Back

Latest Forum Topics / Straits Times Index

Post Reply

STI to cross 3000 boosted by long-term investors Post Reply Rate topic
iPunter Supreme	15-Aug-2012 16:49        iPunter About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Yes, stocks is the easiest game to play... play and enjoy it... but don't commit suicide... lol...   Sgshares      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:45) Posted: Wah...so much profound discussion...I dont quite understand...just follow the trend will do...why make life so difficult?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
chartreader Senior	15-Aug-2012 16:49        chartreader About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	ok lah end-of-day already ... I changed my opinion from good discussion to good joke  iPunter      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:47) Posted: Sifu, what I meant is that to the fish inside the glass of water,    there's no water at all... because it is inside the water and so will         not be abe to see the glass of water at all.             For what you know, the fish may jump out and bite you                   for talking nonesense... lol... ragmop15      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:42) Posted: this is your opinion only. different people have opinions. this is the problem if it is subjective. by the way, a half filled glass can have no water because it can be filled with sand instead. lo
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
rutheone1905 Veteran	15-Aug-2012 16:49        rutheone1905 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Sg, it is ok to sometime discuss a bit here n there so tat we know we still alive....btw how many r above 40s?   heee some healthy discussion good for our frail brain.   Sgshares      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:45) Posted: Wah...so much profound discussion...I dont quite understand...just follow the trend will do...why make life so difficult?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
iPunter Supreme	15-Aug-2012 16:47        iPunter About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Sifu, what I meant is that to the fish inside the glass of water,    there's no water at all... because it is inside the water and so will         not be abe to see the glass of water at all.             For what you know, the fish may jump out and bite you                   for talking nonesense... lol... ragmop15      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:42) Posted: this is your opinion only. different people have opinions. this is the problem if it is subjective. by the way, a half filled glass can have no water because it can be filled with sand instead. lol chartreader      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:36) Posted: Sorry to say - your answer is creating more confusion than providing an answer.  How can you be sure a half filled glass has no water? How can it be rational? Again you contradict yourself for the 3rd times, when you said to determine probability, it required a rational justification. How if your justification or assumption to determine the probability is completely wrong ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
chartreader Senior	15-Aug-2012 16:46        chartreader About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	You misread the question. Read the question carefully:    " How can you be sure a half filled glass has no water?  " Of course it can be filled with sand or something else, but how can you be sure 100%?  You don't need to answer my question:-) ... because you will just give another incorrect answer. ragmop15      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:42) Posted: this is your opinion only. different people have opinions. this is the problem if it is subjective. by the way, a half filled glass can have no water because it can be filled with sand instead. lol chartreader      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:36) Posted: Sorry to say - your answer is creating more confusion than providing an answer.  How can you be sure a half filled glass has no water? How can it be rational? Again you contradict yourself for the 3rd times, when you said to determine probability, it required a rational justification. How if your justification or assumption to determine the probability is completely wrong ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
rutheone1905 Veteran	15-Aug-2012 16:45        rutheone1905 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	haha i like this very profound....cheers mkt closing liao need to go exercise liao see ya in east coast park ragmop15      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:42) Posted: this is your opinion only. different people have opinions. this is the problem if it is subjective. by the way, a half filled glass can have no water because it can be filled with sand instead. lol chartreader      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:36) Posted: Sorry to say - your answer is creating more confusion than providing an answer.  How can you be sure a half filled glass has no water? How can it be rational? Again you contradict yourself for the 3rd times, when you said to determine probability, it required a rational justification. How if your justification or assumption to determine the probability is completely wrong ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Sgshares Elite	15-Aug-2012 16:45        Sgshares About Contact  Quote this Post!   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Wah...so much profound discussion...I dont quite understand...just follow the trend will do...why make life so difficult?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
iPunter Supreme	15-Aug-2012 16:43        iPunter About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Yes sifu is right... In stocks there's really no point to be right...     Since as long as one bets correctly, one profits, When one bets wrongly, one loses...                 Stocks-betting  is an easy game to play... rutheone1905      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:30) Posted: hey guys imo normally i will aga aga say 50% if i am not too sure n say 90% if i m quite sure. so all in all normal ppl will just estimate without any data to validate.   if this discussion here will to be seen by Xinru then she will bring out lots n lots of theories to proof her points which i m really scare to get involve. i think we just move on lar....cheers
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
ragmop15 Member	15-Aug-2012 16:42        ragmop15 About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	this is your opinion only. different people have opinions. this is the problem if it is subjective. by the way, a half filled glass can have no water because it can be filled with sand instead. lol chartreader      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:36) Posted: Sorry to say - your answer is creating more confusion than providing an answer.  How can you be sure a half filled glass has no water? How can it be rational? Again you contradict yourself for the 3rd times, when you said to determine probability, it required a rational justification. How if your justification or assumption to determine the probability is completely wrong ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
chartreader Senior	15-Aug-2012 16:38        chartreader About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	right ... iPunter theory is too complicated without giving much benefit. No point discussing it further. rutheone1905      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:30) Posted: hey guys imo normally i will aga aga say 50% if i am not too sure n say 90% if i m quite sure. so all in all normal ppl will just estimate without any data to validate.   if this discussion here will to be seen by Xinru then she will bring out lots n lots of theories to proof her points which i m really scare to get involve. i think we just move on lar....cheers
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
chartreader Senior	15-Aug-2012 16:36        chartreader About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Sorry to say - your answer is creating more confusion than providing an answer.  How can you be sure a half filled glass has no water? How can it be rational? Again you contradict yourself for the 3rd times, when you said to determine probability, it required a rational justification. How if your justification or assumption to determine the probability is completely wrong ?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
rutheone1905 Veteran	15-Aug-2012 16:30        rutheone1905 About Contact  Quote this Post! Style: Combined   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	hey guys imo normally i will aga aga say 50% if i am not too sure n say 90% if i m quite sure. so all in all normal ppl will just estimate without any data to validate.   if this discussion here will to be seen by Xinru then she will bring out lots n lots of theories to proof her points which i m really scare to get involve. i think we just move on lar....cheers
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
iPunter Supreme	15-Aug-2012 16:29        iPunter About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	If you insist I answer that irrelevant question, I can give you a straight forward answer.     A half-filleld glass can either be half full, half empty, or has no water.           The last declaration will come from the fish inside the glass, of coure...                 Thus when it comes to the glass of water, it is all a just matter of viewpoints.                       But declaring a probability with a quantity in real terms is not a question of viewpoints...                             It requires a rational justification...
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
chartreader Senior	15-Aug-2012 16:23        chartreader About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	You only replied for the sake of replying, but still didn't answer my question  . Now I can agree the balance is tilted to wasted discussion. iPunter      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:17) Posted: Whether a glass is full or empty is not the question... because we are not talking about  viewpoints.     We are talking about the rationale for declaring the water level in the glass is going to rise or fall in terms of  % probability...   chartreader      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 15:52) Posted: It is a good discussion in the sense it challenge what our respective view is, so we have a chance to validate them. If the conclusion is still that the other view is not making sense, that's not necessary a waste. Again you contradict yourself, you're saying a glass is empty if it's not full. How if a glass is half full or half empty?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
chartreader Senior	15-Aug-2012 16:21        chartreader About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	I will answer you if you answer my question first  iPunter      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 16:12) Posted: But it seems the core question has not been asnwered, namely     what is it which can justify the declaration of a 95% probability?...  chartreader      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 15:52) Posted: It is a good discussion in the sense it challenge what our respective view is, so we have a chance to validate them. If the conclusion is still that the other view is not making sense, that's not necessary a waste. Again you contradict yourself, you're saying a glass is empty if it's not full. How if a glass is half full or half empty?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
iPunter Supreme	15-Aug-2012 16:17        iPunter About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Whether a glass is full or empty is not the question... because we are not talking about  viewpoints.     We are talking about the rationale for declaring the water level in the glass is going to rise or fall in terms of  % probability...   chartreader      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 15:52) Posted: It is a good discussion in the sense it challenge what our respective view is, so we have a chance to validate them. If the conclusion is still that the other view is not making sense, that's not necessary a waste. Again you contradict yourself, you're saying a glass is empty if it's not full. How if a glass is half full or half empty?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
iPunter Supreme	15-Aug-2012 16:12        iPunter About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	But it seems the core question has not been asnwered, namely     what is it which can justify the declaration of a 95% probability?...  chartreader      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 15:52) Posted: It is a good discussion in the sense it challenge what our respective view is, so we have a chance to validate them. If the conclusion is still that the other view is not making sense, that's not necessary a waste. Again you contradict yourself, you're saying a glass is empty if it's not full. How if a glass is half full or half empty?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
Sgshares Elite	15-Aug-2012 15:54        Sgshares About Contact  Quote this Post!   Mood:
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	Advancing prices on decreasing volume is a red flag. It means prices will likely correct, especially when they are at the upper end of the trading range. WARNING: Short-Term Market Correction Coming Real Soon!
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
chartreader Senior	15-Aug-2012 15:52        chartreader About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	It is a good discussion in the sense it challenge what our respective view is, so we have a chance to validate them. If the conclusion is still that the other view is not making sense, that's not necessary a waste. Again you contradict yourself, you're saying a glass is empty if it's not full. How if a glass is half full or half empty?
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me
iPunter Supreme	15-Aug-2012 15:44        iPunter About Contact  Quote this Post!
x 0   x 0  Alert Admin	No discussion is 'good'  if it doesn't make sense.     For a discussion to be beneficial, it must make sense...             Otherwise, it is no good... chartreader      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 15:38) Posted: Sound wise, but still doesn't make sense. Anyway, even I think it doesn't make sense, it's still a good discussion :-) iPunter      ( Date: 15-Aug-2012 15:33) Posted: If one says there's 50% chance of it going up... it means there's 50% chance of it going down...     In local parlance it is commonly referred to as something like " LPPL" , but not exactly.           But if one says there's 51% chance of it going up, then one is at least slightly bullishly biased.
Useful To Me  Not Useful To Me

                                                         First   < Newer   12721-12740 of 69565   Older>   Last