ShareJunction - Member Posts

Back

Latest Posts By pharoah88 - Supreme

About pharoah88

First < Newer 10761-10780 of 13894 Older> Last

26-Apr-2010 18:06

Baker Technology / It's time to rebound ????

Go to Message

x 0

Their REACTION was sO FAST ?

samson ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 11:33) Posted:

this morning some people use CFD to short selling.

now they had to buy back , so

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 18:03

Baker Technology / It's time to rebound ????

Go to Message

x 0

yOur brOker is gOd's mOther ? ? ? ?

sO RiGHT ? ? ? ?

words007 ( Date: 24-Apr-2010 23:54) Posted:

why so many are happy here? my broker told me that the news is good to Baker shareholders but bad to yzj's? true?

philgoh ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 12:06) Posted:

ANNOUNCEMENT BY SEMBCORP MARINE LTD

Singapore, April 26, 2010 : The Company presently holds an 85% shareholding
stake in PPL Shipyard Pte Ltd (“PPL Shipyard”). PPL Holdings Pte Ltd (“PPLH”), a
wholly owned subsidiary of Baker Technology Limited (“Baker Tech”), holds an
aggregate direct and indirect 15% shareholding interest in PPL Shipyard.
On 17 April 2010, the Board of Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) Ltd
(“Yangzijiang”) announced, inter alia, that it had issued a binding letter of offer to
Baker Tech to acquire the entire issued and paid-up share capital of PPLH (“the
Offer”). The Company had through its solicitors, Drew & Napier LLC, sent a letter to
Baker Tech and PPLH asserting, inter alia, that the circumstances have triggered
its pre-emption rights over its aggregate 15% stake in PPL Shipyard. The
Company has also put Yangzijiang on notice of its rights.
The Company is now assessing the position taken by both Baker Technology and
Yangzijiang and will make the appropriate announcement in due course.

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 17:55

YZJ Shipbldg SGD / Cruising with the ship ..Yangzijiang

Go to Message

x 0

CRASHED CRUISE

CRUISE CRASHED

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 17:53

YZJ Shipbldg SGD / Cruising with the ship ..Yangzijiang

Go to Message

x 0

From HiGH of S$1.57, it had fallen by S$0.200.

Monday: 26 APRIL 2010 17:05:03

1,766,000 S$1.370 BOUGHT frOm SELLER

NEXT SUPPORTS:

S$1.32

S$1.26

S$1.21

pharoah88 ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 17:48) Posted:

$2.07

Monday: 26 APRIL 2010 CLOSING

75,119,000 S$1.37 -S$0.06

SHAREHOLDERS DID NOT LIKE THE ANNOUNCEMENT ?

pharoah88 ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 17:14) Posted:

Friday: 23 APRIL 2010 CLOSING

S$1.43 -S$0.050

HALTED in the afternoon.

An UNeventful day

Generally, a prOfit Taking day across the board

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 17:48

YZJ Shipbldg SGD / Cruising with the ship ..Yangzijiang

Go to Message

x 0

$2.07

Monday: 26 APRIL 2010 CLOSING

75,119,000 S$1.37 -S$0.06

SHAREHOLDERS DID NOT LIKE THE ANNOUNCEMENT ?

pharoah88 ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 17:14) Posted:

Friday: 23 APRIL 2010 CLOSING

S$1.43 -S$0.050

HALTED in the afternoon.

An UNeventful day

Generally, a prOfit Taking day across the board

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 17:40

YZJ Shipbldg SGD / Cruising with the ship ..Yangzijiang

Go to Message

x 0

This Oil PRiCE did nOt have any iMPACT tOday ? ? ? ?

tradersgx ( Date: 24-Apr-2010 04:36) Posted:

tradersgx ( Date: 24-Apr-2010 03:08) Posted:

Rationale: YZJ To Enter The Robust Offshore Sector (^.^ )

The Board of Yangzijiang is of the view that this strategic acquisition would be in the best interest
of the Group as Yangzijiang’s post-Acquisition involvement in PPL Shipyard's business for the
design and construction of offshore drilling rigs would add to, and further strengthen Yangzijiang's
capabilities in this area and further the Group's development and competency strategies.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

19 April 2010 CIMB

Yangzijiang Shipbuilding; Move into Offshore

OUTPERFORM; Target: S$2.07

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 17:14

YZJ Shipbldg SGD / Cruising with the ship ..Yangzijiang

Go to Message

x 0

yOur brOker is gOd's mOther ? ? ? ?

sO RiGHT ? ? ? ?

words007 ( Date: 24-Apr-2010 23:54) Posted:

why so many are happy here? my broker told me that the news is good to Baker shareholders but bad to yzj's? true?

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 16:47

YZJ Shipbldg SGD / Cruising with the ship ..Yangzijiang

Go to Message

x 0

are yOu gOd ? ? ? ?

CheongCK ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 14:28) Posted:

Fruits Gets Bigger

Cherry Picks

pharoah88 ( Date: 23-Apr-2010 10:17) Posted:

With this PARADIGM, it is bEttEr fOr it tO drOp TiLL FLAT FiRST.

thEn, EvErybOdy CHERRY PiCKS TiLL One's DESiRE is SATIATED

T G i F

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 16:43

SMRT / SMRT

Go to Message

x 0

x 1

Sometimes, the Math doesn’t add up
PTC chairman Gerard Ee explained that those who will end up paying more are mostly those taking a long journey.
Since fares are based on distance, this seems to make sense. Or does it?
Is it fair that a commuter taking a long trip from point X to point Y will now have to pay more under the new distance-based fare system? The distance between X and Y has not changed. And the penalties for transfers have also been removed.
So, essentially, it has just become more expensive to travel the same distance from X to Y.
To put a dollar value to the concessions of the public transport operators, it was reported that it will cost SMRT Corporation and SBS Transit, some $32 million, split almost evenly between the island’s two main public transport providers.
But as SBS Transit chief executive Gan Juay Kiat acknowledged: “We believe that it will lead to an overall increase in public transport travel and are confident that this increase may more than offset the costs that we have to bear as a result of the change.”
So what is the big deal about the $32-million figure if the increased ridership is expected to “more than offset” the concessions given?

Big numbers = small savings?
Here are some other “big numbers” to consider.
Last year, SBS Transit, which also runs the North East Line (NEL) line, earned net profits of $54.6 million on revenues of $697.1 million — or about 8-per-cent margin on revenue.
SMRT reported net earnings of some $162.73 million on revenues of $878.95 million, a margin of 18.5 per cent.
Surely, the pair could have offered better savings to the commuter?
Especially since they expect overall ridership to increase as a result of the new fare system.
As one commuter pointed out, when Hong Kong’s two major train operators, the Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation and the Mass Transit Railway Corporation, merged, fare concessions amounted to HK$600 million or more than $120 million.
Cuts amounted to more than 10 per cent for long-distance travellers with more than half the commuters using Octopus smart cards enjoying 5-per-cent reductions in travel costs.
Now, that’s what I call meaningful savings.

Surely we can do better than Hong Kong?

The writer is editor-at-large at Today.

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 16:36

SMRT / SMRT

Go to Message

x 0

We believe that it will lead to an overall increase in public transport travel and are confident that this increase may more than offset the costs that we have to bear as a result of the change.

Mr Gan Juay Kiat,

SBS Transit chief executive

While, the move to do away with transfer penalties is to be commended, the savings seem low. Commuters will save, on average, 2.5 per cent or about 48 cents a week (or just about $25 a year), according to the Public Transport Council (PTC).

And not all commuters will enjoy savings — some 34 per cent will see an increase of about 31 cents a week (or $16 a year).

On top of this, the 15-month fare discount of 3 per cent to help commuters tide over the global economic downturn, will come to an end.

T h e s av i n g s a re based on the maximum adjustment allowed by the PTC — calculated using a formula which takes into account the change in the consumer price index (CPI) and the change in average monthly earnings over the preceding year.

This formula has worked well in most years, coupled with discounts, it has helped to cushion fare increases that might have otherwise been out of sync with the peaks and troughs of the island’s economic cycle.

However, in a year like this, when the PTC is making a major change, and a planned one at that, to implement distance-based fares across the public transport system, perhaps it should have considered a one-off tweak to the formula — to make the savings more substantial.

rom July 3 commuters will not have to pay a penalty when they transfer from one bus to another or from a train to a bus or vice versa. This is when the distance-based through-fare system to make transfers more seamless in Singapore’s hub-and-spoke public transport system takes effect.

pharoah88 ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 16:30) Posted:

Comment

&analysis today Monday April 26, 2010 page 12
Operators should offer better savings

The move to do away with transfer penalties is commendable, but savings offered to commuters seem low

Conrad Raj

conrad@mediacorp.com.sg

leejlk ( Date: 21-Apr-2010 17:22) Posted:

Top Idea
Land Transport
PTC announces shift to full distance
‐based fares
This July, the average bus and train fare will be cut by 2.5%, according to the Public Transport Council (PTC), when it completely cuts over to the new distance

We maintain BUY on SMRT with a target price of $2.47 and HOLD on ComfortDelgro with a target price of $1.72.
‐based fare system. Previously, commuters who switched modes of transport were hit as they had to pay full fares on both portions, effectively a transfer penalty. In the past two years, they received some reprieve in the form of transfer rebates. With a full distance‐based system, this rebate will be removed but the commuter will only need to pay for the exact distance travelled.

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 16:30

SMRT / SMRT

Go to Message

x 0

Comment

leejlk ( Date: 21-Apr-2010 17:22) Posted:

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 13:40

Others / RWS Casino

Go to Message

x 0

the issue of gambling licence is like a TV drama ? ? ? ?

tO make people nervOus ? ? ? ?

yummygd ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 09:33) Posted:

mbs do not have gambling licence yet wor

tchoonw ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 08:39) Posted:

so u going to try out mbs this wk

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 13:30

BeautyChina / BeautyChina

Go to Message

x 0

The EQUITY FRAUD ? ? ? ?

WHO are the CULPRITS ? ? ? ?

Can the Directors alOne LiST their cOmpanies ? ? ? ?

AnthonyTan ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 09:58) Posted:

Pl. bear in mind that when a coy go public,the management

oreli collect plenty plenty of your moneies and keep them

hot hot. Afterwhich, the CEO and Directors working for

the coy,get very high high pay plus perks working for the

coy. Even if the coy go bankrupt, they oreli collected

plenty plenty of monies.. They were be laughing

all the way to the banks. You died your own business.

e.g. China S-Chip shares.Check it out.

words007 ( Date: 24-Apr-2010 23:44) Posted:

Fuck you directors and Liquidators BCHL. Return my money!!!!!!
DELISTING OF BEAUTY CHINA HOLDINGS LIMITED
("BCHL" or "the Company")
Further to the Company's announcement dated 12 April 2010, the Liquidators of BCHL
sought an exemption from the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (“
“
(the “
Exchange directed that, in the absence of a reasonable exit offer, BCHL is required to make
an announcement detailing the reasons on why the Company is insolvent and unable to
comply with the aforementioned Rule 1309 of the Listing Manual.
The Liquidators wish to state that based on the Statement of Affairs filed by the directors of
the Company, BCHL is unable to repay its debts and that proceeds to be realized from the
assets of the Company (if any), are not expected to be sufficient to settle the Company's
debt. Accordingly, the Company is not in any position to make a reasonable exit offer to
shareholders of BCHL.
The Liquidators of the Company will continue to keep shareholders informed and updated on
material developments in respect of the status of the Company. Further announcements will
be made as and when appropriate.SGX-ST” orthe Exchange”) from having to comply with Rule 1309 of the Listing Manual of the SGX-STListing Manual”) in relation to the delisting of its shares. On 22 April 2010, the
For and on behalf of
Beauty China Holdings Limited – In Liquidation
Lai Kar Yan (Derek)
Yeung Lui Ming (Edmund)
Joint and Several Liquidators
Acting as agents of the Company without personal liability

23 April 2010

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 13:28

BeautyChina / BeautyChina

Go to Message

x 0

NEGLIGENCE in DUE DILIGENCE ? ? ? ?

If in the USA, can be sued by FED like the Golden Sach ? ? ? ?

des_khor ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 12:28) Posted:

I'm personally think SGX should compensate the innocent investors for those China Germs to be delisted !! The reason is SGX did not do their part before brought in those nasty germs here !! Is time for MAS to say some things on behalf for the uncle & auntie who lost money !! They should to do the way like Lehman Mini Bond to compensate to the investor !!

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 13:17

Oceanus / Oceanus

Go to Message

x 0

If there is nO UNcertainty, Market Makees would rush in to buy the Singapore shares now.

In that case, Singapore share PRiCE should RiSE by tOday.

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 13:01

Oceanus / Oceanus

Go to Message

x 0

The PRiCE Averaging Scheme is to Maximise Profit for the Market Maker.

Just like IPO is also done in Booking Building to get Highest IPO PRiCE.

This is al l EXTRA work but to get Higher Profit or Benefit for the Market Maker.

Otherwise, they can just FIX a PRICE and everybody has nO UNcertainty to deal with.

If Market Maker makes more, we as Makees would have less.

ZERO SUM GAME

I dOn't mind to have a little less but not to be caught in loss situation.

Like Goldman Sach type of Market Making FRAUD

The lOw Singapore share could also be a Manipulated Stunt in order to sell the Conversion Scheme ? ? ? ?

Possible ?

Probable ?

Predictable ?

Preventable ?

Laulan ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 12:23) Posted:

You need to have a free balance in your CPD acct to apply for the depository receipts. So whatever alloted is deducted from your account. How to reject? Why should they trap you when then can do so by selling down the shares? What data do you rely on to arrive at this suggestion? Curious to see you have this phobia.

pharoah88 ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 12:14) Posted:

Can this CONVERSION be a TRAP ? ? ? ?

When the bOOk is fUll, Taiwan ADR PRiCE is DUMPED for 10 days.

When allOcated at a lOw PRiCE can the applicant REJECT the allOcatiOn ?

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 12:14

Oceanus / Oceanus

Go to Message

x 0

Can this CONVERSION be a TRAP ? ? ? ?

When the bOOk is fUll, Taiwan ADR PRiCE is DUMPED for 10 days.

When allOcated at a lOw PRiCE can the applicant REJECT the allOcatiOn ?

Busta1 ( Date: 25-Apr-2010 00:25) Posted:

The price-fixing date is not stated in the announcement, but I think it should be closer to the bookbuilding exercise in June. Price in TW need to stay high during that period.

novicealex ( Date: 25-Apr-2010 00:18) Posted:

In my opinion, there should be a gap up in the Monday opening as there is a "BIG" gap in the last traded price from TDR and Singapore. Stated very clearly in the announcement, it will be no more than 10% discounted from the "average" traded price. So we need to checkout the average trading price since the last announcement which is 12 Apr 2010 till Application Closed Date (tentatively 7 May 2010). As for Monday onwards, I foresee our side here will try to match around 15-10% discount of the Taiwan trading price. Thus there is still quite a substantial upside on this counter for the next 2 weeks.

Congrats to all die-hard fans.

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 11:18

Ying Li Intl / Ying Li

Go to Message

x 0

Professor Sebastian CHONG concluded that it is the WRONG TiME to sell shares now.

His Recommendation: 90% of SPARE CASH [# nOt bOrrOwed lOan #]

shoud be in equities nOw to RiDE the Singapore Recovery.

pharoah88 ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 10:38) Posted:

fOr fUll details

CHECH Out at his website

shareOwl.com

pharoah88 ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 10:33) Posted:

Sunday: 25 APRIL 2010

Asia Trader and Investor Convention 2010 ATIC Suntec Hall 401

04:45pm - 05:15pm

Professor Sebastian CHONG

Founder & Provocateur, Shareowl.com

My favourite Singapore and Hong Kong Stock Picks

for Activie Trading

He picked 3 property stocks in HONG KONG

and 1 property stock in SINGAPORE

He commented that he is confident of these stocks.

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 11:04

Ying Li Intl / Ying Li

Go to Message

x 0

to my surprise, he PiCKed YANLORD, which i AVOIDED before his talk.

now i will re-lOOk YANLORD which is actually at a gOOd PRiCE.

sEEms

yummygd ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 10:34) Posted:

which is the property stock in singapore??

pharoah88 ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 10:33) Posted:

Good Post Bad Post

26-Apr-2010 10:38

Ying Li Intl / Ying Li

Go to Message

x 0

fOr fUll details

CHECH Out at his website

shareOwl.com

pharoah88 ( Date: 26-Apr-2010 10:33) Posted:

Good Post Bad Post

First < Newer 10761-10780 of 13894 Older> Last

ShareJunction Version: 27 Nov 2020 ver - All Rights Reserved. Copyright ShareJunction Pte. Ltd. Disclaimer: All prices from are delayed. ShareJunction does not provide you with any financial advice. We are not into the business of providing any investment advice. See our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy of using this website. Data is delayed for varying periods of time depending on the exchange, but for at least 15 minutes. Copyright © SIX Financial Information Ltd. and its licensors. All Rights reserved. Further distribution and use by third parties prohibited. SIX Financial Information and its licensors make no warranty for information displayed and accept no liability for data and prices. SIX Financial Information reserves the right to adapt and/or alter this website at any time without prior notice.

Web design by FoundationFlux. Hosted with Signetique Cloud.