| Latest Forum Topics / BBR Last:0.12 -- |
 Post Reply
|
|
how long more ...
|
|
|
peter2006
Member |
27-Apr-2010 18:42
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Is BBR delisted (DL)? Anyone please advice? |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
smartrader
Elite |
08-Feb-2010 21:10
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
best hope is for takeover .. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
tradersgx
Veteran |
08-Feb-2010 19:36
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
BBR Holdings unit wins $42m contract to build Phase 1 of Yang Kee Logistics Chemical Hub at Jurong Pier : 8 Feb 2010 |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chartist2009
Member |
25-Jan-2010 23:22
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
accroding management, they wanna consolidate 5 shares into 1, to reduce the fluctuation in magnitude of the company's share price. but what strategy they are going to implement to ensure after consolidation, the share price will not drop back? if they have strategy, then why need to do consolidation? if share price drop back to $0.06 ~ $0.08, are they going to consolidate the share again? seem like this company management provide good opportunity for short sell strategy.... |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
smartrader
Elite |
25-Jan-2010 22:01
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
may go down further.... very bad decision by Management to consolidate at 5 to 1... |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
smartrader
Elite |
23-Jan-2010 10:34
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If no dividend, the share will still go lower after consolidation..... DESPATCH OF CIRCULAR Further to the announcements made by the Company on 23 December 2009 and 11 January 2010 in relation to the proposed share consolidation (the “ ordinary shares in the capital of the Company into one (1) consolidated share, the Board of Directors of the Company wishes to announce that the Company had on 23 January 2010 despatched a circular (the “ Consolidation, to shareholders of the Company (the “ to provide Shareholders with information relating to, to seek the approval of Shareholders for the Proposed Share Consolidation. The Circular also contains the Notice of Extraordinary General Meeting (the “ to be held at 50 Changi South Street 1, BBR Building, Singapore 486126 on Monday, 8 February 2010 at 9.30 a.m.. A copy of the Notice of EGM is attached to this Announcement. Shareholders who have not received the Circular within a week from 23 January 2010 should contact the share registrar of the Company at the following address:- Proposed Share Consolidation”) of every five (5)Circular”) dated 23 January 2010 in relation to, inter alia, the Proposed ShareShareholders”). The purpose of the Circular isinter alia, the Proposed Share Consolidation andEGM”) of the CompanyBoardroom Corporate & Advisory Services Pte. Ltd. 3 Church Street #08-01 Samsung Hub Singapore 049483 A copy of the Circular is available on the website of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited at http://www.sgx.com. Shareholders are requested to note the following important dates and times in respect of the EGM:- Last date and time for lodgement of Proxy Form : 6 February 2010 at 9.30 a.m. Date and time of Extraordinary General Meeting : 8 February 2010 at 9.30 a.m. Place of Extraordinary General Meeting : 50 Changi South Street 1, BBR Building, Singapore 486126 By Order of the Board of Directors BBR Holdings (S) Ltd Tan Kheng Hwee Andrew Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer
|
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
smartrader
Elite |
04-Jan-2010 21:19
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
After consolidation, it has slightly over 300 mil+ shares.. right ? So they can propose dividend payout... |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
AK_Francis
Supreme |
24-Dec-2009 20:26
Yells: "Happy go lucky, cheers." |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Ha ha, left 15 lts after consol. An abandon child, no issue loh. Hope it will improve onces construction market strengthen. Cheers. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
smartrader
Elite |
24-Dec-2009 17:35
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
the reason why the shares were not traded actively --- it is not rewarding shareholders, seems like living in its own world... |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
chinton86
Veteran |
24-Dec-2009 16:08
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
consolidate then easy to drop ma... |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
smartrader
Elite |
24-Dec-2009 14:30
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Lousy management.. consolidate shares when the shares are not actively traded....at its peak of 18-19cts .. it did not consolidate.. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
smartrader
Elite |
22-Dec-2009 14:45
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
hope the company will reward shareholders with dividends next year....bought the shares at 6 cts two yrs back using CPF ..still no return.. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
|
|
|
peter2006
Member |
11-Nov-2009 12:54
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Hope to move up soon. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
daphnecsf
Senior |
11-Nov-2009 00:15
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
BBR Holdings posts 714% in net profit to $3m Mainboard-listed BBR Holdings (S) today says net profit after tax and minority interests more than doubled to $8 million for the nine months ended 30 September 2009, a 109% increase over the $3.8 million recorded in the same period last year. The group recorded revenues of $166.7 million, down marginally by 8% or $13.5 million, primarily due to a fall in revenue recognised from building and civil works. However, gross profit increased by 14% to $13.6 million from $11.9 million previously. The group also saw an improved gross profit margin of 8% compared to 7% in the nine months of fiscal 2008 as a result of higher returns from specialised engineering projects, both in Singapore and Malaysia. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
jeremyow
Senior |
14-Sep-2009 14:59
Yells: "Passionate business investor" |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Illquidity in trading of the shares by itself is not so serious. What is serious is that the company is constantly not doing its best or lacks the capability to remain profitable for its shareholders who have poured in their hardearned money into the shareholder equity of the company. So, the earnings of the company is not growing well and thus not much or no dividends can be given back to shareholders, and thus its share price remains low and there is lack of interest in investing in the company resulting in long term illiquidity. This is very seriously harming shareholders interest when company core earnings are not growing and share price remains long term subduded with illiquidity. No matter what a company does, it must always put shareholders' interest first (that is why company should manage their business well with intergrity to continually grow the returns on equity (ROE) for their shareholders). |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
keepnosecrets
Master |
14-Sep-2009 11:17
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It is quite natural for short term outlook investors to want illiguid companies to be return cash to them. However so far what I have recently seen of companies going private are not illiquid companies, like Courts, CK Tang and Robinsons, to name a few. Shareholders are always being played into the subtle hands of "rich" directors. They might feel short-changed and that is all that is rewarding, the feeling of being short-changed. So far the bureucracy has not done much to prevent this abuse or misuse of privileges to do the investors in. It should not turn a blind eye to the happenings around us or otherwise there may in future arise "sagas" worse than layhman, and not just a few hundred hoodwinked become poorer, but share investors being deprived of all their hard earned money. Illiquid share counters should be given a chance to redeem themselves first by showing that they are viable by way of elaborate explanation, not just be accounts, and that by a certain period they must delist if they are unable to satisfy that continuing listing will be good for the public. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
jeremyow
Senior |
14-Sep-2009 10:46
Yells: "Passionate business investor" |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Illiqudity in the trading of shares of a company does suggest something about the company why its shares is not being pursued by investors. Questions to ask oneself when buying shares or holding shares to such illquid listed companies include "is the company not performing in terms of profitability so showing lackluster earnings and dividends growth" or "is it that the company's business potential has been neglected by investors so its shares is not actively traded"? If the answer is more towards mediocre or underperforming business, then it maybe justified that its shares remain illiquid and receive lack of interest by investors alike. If the answer is towards investors not realising the future potential of the underlying business, then it maybe wise to still hold onto the company shares and await the future realisation of its business value (if the company is so excellent, it will prove itself by its excellent earnings and good dividends payout, then investors cannot choose to ignore such value anymore (unless investors are stupid) and the share price will follow the excellent earnings and dividends payout and rise). Anyway, I do agree that it maybe to the shareholders' interests that a prolonged illiquid company may consider delisting its shares and go private since there is lack of attention from investors willing to invest in the company shares, and it may face difficulties in rasing capital through equity too. Going private will thus take away cost of listing on the stock exchange since there is no use for equity raising from public investors..... |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
keepnosecrets
Master |
14-Sep-2009 10:24
|
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
It is a sad case to know that many listed companies in Singapore are seen clutching at the straw refusing to sink down to reality. They are doing a disfavour not only to shareholders and themselves as directors-investors. If they can't make it as a listed company, and when their shares are not wanted, I see no point in them contiunuing. Turning private can do more good than hurt. At least the company doesn't have to continue to spend unnecessary listing and compliance expenses, and the savings can provide good cash for running the core business. Shareholders will at least receive cash payout according to the NTA positions. Turning listed companies private should be encouraged where shares of these companies are not liquid or are traded below their NTA, and directors should be responsible for paying off shareholders according to the books. |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
jeremyow
Senior |
14-Sep-2009 10:02
Yells: "Passionate business investor" |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Only buy and hold onto shares of very excellent businesses at good undervalued prices......anything falling short of these two criteria......it maybe wise to consider whether it is rational to keep holding on or to sell out and then pursue better businesses at better undervalued prices...... |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |
|
jeremyow
Senior |
14-Sep-2009 09:53
Yells: "Passionate business investor" |
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Sorry....left out another point to sell decision...... <Sell shares of a company only when business fundamentals have deteroriated irreversibily or when there is a better company than current one to invest based on future long term prospects.> <Add in:- Sell also when share price has increased so much that it is grossly overvalued for the underlying business of the stock......so that the supernormal high share price is simply not sustainable based on long term business fundamentals and so it makes sense to sell out the shares.......> |
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |