Latest Forum Topics / Chartered | Post Reply |
CSM/AMD Vs Intel
|
||||||||
billywows
Elite |
06-Aug-2006 16:41
|
|||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yup. Livermore ...It was through those expansions that CSM suffered for the past few years. But I believe CSM has jumped over those hurdles to reap the fruits now with its Mircosoft, IBM and AMD tie up. Look around, which other company has the luxury to do biz with these 3 tech giants? If you look closely, CSM's current fundamentals are strong, but banks and institutes are putting a hold on this stock mainly due to the weak PC and excess chip inventory. We have to look far beyond - not stare at the weak tech market now and wait. Timing and positioning are crucial now. It only takes AMD and Microsoft to make the necessary annoucements in the coming months (or weeks) to stir CSM up. Trade with care .... |
|||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||||
Livermore
Master |
06-Aug-2006 16:13
|
|||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This came from an article from Billywows senior : Semiconductor companies, because of the huge expense of building and maintaining chip-fabrication facilities, also suffer from this disadvantage. Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing (Nasdaq: CHRT) for example, has found profits and free cash flow hard to come by while spending the majority of its revenue over the past few years on capital expenditures. |
|||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Livermore
Master |
06-Aug-2006 12:51
|
|||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Can Chartered erase it $1 billion loss by third quarter 2007? | |||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||||
FORREST
Member |
06-Aug-2006 12:49
|
|||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
|
|||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||||
Nostradamus
Supreme |
05-Aug-2006 18:40
|
|||||||
x 2
x 0 Alert Admin |
Here's a comparison of TSMC, UMC and CSM. TSMC reported 2Q06 sales rose 5.5% qoq. This is in line with UMC's 5.6%, but better than CSM's 3.3%. TSMC's gross profit rose 12% qoq and GP margin is 52%. This compares to UMC's 59% qoq growth and GP margin of 20.1%. CSM fared the worst with gross profit declining 5% and GP margin of 26%. Looking ahead into 3Q06, UMC expects sales to be up 2-5% which is better than TSMC and CSM's expectation of flat to down 3%. TSMC's computer exposure is 30%, communication 44%, consumer is 20%, vs UMC's 14%, 56%, 28% and CSM's 25%, 34% and 39%. UMC's better growth expectations could reflect its lower exposure to PC sector. The PC sector is currently undergoing undergoing inventory adjustment and is the worst performing sector. TSMC's sales exposure to 90nm is 24%, 130nm is 25% while UMC is 16% and 22% and CSM is 22% and 28%. TSMC and CSM's higher sales exposure to advanced chips reflect their better gross margins vs UMC. Shares of CSM outperformed TSMC and UMC in the past. With the recent plunge, the prices are now moving in line with one another. |
|||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||||
|
||||||||
billywows
Elite |
01-Aug-2006 21:42
|
|||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Another good news for AMD ..... :)) AMD nabs 25 percent of server marketIntel's still losing ground to its rival, but it's hoping new chips can staunch the losses over the rest of the year.
Published: July 31, 2006, 4:52 PM PDT
Advanced Micro Devices is still making strides in the server market at Intel's expense as the larger company waits to see if a new processor can reverse its slide. AMD on Monday said it increased its share of the x86 server processor market to 25.9 percent, a number confirmed by Mercury Research's Dean McCarron, who tracks market share figures. Intel now holds 72.9 percent of the overall market for x86 processors, while AMD has 21.6 percent. Intel's share decreased from 82.2 percent in the second quarter of 2005, while AMD's increased from 16.2 percent over the same period. Via Technologies is the third player in the mix with 5.5 percent share during the second quarter of 2006, but that figure was inflated due to end-of-life shipments of the company's C3 processor and will likely fall over the rest of the year, McCarron said. AMD has been picking away at Intel's server market share for several years based on the superior performance and power consumption of its Opteron processor. But Intel fired back last month with a new Xeon processor based on its Core microarchitecture that appears to be outperforming current Opteron processors on several tasks. Intel is pinning its hopes of resurrecting its market share--and its stock price--on the new Core generation of processors. The company launched the Core 2 Duo for desktops and notebooks last week during an event at its headquarters, and systems based on the new chips will start appearing over the coming weeks. |
|||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||||
billywows
Elite |
01-Aug-2006 21:37
|
|||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Another piece of latest good news for CSM .... :) --------------------------------------------------------------- IBM Puts AMD Inside By Alexei Oreskovic TheStreet.com Staff Reporter 1/8/2006 8:08 AM EDT IBM (IBM - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD - commentary - Cramer's Take) are set to team up in an alliance designed to boost both companies' share of the lucrative market for corporate servers. According to news reports, IBM is expected to unveil mainstream servers based on AMD processors at an event in New York on Tuesday. A representative from IBM would not comment on the reports first published earlier this month by News.com. A representative from AMD was not immediately available for comment. The move would further AMD's penetration into the server sector, where it has enjoyed its greatest commercial success, and represent another milestone in the Sunnyvale, Calif., chipmaker's battle with Intel (INTC - commentary - Cramer's Take). IBM and AMD already have various partnerships in place involving semiconductor research and development and manufacturing. But IBM currently uses AMD processors in only a small percentage of its servers, opting for chips by Intel, as well as its own Power processor, in the vast majority of its systems. By contrast, Hewlett-Packard (HPQ - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Sun Microsystems (SUNW - commentary - Cramer's Take) offer AMD processors in a wide range of their server products. And in May, Dell (DELL - commentary - Cramer's Take) announced that it would use AMD chips in its class of high-end servers that feature four processors under the hood. The news was a blow to Intel, as Dell has been one of Intel's most loyal customers, selling exclusively Intel-based systems until that point. Dell's move, as with IBM's expected announcement, are particularly significant as they come as Intel rolls out its newest server processor. The Xeon 5100 features a new microarchitecture that Intel says erases the performance and energy-efficiency advantage that AMD's Opteron chip has enjoyed for the past year or so. Gordon Haff, an analyst at industry research firm Illuminata, says the Xeon 5100 does indeed put Intel's server processors on more-or-less equal footing with AMD. But during the time Intel was catching up, the server market changed. |
|||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||||
billywows
Elite |
28-Jul-2006 07:20
|
|||||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
------------------------------------------------------
Intel cuts PC-chip prices
|
|||||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |