Latest Posts By pharoah88
- Supreme
![]() |
|
15-Mar-2010 18:20 |
Biosensors
/
Is Biosensors a good buy?
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
they should OVERcharge the RICH with gold plated panadol but they should not Overcharge the pOOr to enRICH themselves.
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 18:13 |
CapitaMalls Asia
/
CapMallsAsia Doji Moves Out of Down Channel
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
nO sEllErs ? | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 18:11 |
Anwell Tech
/
When it will move?
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
gOOd ObservatiOn
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 18:07 |
Midas
/
Midas
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
because of the Severe Acute Fear Syndrome [SAFS] over S stocks. many got played OUT before.
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 18:04 |
Oceanus
/
Oceanus
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
craBs are EXPENSIVE DELICACY. craps are FREE |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 18:03 |
COSCO SHP SG
/
CoscoCorp
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
somebody DON'T LIKE COSCO but somebody LIKE COSCO This TRICK is to RE-DISTRIBUTE PROFITS from one group to another. IN IN OUT OUT IN OUT IN OUT IT happened to Yang Zi JIANG also |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 18:00 |
StarHub
/
Starhub
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
MERGE ALL THREE TELCOS to ACHIEVE QUANTUM ECONOMY OF SCALE and REAP the BENEFIT of LEAST COST and MOST PROFITS. LIKE the MERGE of all bus companies into SBS before. WHY hire THREE CEOs and THREE CFOs and THREE BOARDS when the shareholders can just pay for ONE SET of CEO, CFO and BOARD? |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 17:56 |
Mermaid Maritime
/
Mermaid
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
QUALITY is there QUANTITY is the FORCE | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 17:54 |
Healthway Med
/
healthway, healthy?
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
HOT CURRY | ||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 17:52 |
Genting Sing
/
GenSp starts to move up again
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
B R E A K O U T nO PAiNS nO GAiNS mOre PAiNS mOre GAiNS less PAiNS less GAiNS |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 17:48 |
Healthway Med
/
healthway, healthy?
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
Last wEEK DRsubaru announced at this fOrum that he lOad UP ADDITIONAL 4 milliOn shares at S$0.175 on tOp Of his existing 6 milliOn shares at S$0.155. Placement Price S$0.130 was announced at the Time of Rights issue wEEks befOre the Chinese New Year. |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 17:45 |
Healthway Med
/
healthway, healthy?
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
share placements and the share placement price already DIGESTED, PURGED OUT and FLUSHED into the SHIT POOL since before the Chines New Year. Otherwise nObOdy would bUy at S$0.185. The WAIT nOw is fOr the HOT CURRY tO bE sErvEd. DRsubaru predicted it tO bE sErvEd this wEEk. Let's sEE. |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 17:39 |
Mermaid Maritime
/
Mermaid
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
Generally, it is pOsitive. Need to wait for analysts to Quantify the IMPACT. |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 17:36 |
Others
/
RWS Casino
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
Roulette had many strategies for personal preference of Risk Reward Probability. Single Number has least probabily (Highest Risk) of Highest Reward of 1 for 35. Most people test their LUCK like buying 4Ds with own favourite numbers. Sometimes but rarely can be very lucky. grouped number betting statistically increases probabilyt (decreases Risk) but reward is lower. BET on can be placed on group of 3 numbers, 6 numbers, 9 numbers, 12 numbers or whatever combinations one prefers. At the bottom of the strategy is Highest Probability (Lowest Risk) but Lowest Reward of 1 for 1. Statistically, the Highest theoretical Probability is 50:50. Bet on RED or BLACK; ODD or EVEN; 1 to 18 (1st Half) or 19 to 36 (2nd Half)
The ODDs can be theoretically improved by Trend Research. Record the past play results to identify whether the Roulette Set is BLACK set (means opens more BLACK than RED) and calculate the BLACK RED BETA, Or RED set. Also, EVEN set or ODD set; 1st Half set or 2nd Half set. To Furthe improve your ODDS theoretically, WAIT for TREND like after 3 BLACKS buy RED. Best is to CHOOSE a BLACK set, WAIT for 3 REDS and buy BLACK. As you practice with actual research data, you can FORMULATE your PERSONAL LEAST RISK STRATEGY. You can WIN MOST of the TIMES but canNOT make you RICH. GOOD for PASS TIME with FREE POCKET MONEY better than the Foreign Worker. You need PATIENCE and DISCIPLINE and HARDWORK (PAPER WORK ONLY) Three categories (COLOUR / ODD or EVEN / HALF)can be monitored at the same time. Sometimes all THREE categories' trend appear, BET and WIN THREE at ONE ROUND.
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 17:04 |
StarHub
/
Starhub
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
The rOOt Of this MARKET DISTORTION is that SingTel, M1, StarHub are in one way or another inter-related. The sO call cOmpetitiOn is REALLY iNTERNAL and CLOSED. Why waste so much TIME and MONEY to pUt Up this iN-hOuse cOmpetitiOn shOw Like MAGIC? just let the authOrity be the State ISP will do iNstead of wasting resources.
anOther blOOdy jOkE
|
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 16:58 |
StarHub
/
Starhub
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
TRACE the mOney and sEE whO rEcEive it. |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 16:56 |
Genting Sing
/
GenSp starts to move up again
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
It is all about how much profits or losses to make? In order to make more profits, one must be prepared to make losses in case. nO PAiNS nO GAiNS mOre PAiNS mOre GAiNS less PAiNS less GAiNS |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 16:28 |
StarHub
/
Starhub
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
The OUTCOME of this MARKET DISTORTION is to INCREASE COSTS, PRICES, INFLATION to the players, consumers, investors and ENRICH SOMEBODY. |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 16:23 |
StarHub
/
Starhub
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
This is MARKET HARRASSMENT of Consumers & Investors Devil in the detail The questions now are whether the proposed solution will work, and whether it introduces new distortions or problems. All new exclusive content obtained by an operator must be offered to other operators, and the other operators must carry such exclusive content offered. This has interesting and unclear repercussions. First and foremost, exclusive carriage agreements will probably become less common. It would now make more sense for an operator to insist on non-exclusive arrangements, and differentiate itself through innovative content packaging. Genuine increased differentiation will enhance consumer choice, which would be a positive outcome. MDA has said it will work with the industry on the details, and that is where the devil lies. Given that SingTel and StarHub use their respective networks to deliver other services (such as broadband) besides pay-TV, how will they ensure that their networks have sufficient bandwidth to cater for all these services, the increase in highdefinition content, and also other operators’ exclusive content? How will exclusive pay-perview content be shared and billed? It is also as yet unclear how content owners will respond. For instance, what if content owners insist on exclusive arrangements, and the operators decline to pay the higher costs associated with exclusivity and forego the content? How will MDA respond to this? The move to have all exclusive content carried by all operators was perhaps unexpected by most observers. Perhaps, a less intrusive approach could have been to require only certain MDA-designated “critical content”, such as EPL rights, be made available to all players, which would be similar to the concept of “essential facilities” in the telco world. But that opens the Pandora’s box: What is “criticalcontent” besides EPL? The pay-TV market has still not stabilised. This change will result in even greater flux. M1’s enthusiastic reception suggests that it is emboldened to enter the pay-TV market, and thinks its abilityto present a viable triple-play offering has been strengthened. But first and foremost, let’s hope that Fifa takes its cue from the Government and recognises that SingTel’s bid for the EPL rights was not sustainable, and hence the asking price for the World Cup rights ought to be reduced. If that happens, then Singaporeans will praise this policy change and its very immediate results. The writer is a corporate counsel and former Nominated Member of Parliament. |
||||
Good Post Bad Post | |||||
15-Mar-2010 16:18 |
Others
/
harrassment at work -- does anybody care?
![]() |
||||
![]() ![]() |
This is MARKET HARRASSMENT of Consumers & Investors Devil in the detail The questions now are whether the proposed solution will work, and whether it introduces new distortions or problems. All new exclusive content obtained by an operator must be offered to other operators, and the other operators must carry such exclusive content offered. This has interesting and unclear repercussions. First and foremost, exclusive carriage agreements will probably become less common. It would now make more sense for an operator to insist on non-exclusive arrangements, and differentiate itself through innovative content packaging. Genuine increased differentiation will enhance consumer choice, which would be a positive outcome. MDA has said it will work with the industry on the details, and that is where the devil lies. Given that SingTel and StarHub use their respective networks to deliver other services (such as broadband) besides pay-TV, how will they ensure that their networks have sufficient bandwidth to cater for all these services, the increase in highdefinition content, and also other operators’ exclusive content? How will exclusive pay-perview content be shared and billed? It is also as yet unclear how content owners will respond. For instance, what if content owners insist on exclusive arrangements, and the operators decline to pay the higher costs associated with exclusivity and forego the content? How will MDA respond to this? The move to have all exclusive content carried by all operators was perhaps unexpected by most observers. Perhaps, a less intrusive approach could have been to require only certain MDA-designated “critical content”, such as EPL rights, be made available to all players, which would be similar to the concept of “essential facilities” in the telco world. But that opens the Pandora’s box: What is “criticalcontent” besides EPL? The pay-TV market has still not stabilised. This change will result in even greater flux. M1’s enthusiastic reception suggests that it is emboldened to enter the pay-TV market, and thinks its abilityto present a viable triple-play offering has been strengthened. But first and foremost, let’s hope that Fifa takes its cue from the Government and recognises that SingTel’s bid for the EPL rights was not sustainable, and hence the asking price for the World Cup rights ought to be reduced. If that happens, then Singaporeans will praise this policy change and its very immediate results. The writer is a corporate counsel and former Nominated Member of Parliament. |
||||
Good Post Bad Post |
First < Newer   12701-12720 of 13894 Older> Last |