is still raw and not healed even after years. This phenomenon was observed by pathologists when they examined patients that died from late-thrombosis after they cut open the arteries for further examination. The drug use is actually to prevent overly aggressive healing and could resulted in scars and vessel renarrowing that may re-clog up the blood flow. So the purpose of the drugs is actually to slow down healing to a more acceptable level and timing, which is against the nature of how our body function. When the wound remains unhealed after so long, our body may trigger the "emergency healing" to the troubled unhealed area spot (where the drug is still stuck in durable polymer) resulting in deadly blood-clots. The DES industry's path is towards biodegredable polymer path. When the polymer fully biodegrades, there will be: 1. No more long term vessel inflamation problems of durable polymer 2. No more drugs still stuck in durable polymer that causes totally unhealed vessel wounds so there will be no "emergency healing" that result in blood clots. I seriously think Biomatrix will not have late-thrombosis problems even after many years because there will be no more polymer and drug left after 6 months and what remains is a BMS. So i feel the theoretical basis of how biomatrix work is correct and it will be the answer to blood clot problems plaguing DES industry. Plus, Biomatrix is already clincially proven to be the best DES with lowest restenosis rates against global top selling DESs. Biomatrix is what i call "revolutionary and proven". Proven to be too good that rivals need to poison regulatory authorities to delay this best DES from coming into the market for as long as possible. Biodegrable is the only way to go for DES and this industry will not reverse back to BMS days. DES cost about 4 times the price of BMS and its very lucrative. If you are medical device company which type of stent will you want to make and sell? Let me say again: The first generation of new inventions will always be the worst and newer generation will be a lot better the first generation. Same for electronic devices, same for medical devices, same for IT software, etc. To put down the future of DES just because of Taxus and Cypher (first generation) is silly and denying future generations of heart patients from having a better chance of survival and quality of life. |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
EastWind
Member |
18-Dec-2007 17:52
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
You may also be interested in this article that appeared on 12 Nov 2007 in the International Herald Tribune (New York Times also carried the same article). http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/12/healthscience/12stent.php summary of article - DES stents are quite safe - safety concerns were overblown. |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
agathos
Member |
18-Dec-2007 17:15
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Dear Bio Sensor Die Hard Fans! I just want to post excerpt from a GP Newspaper in Australia called Medical Observer, found in their 20th November 2007 edition: (Medical Observer is a prestigious twice a month newspaper for Doctors in the General Practitioners category). The article titled, "Drug-eluting stents may be unfairly maligned" is on page 5 of the 30/11/2007 edition. Read on and by the way, if anyone wants to advice me (I take ownership of the risks involved) if I should buy more of BIG shares? by Kirrilly Burton Drug-eluting stens may offer not only more effective but also safer outcomes than their bare-metal alternatives, new research shows. This is despite previous studies showing an increase in potentially fatal complications from their use. A US retrospective study found one-year target vessel revascularization rates were significantly lower in drug-eluting stents than in those receiving bare-metal (5% versus 9.2%). In the former, risk of repeat vessel revascularizations by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass was 43% lower, even in patients with complex lesions. Mortality and heart attack rates were LOWER (emphasis is mine) after one year among 1460 patients who receive a drug-eluting stent (7.6%) , compared to 1763 patients with a bare-metal stent (8.7%). however, this was non significant, the authors said (Journal American College of Cardiology, 2007; 50: 2029-2036). Associate Professor David Hare, senior cardiologist at The Austin Hospital, Victoria , said concerns over the incidence of late stent thrombosis with drug eluting stents had led to a rethink of their use. "Some cardiologists stopped using them altogether. Others re<>duce their use .......to about 30% - 40% of cases. "This study provides additional evidence that a knee-jerked reaction to stop usng drug-eluting stents altogether is NOT appropriate (emphasis again, is mine). |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
almostthere
Member |
18-Dec-2007 10:12
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Thanks again A02041315. I am long, indeed very long in Bio. Waiting for the Trading Halt anytime soon, I hope. Cheers |
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |